Psychological distance reduces literal imitation: Evidence from an imitation-learning paradigm.

The present experiments tested the hypothesis that observers engage in more literal imitation of a model when the model is psychologically near to (vs. distant from) the observer. Participants learned to fold a dog out of towels by watching a model performing this task. Temporal (Experiment 1) and spatial (Experiment 2) distance from the model were manipulated. As predicted, participants copied more of the model's specific movements when the model was near (vs. distant). Experiment 3 replicated this finding with a paper-folding task, suggesting that distance from a model also affects imitation of less complex tasks. Perceived task difficulty, motivation, and the quality of the end product were not affected by distance. We interpret the findings as reflecting different levels of construal of the model's performance: When the model is psychologically distant, social learners focus more on the model's goal and devise their own means for achieving the goal, and as a result show less literal imitation of the model. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  M. Brass,et al.  The predictive chameleon: evidence for anticipated social action. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Arnd Florack,et al.  Attention on the source of influence reverses the impact of cross-contextual imitation. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Arnd Florack,et al.  The power of movement: evidence for context-independent movement imitation. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  M. Carpenter,et al.  Putting the social into social learning: explaining both selectivity and fidelity in children's copying behavior. , 2012, Journal of comparative psychology.

[5]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[7]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Feeling Close: Emotional Intensity Reduces Perceived Psychological Distance , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Jason P. Mitchell.  Inferences about mental states , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Y. Trope,et al.  The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now , 2008, Science.

[10]  E. Pronin.  How We See Ourselves and How We See Others , 2008, Science.

[11]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Prospection: Experiencing the Future , 2007, Science.

[12]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Constructive memory: The ghosts of past and future , 2007, Nature.

[13]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Spatial Distance and Mental Construal of Social Events , 2006, Psychological science.

[14]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Action induction through action observation , 2004, Psychological research.

[16]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  Stephen C. Want,et al.  How do children ape? Applying concepts from the study of non-human primates to the developmental study of 'imitation' in children , 2002 .

[18]  L Knuf,et al.  An analysis of ideomotor action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[20]  M. Tomasello.  The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition , 2000 .

[21]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  W. Prinz.  Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[24]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. , 1989 .

[25]  D. Schunk.  Peer Models and Children’s Behavioral Change , 1987 .

[26]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  A Theory Of Action Identification , 1985 .

[27]  R. Fisher.  Statistical methods for research workers , 1927, Protoplasma.

[28]  B. Elsner.  Infants' imitation of goal-directed actions: the role of movements and action effects. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[29]  Y. Trope,et al.  The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. , 1998 .

[30]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Fourteen-through 18-month-old infants di eren-tially imitate intentional and accidental actions , 1998 .

[31]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. , 1987 .

[32]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Vicarious Learning: The Influence of Modeling on Organizational Behavior , 1981 .

[33]  A. Bandura,et al.  Imitation of film-mediated agressive models. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.