The relative value of field survey and remote sensing for biodiversity assessment

1. The importance of habitat for biodiversity is well established, but the two most commonly used methods to measure habitat (field survey and remote sensing) have seldom been explicitly compared. 2. We compare high-resolution sample-based field survey (Countryside Survey) with medium-resolution remotely sensed habitat data (the highest resolution of Land Cover Map available) for Great Britain. Variation in abundance of 60 bird species from 335 1 km squares was modelled using habitat predictors from the two methods. Model comparisons assessed the explanatory power of (i) field survey vs. remotely sensed data and (ii) coarse information on habitat areas (Broad Habitats) vs. fine-grained information on Landscape Features. 3. Field survey data (combining Broad Habitat and Landscape Feature predictors) explained more variation in bird abundance than remotely sensed data (comprising Broad Habitat predictors only) for 57 species and had significantly higher mean explanatory power, averaged across 60 species models. The relative explanatory power of remote sensing, as a proportion of that provided by field data, was measured at 73%, aver aged across 60 species models. Predictions from field survey Broad Habitat data were more accurate than those from either remotely sensed Broad Habitat data or field survey Landscape Feature data, averaged across 60 species models. 4. High-resolution data generate more reliable models of predicted local population responses to land use change than lower resolution remotely sensed data. Collection of field data is typically costly in time, labour and resources, making use of remote sensing more feasible for assessment at larger spatial extents if data of equivalent value are produced, but the cost–benefit threshold between the two is likely to be context specific. However, integration of field survey with remotely sensed data provides accurate predictions of bird distributions, which suggests that both forms of data should be considered for future biodiversity surveys.

[1]  M. Brambilla,et al.  GIS-models work well, but are not enough: Habitat preferences of Lanius collurio at multiple levels and conservation implications , 2009 .

[2]  David C. Mason,et al.  Measurement of habitat predictor variables for organism-habitat models using remote sensing and image segmentation , 2003 .

[3]  C L Barnett,et al.  Estimating the extent and change in Broad Habitats in Great Britain. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  G. Brent Hall,et al.  Landscape resource mapping for wildlife research using very high resolution satellite imagery , 2013 .

[5]  Robin Fuller,et al.  Indices of bird-habitat preference from field surveys of birds and remote sensing of land cover: a study of south-eastern England with wider implications for conservation and biodiversity assessment , 2005 .

[6]  G. B. Groom,et al.  The integration of field survey and remote sensing for biodiversity assessment: a case study in the tropical forests and wetlands of Sango Bay, Uganda , 1998 .

[7]  J. Barlow,et al.  Assessing the utility of statistical adjustments for imperfect detection in tropical conservation science , 2014, The Journal of applied ecology.

[8]  Graham R. Martin,et al.  The use of Google EarthTM satellite imagery to detect the nests of masked boobies Sula dactylatra , 2011 .

[9]  S. Baillie,et al.  Large-scale habitat use of some declining British birds , 1998 .

[10]  J. Kerr,et al.  From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing , 2003 .

[11]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[12]  Roland Brandl,et al.  Assessing biodiversity by remote sensing in mountainous terrain: the potential of LiDAR to predict forest beetle assemblages , 2009 .

[13]  H. Schielzeth.  Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients , 2010 .

[14]  M J Dunbar,et al.  Measuring stock and change in the GB countryside for policy--key findings and developments from the Countryside Survey 2007 field survey. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  Mark J. Whittingham,et al.  Habitat selection by yellowhammers Emberiza citrinella on lowland farmland at two spatial scales: implications for conservation management , 2005 .

[16]  Jacques Baudry,et al.  Carabid assemblages in agricultural landscapes: impacts of habitat features, landscape context at different spatial scales and farming intensity , 2005 .

[17]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[18]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Scale in macroecology , 2002 .

[19]  R. Naiman,et al.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[20]  J. Krebs,et al.  Should conservation strategies consider spatial generality? Farmland birds show regional not national patterns of habitat association. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[21]  Elizabeth H A Mattison,et al.  Bridging the gaps between agricultural policy, land-use and biodiversity. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  W. Gould.  REMOTE SENSING OF VEGETATION, PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS, AND REGIONAL BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOTS , 2000 .

[23]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines , 2010, Science.

[24]  Richard A. Wadsworth,et al.  Final Report for LCM2007 - the new UK land cover map. Countryside Survey Technical Report No 11/07 , 2011 .

[25]  David A. Coomes,et al.  Applications of airborne lidar for the assessment of animal species diversity , 2014 .

[26]  H Nagendra,et al.  Biodiversity assessment at multiple scales: linking remotely sensed data with field information. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R. Fuller,et al.  Birds and habitat : relationships in changing landscapes , 2012 .

[28]  David Sheeren,et al.  Modeling bird communities using unclassified remote sensing imagery: Effects of the spatial resolution and data period , 2014 .

[29]  P. Mumby,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of remote sensing for tropical coastal resources assessment and management , 1999 .

[30]  T. Benton,et al.  Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? , 2003 .

[31]  Ned Horning,et al.  Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[32]  Mark E. Jakubauskas,et al.  A comparison of satellite data and landscape variables in predicting bird species occurrences in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  W. Sutherland,et al.  Landscape, cropping and field boundary influences on bird abundance , 2012 .

[34]  J Sheail,et al.  Assessing stock and change in land cover and biodiversity in GB: an introduction to Countryside Survey 2000. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  J. R. Treweek,et al.  Ecology and environmental impact assessment , 1996 .

[36]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Species distribution modelling for the people: unclassified landsat TM imagery predicts bird occurrence at fine resolutions , 2013 .