A Conceptual Model of an Oncology Information System

Introduction Oncologists are usually faced with a huge amount of diagnostic and therapeutic data in the process of cancer care. However, they do not have access to the integrated data. This research aimed to present a conceptual model of an oncology information system based on the users’ requirements. Methods This study was conducted in 2019 and composed of two phases. Initially, a questionnaire was designed, and clinical experts (n=34) were asked to identify the most important data elements and functional requirements in an oncology information system. In the second phase, conceptual, structural and behavioral diagrams of the system were drawn based on the results of the first phase. These diagrams were also reviewed and validated by five experts. Results Most of the data elements and all functional requirements were found important by the experts. The data elements were related to different phases of cancer care including screening, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, mental care and pain relief, and end-of-life care. Then, conceptual, structural and behavioral diagrams of the system were designed and approved by the experts or revised based on their comments. Conclusion The conceptual model and the diagrams presented in the current study can be used for developing an oncology information system. This system will be able to manage patients’ cancer data from screening to the end-of-life care. However, the system needs to be designed and implemented in a real healthcare setting to see how it can meet users’ requirements.

[1]  David Hanauer,et al.  Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Daniel Urda,et al.  Addressing critical issues in the development of an Oncology Information System , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  A. Nahvijou,et al.  A REVIEW OF ONCOLOGY CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS- WHAT ARE THE CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS AND REASONS FOR SYSTEM FAILURE? , 2018, Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences.

[4]  L. Potters,et al.  Practice-based evidence to evidence-based practice: building the National Radiation Oncology Registry. , 2013, Journal of oncology practice.

[5]  A. Nahvijou,et al.  Improving Quality of Cancer Registration in Iran. Part1: Evaluation and Comparison of Cancer Registration Results in the Country , 2010 .

[6]  Azaeh Yazdanian,et al.  Oncology Information System: A Qualitative Study of Users’ Requirements , 2019, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[7]  R. Ghiasvand,et al.  Situation analysis of the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (2013) in the I. R. of Iran; assessment and recommendations based on the IAEA imPACT mission. , 2014, Archives of Iranian medicine.

[8]  F D Ashbury,et al.  Implementing a regional oncology information system: approach and lessons learned. , 2014, Current oncology.

[9]  Hiroshi Tsuji,et al.  Development of Clinical Database System Specialized for Heavy Particle Therapy , 2015, MedInfo.

[10]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The unified modeling language reference manual , 2010 .

[11]  Sridhar Yaddanapudi,et al.  Technical note: electronic chart checks in a paperless radiation therapy clinic. , 2012, Medical physics.

[12]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics, 2002 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  Ping Yu,et al.  Different usage of the same oncology information system in two hospitals in Sydney - Lessons go beyond the initial introduction , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  Yutaka Ando.  Oncology Information System , 2014 .

[15]  Brian Gannon,et al.  An analysis of electronic document management in oncology care , 2012, Health Informatics J..

[16]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Cancer Incidence in Five Continents: Inclusion criteria, highlights from Volume X and the global status of cancer registration , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[17]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[18]  Roland Bal,et al.  What Makes an Information System More Preferable for Clinicians? a Qualitative Comparison of Two Systems , 2011, MIE.

[19]  D Lyalin,et al.  Modeling Cancer Registration Processes with an Enhanced Activity Diagram , 2005, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[20]  Celeste Marques Oliveira,et al.  The Relevance of DICOM-RT in Radiotherapy Information Systems - Preliminary Results from a National Survey , 2012, HEALTHINF.

[21]  M. Akbari,et al.  Quality Assessment of the National Cancer Registry in Iran: Completeness and Validity , 2016 .

[22]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[23]  Mia A Levy,et al.  Integrated information systems for electronic chemotherapy medication administration. , 2011, Journal of oncology practice.

[24]  Taizo Murata,et al.  Unified Modeling Language (UML) for hospital-based cancer registration processes. , 2008, Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.

[25]  Heather N. Watson,et al.  Use of electronic medical records (EMR) for oncology outcomes research: assessing the comparability of EMR information to patient registry and health claims data , 2011, Clinical epidemiology.