Mechanism design with level-k types: Theory and an application to bilateral trade

This paper studies mechanism design under the level-k solution concept. The first result gives a general necessary condition for a social choice rule to be level-k implementable. In some environments, this necessary condition is equivalent to Bayesian incentive compatibility, making level-k implementation more restrictive than Bayesian implementation. The second result shows that this is not a general implication. In the bilateral trade environment ex post efficient trade is always possible under level-k implementation. Further, ex post efficient trade is possible in a mechanism that is robust to different specifications of beliefs about the levels of reasoning of others and to any specification of beliefs about payoffs.

[1]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study , 1998 .

[2]  Olga Gorelkina,et al.  Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Bonn 2015 / 3 The Expected Externality Mechanism in a Level-k Environment , 2015 .

[3]  Vincent P. Crawford Efficient mechanisms for level-k bilateral trading , 2021, Games Econ. Behav..

[4]  Roberto Serrano,et al.  Implementation in adaptive better-response dynamics: Towards a general theory of bounded rationality in mechanisms , 2011, Games Econ. Behav..

[5]  Zvika Neeman,et al.  Behaviorally Optimal Auction Design: Examples and Observations , 2009 .

[6]  Alexander Wolitzky,et al.  Mechanism design with maxmin agents: theory and an application to bilateral trade , 2016 .

[7]  R. Spiegler,et al.  Optimal speculative trade among large traders , 2008 .

[8]  Robert Forsythe,et al.  Selection Criteria in Coordination Games: Some Experimental Results , 1987 .

[9]  Kfir Eliaz,et al.  A Mechanism-Design Approach to Speculative Trade , 2005 .

[10]  M. Satterthwaite,et al.  Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading , 1983 .

[11]  Tomasz Strzalecki,et al.  Depth of Reasoning and Higher Order Beliefs , 2010 .

[12]  Sergei Severinov,et al.  Screening when some agents are nonstrategic: does a monopoly need to exclude? , 2006 .

[13]  Vincent P. Crawford,et al.  Replication data for: Cognition and Behavior in Two-Person Guessing Games: An Experimental Study , 2019 .

[14]  D. Bergemann,et al.  Robust Mechanism Design , 2003 .

[15]  R. Aumann,et al.  Unraveling in Guessing Games : An Experimental Study , 2007 .

[16]  R. Serrano,et al.  Level-$k$ Mechanism Design , 2018, The Review of Economic Studies.

[17]  Kfir Eliaz,et al.  Contracting with Diversely Naive Agents , 2004 .

[18]  Colin Camerer,et al.  A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games , 2004 .

[19]  Kfir Eliaz A Mechanism-Design Approach to Speculative , 2006 .

[20]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Imperfect Choice or Imperfect Attention? Understanding Strategic Thinking in Private Information Games , 2014 .

[21]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  Motives and Implementation: On the Design of Mechanisms to Elicit Opinions , 1998 .

[22]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Cognition and Behavior in Two-Person Guessing Games: An Experimental Study , 2003 .

[23]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  The 11-20 Money Request Game: Evaluating the Upper Bound of k-Level Reasoning , 2010 .

[24]  Rene Saran,et al.  Bilateral trading with naive traders , 2011, Games Econ. Behav..

[25]  V. Crawford,et al.  Fatal Attraction: Focality, Naivete, and Sophistication in Experimental "Hide-and-Seek" Games , 2007 .

[26]  Miguel A. Costa-Gomes,et al.  Structural Models of Nonequilibrium Strategic Thinking: Theory, Evidence, and Applications , 2013 .

[27]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  A Model of Persuasion with Boundedly Rational Agents , 2012, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Toshihide Matsuo,et al.  On incentive compatible, individually rational, and ex post efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading , 1989 .

[29]  The Political Economy of Multilateral Aid Funds , 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  D. Stahl,et al.  Experimental evidence on players' models of other players , 1994 .

[31]  Geoffroy de Clippel,et al.  Behavioral Implementation ∗ , 2012 .