Validated System for Centralized Grading of Retinopathy of Prematurity: Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-Phase Retinopathy of Prematurity (e-ROP) Study.

IMPORTANCE Measurable competence derived from comprehensive and advanced training in grading digital images is critical in studies using a reading center to evaluate retinal fundus images from infants at risk for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Details of certification for nonphysician trained readers (TRs) have not yet been described. OBJECTIVE To describe a centralized system for grading ROP digital images by TRs in the Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-Phase Retinopathy of Prematurity (e-ROP) Study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter observational cohort study conducted from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2014. The TRs were trained by experienced ROP specialists and certified to detect ROP morphology in digital retinal images under supervision of an ophthalmologist reading center director. An ROP reading center was developed with standard hardware, secure Internet access, and customized image viewing software with an electronic grading form. A detailed protocol for grading was developed. Based on results of TR gradings, a computerized algorithm determined whether referral-warranted ROP (RW-ROP; defined as presence of plus disease, zone I ROP, and stage 3 or worse ROP) was present in digital images from infants with birth weight less than 1251 g enrolled from May 25, 2011, through October 31, 2013. Independent double grading was done by the TRs with adjudication of discrepant fields performed by the reading center director. EXPOSURE Digital retinal images. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Intragrader and intergrader variability and monitoring for temporal drift. RESULTS Four TRs underwent rigorous training and certification. A total of 5520 image sets were double graded, with 24.5% requiring adjudication for at least 1 component of RW-ROP. For individual RW-ROP components, the adjudication rate was 3.9% for plus disease, 12.4% for zone I ROP, and 16.9% for stage 3 or worse ROP. The weighted κ for intergrader agreement (n = 80 image sets) was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.52-0.93) for RW-ROP, 0.57 (95% CI, 0.37-0.77) for plus disease, 0.43 (95% CI, 0.24-0.63) for zone I ROP, and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47-0.88) for stage 3 or worse ROP. The weighted κ for grade-regrade agreement was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.57-0.97) for RW-ROP, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.67-1.00) for plus disease, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.51-0.90) for zone I ROP, and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.57-0.97) for stage 3 or worse ROP. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These data suggest that the e-ROP system for training and certifying nonphysicians to grade ROP images under the supervision of a reading center director reliably detects potentially serious ROP with good intragrader and intergrader consistency and minimal temporal drift.

[1]  Justin Starren,et al.  Telemedical diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity intraphysician agreement between ophthalmoscopic examination and image-based interpretation. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Graham E. Quinn,et al.  Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-phase Retinopathy of Prematurity: Study Design , 2014, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[3]  Clare M. Wilson,et al.  Telemedicine screening for retinopathy of prematurity in developing countries using digital retinal images: a feasibility project. , 2008, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[4]  Justin Starren,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of remote retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  Justin Starren,et al.  Telemedical diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity: accuracy of expert versus non-expert graders , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[6]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight. , 2001, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[7]  D. Kaufman,et al.  Plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: qualitative analysis of diagnostic process by experts. , 2012, JAMA ophthalmology.

[8]  Michael F Chiang,et al.  Agreement among pediatric ophthalmologists in diagnosing plus and pre-plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity. , 2008, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[9]  C. Gilbert,et al.  An update on progress and the changing epidemiology of causes of childhood blindness worldwide. , 2012, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[10]  P. L. Hildebrand,et al.  Validity of a telemedicine system for the evaluation of acute-phase retinopathy of prematurity. , 2014, JAMA ophthalmology.

[11]  Theodore Leng,et al.  Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): five years of screening with telemedicine. , 2014, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina.

[12]  Mathew Kurian,et al.  The KIDROP model of combining strategies for providing retinopathy of prematurity screening in underserved areas in India using wide-field imaging, tele-medicine, non-physician graders and smart phone reporting , 2014, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  Anna L. Ells,et al.  The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity revisited. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  Justin Starren,et al.  Telemedical retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: accuracy, reliability, and image quality. , 2007, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  Michael F Chiang,et al.  Interexpert agreement in the identification of macular location in infants at risk for retinopathy of prematurity. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  K. Murthy,et al.  Comparison of profile of retinopathy of prematurity in semiurban/rural and urban NICUs in Karnataka, India , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[17]  Penny Jennett,et al.  Telemedicine approach to screening for severe retinopathy of prematurity: a pilot study. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[18]  Michael F Chiang,et al.  Plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: an analysis of diagnostic performance. , 2007, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.