Flap Complications in Our Learning Curve of Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Using the Hansatome Microkeratome

PURPOSE To determine the incidence and the type of flap complications in our initial series of eyes undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis and the impact of microkeratome-related complications on best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. METHODS We reviewed the charts of the 630 consecutive eyes operated in the Refractive Surgery Department of Cerrahpasa Medical School, University of Istanbul, Turkey using the Hansatome microkeratome and the Summit, SVS Apex Plus excimer laser between March 1998 and November 1999. The mean follow-up was 12.6 months. RESULTS The incidence of total flap complications was 19.8%. Flap folds (5%) were the most common complication. The incidence of epithelial ingrowth was 3.3%. Diffuse lamellar keratitis was encountered in 20 cases (3.17%). Displaced flaps were seen shortly after the procedure in 8 eyes (1.26%) and repositioned immediately. Improper keratectomy occurred in 14 eyes (2.2%) and incomplete keratectomy in four procedures (0.63%). The presence of interface debris and hemorrhage was each 1.9%. We observed one interface abscess, which was culture-negative and cured with fortified antibiotics, and one free flap. CONCLUSIONS Although the LASIK procedure with the Hansatome had an easy learning curve without any of the serious complications that frequently occur in this phase, we still observed flap related complications that affected visual outcome.

[1]  Surendra Basti,et al.  Experience during the learning curve of laser in situ keratomileusis , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  I G Pallikaris,et al.  A corneal flap technique for laser in situ keratomileusis. Human studies. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  D. Fan,et al.  Management of severe flap wrinkling or dislodgment after laser in situ keratomileusis. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  G. J. Jin,et al.  Results of flap repositioning after laser in situ keratomileusis , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  D. Koch,et al.  Diffuse lamellar keratitis associated with epithelial defects after laser in situ keratomileusis , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  Complications of laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of myopia. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[7]  R. Maloney,et al.  Flap complications associated with lamellar refractive surgery. , 1999, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  T. Seiler,et al.  [Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Intraoperative and postoperative complications]. , 1999, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft.

[9]  R. Maloney,et al.  Six‐month results of the Multicenter Phase I Study of Excimer Laser Myopic Keratomileusis , 1994, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  A. Castillo,et al.  Peripheral melt of flap after laser in situ keratomileusis. , 1998, Journal of refractive surgery.

[11]  S. Wilson,et al.  Lower intraoperative flap complication rate with the Hansatome microkeratome compared to the Automated Corneal Shaper. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[12]  R. Maloney,et al.  Diffuse lamellar keratitis. A new syndrome in lamellar refractive surgery. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[13]  G. Waring,et al.  Excimer laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) under a corneal flap for myopia of 2 to 20 D. , 1995, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[14]  E. Manche,et al.  Sloughing of corneal epithelium and wound healing complications associated with laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Gimbel Hv Flap complications of lamellar refractive surgery. , 1999 .

[16]  Anatomic factors affecting microkeratome placement in laser in situ keratomileusis , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.