The perception of lightness in 3-D curved objects

Lightness constancy in complex scenes requires that the visual system take account of information concerning variations of illumination falling on visible surfaces. Three experiments on the perception of lightness for three-dimensional (3-D) curved objects show that human observers are better able to perform this accounting for certain scenes than for others. The experiments investigate the effect of object curvature, illumination direction, and object shape on lightness perception. Lightness constancy was quite good when a rich local gray-level context was provided. Deviations occurred when both illumination and reflectance changed along the surface of the objects. Does the perception of a 3-D surface and illuminant layout help calibrate lightness judgments? Our results showed a small but consistent improvement between lightness matches on ellipsoid shapes, relative to flat rectangle shapes, under illumination conditions that produce similar image gradients. Illumination change over 3-D forms is therefore taken into account in lightness perception.

[1]  S. Shevell,et al.  Lightness and brightness judgments of coplanar retinally noncontiguous surfaces. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  S. Bergström,et al.  Information about Three-Dimensional Shape and Direction of Illumination in a Square-Wave Grating , 1984, Perception.

[3]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Perceiving shape from shading. , 1988, Scientific American.

[4]  L. Arend,et al.  Lightness, brightness, and brightness contrast: 1. Illuminance variation , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of 1-D and 2-D brightness perception: A unified model of classical and recent phenomena , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  J. Frisby,et al.  Lightness Perception Can Be Affected by Surface Curvature from Stereopsis , 1994, Perception.

[7]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Determining lightness from an image , 1974, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[8]  P. Whittle.  Brightness, discriminability and the “Crispening Effect” , 1992, Vision Research.

[9]  K Nakayama,et al.  Toward a neural understanding of visual surface representation. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[10]  S. Bergström,et al.  Distinctness of perceived three-dimensional form induced by modulated illumination: Effects of certain display and modulation conditions , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  L. Arend,et al.  Simultaneous constancy, lightness, and brightness. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  D. Knill,et al.  Apparent surface curvature affects lightness perception , 1991, Nature.

[13]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  When does perceived lightness depend on perceived spatial arrangement? , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  J. Beck,et al.  APPARENT SPATIAL POSITION AND THE PERCEPTION OF LIGHTNESS. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  L. Arend,et al.  Lightness, brightness, and brightness contrast: 2. Reflectance variation , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  J. Beck,et al.  Apparent spatial arrangement and perceived brightness. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  E. Land,et al.  Lightness and retinex theory. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  J. Beck.  Surface color perception , 1972 .

[19]  A. Gilchrist.  Lightness contrast and failures of constancy: A common explanation , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  E. Wist.  Mach bands and depth adjacency , 1974 .

[21]  L. Arend,et al.  Perceived lightness, but not brightness, of achromatic surfaces depends on perceived depth information , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  D. Jameson,et al.  Complexities of perceived brightness. , 1961, Science.

[23]  L E Arend,et al.  Lightness and brightness over spatial illumination gradients. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  R. M. Evans.  The Perception of Color , 1974 .

[25]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  The classification and integration of edges as critical to the perception of reflectance and illumination , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Chapter 9 Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls , 1984 .

[27]  E. Wist,et al.  Evidence for the role of post-retinal processes in simultaneous contrast , 1973, Psychologische Forschung.

[28]  J J Koenderink,et al.  On So-Called Paradoxical Monocular Stereoscopy , 1994, Perception.

[29]  L. Arend,et al.  Illumination change at a depth edge can reduce lightness constancy , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  A. Gilchrist.  Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement. , 1977, Science.

[31]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  The ratio principle holds over a million-to-one range of illumination , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  G. Katona.  Color-contrast and color-constancy. , 1935 .

[33]  A. Gilchrist.  The perception of surface blacks and whites. , 1979, Scientific American.

[34]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[35]  H. Wallach.  Brightness constancy and the nature of achromatic colors. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  M. Landy,et al.  Transparency and the Cooperative Computation of Scene Attributes , 1991 .

[37]  S. Bergström.  Common and relative components of reflected light as information about the illumination, colour, and three-dimensional form of objects. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.