Coalescent embedding in the hyperbolic space unsupervisedly discloses the hidden geometry of the brain

The human brain displays a complex network topology, whose structural organization is widely studied using diffusion tensor imaging. The original geometry from which emerges the network topology is known, as well as the localization of the network nodes in respect to the brain morphology and anatomy. One of the most challenging problems of current network science is to infer the latent geometry from the mere topology of a complex network. The human brain structural connectome represents the perfect benchmark to test algorithms aimed to solve this problem. Coalescent embedding was recently designed to map a complex network in the hyperbolic space, inferring the node angular coordinates. Here we show that this methodology is able to unsupervisedly reconstruct the latent geometry of the brain with an incredible accuracy and that the intrinsic geometry of the brain networks strongly relates to the lobes organization known in neuroanatomy. Furthermore, coalescent embedding allowed the detection of geometrical pathological changes in the connectomes of Parkinson's Disease patients. The present study represents the first evidence of brain networks' angular coalescence in the hyperbolic space, opening a completely new perspective, possibly towards the realization of latent geometry network markers for evaluation of brain disorders and pathologies.

[1]  M. Ghilardi,et al.  The Olfactory System Revealed: Non-Invasive Mapping by using Constrained Spherical Deconvolution Tractography in Healthy Humans , 2017, Front. Neuroanat..

[2]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  J. V. Van Horn,et al.  Sex Differences in the Influence of Body Mass Index on Anatomical Architecture of Brain Networks , 2017, International Journal of Obesity.

[4]  Alan Connelly,et al.  The effects of SIFT on the reproducibility and biological accuracy of the structural connectome , 2015, NeuroImage.

[5]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  Three‐dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[6]  M. Hoehn,et al.  Parkinsonism , 1998, Neurology.

[7]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  Kevin A. Johnson,et al.  Unique Microstructural Changes in the Brain Associated with Urological Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (UCPPS) Revealed by Diffusion Tensor MRI, Super-Resolution Track Density Imaging, and Statistical Parameter Mapping: A MAPP Network Neuroimaging Study , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  John D. Van Horn,et al.  Circular representation of human cortical networks for subject and population-level connectomic visualization , 2012, NeuroImage.

[10]  J. Hughes,et al.  Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  S. Marino,et al.  Red nucleus connectivity as revealed by constrained spherical deconvolution tractography , 2016, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  P. Thiran,et al.  Mapping Human Whole-Brain Structural Networks with Diffusion MRI , 2007, PloS one.

[14]  S. Marino,et al.  Constrained Spherical Deconvolution Tractography Reveals Cerebello-Mammillary Connections in Humans , 2017, The Cerebellum.

[15]  Andrei Irimia,et al.  Multivariate morphological brain signatures predict patients with chronic abdominal pain from healthy control subjects , 2015, Pain.

[16]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  A. Bonnet,et al.  [The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale]. , 2000, Revue neurologique.

[18]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[19]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Studying the human brain anatomical network via diffusion-weighted MRI and Graph Theory , 2008, NeuroImage.

[20]  A. Beck,et al.  An inventory for measuring depression. , 1961, Archives of general psychiatry.

[21]  Olivier Colliot,et al.  Structural connectivity differences in left and right temporal lobe epilepsy , 2014, NeuroImage.

[22]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Whole-brain anatomical networks: Does the choice of nodes matter? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[24]  J. V. Van Horn,et al.  Patterns of brain structural connectivity differentiate normal weight from overweight subjects , 2015, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[25]  S. Marino,et al.  Extensive Direct Subcortical Cerebellum-Basal Ganglia Connections in Human Brain as Revealed by Constrained Spherical Deconvolution Tractography , 2016, Front. Neuroanat..

[26]  G. Anastasi,et al.  A Direct Cortico-Nigral Pathway as Revealed by Constrained Spherical Deconvolution Tractography in Humans , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Meng Li,et al.  Disrupted brain anatomical connectivity in medication-naïve patients with first-episode schizophrenia , 2015, Brain Structure and Function.