Evaluating the benefits of Octree-based indexing for LiDAR data

6 In recent years the geospatial domain has seen a significant increase in the availability of very large three7 dimensional (3D) point datasets. These datasets originate from a variety of sources, such as for example 8 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) or meteorological weather recordings. Increasingly, a desire 9 within the geospatial community has been expressed to exploit these types of 3D point data in a 10 meaningful engineering context that goes beyond mere visualization. However, current Spatial 11 Information Systems (SISs) provide only limited support for vast 3D point datasets. Even those systems 12 that advertise their support for in-built 3D data types provide very limited functionality to manipulate 13 such data types. In particular, an effective means of indexing large 3D point datasets is yet missing, 14 however it is crucial for effective analysis. Next to the large size of 3D point datasets they may also be 15 information rich, for example they may contain color information or some other associated semantic. This 16 paper presents an alternative spatial indexing technique, which is based on an octree data structure. We 17 show that it outperforms R-tree index, while being able to group 3D points based on their attribute values 18 at the same time. This paper presents an evaluation employing this octree spatial indexing technique and 19 successfully highlights its advantages for sparse as well as uniformly distributed data on the basis of an 20 extensive LiDAR dataset. 21

[1]  Michela Bertolotto,et al.  Storage, manipulation, and visualization of LiDAR data , 2009 .

[2]  Martin J. Baptist,et al.  Floodplain roughness parameterization using airborne laser scanning and spectral remote sensing , 2008 .

[3]  Michela Bertolotto,et al.  Three-Dimensional Spatial Information Systems: State of the Art Review , 2009 .

[4]  Shashi Shekhar,et al.  Spatial Databases: A Tour , 2003 .

[5]  Jantien E. Stoter,et al.  Modelling 3D spatial objects in a geo-DBMS using a 3D primitive , 2003, Computational Geosciences.

[6]  Falko Kuester,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning of Extended Cliff Sections in Dynamic Environments: Parameter Analysis , 2009 .

[7]  Antonin Guttman,et al.  R-trees: a dynamic index structure for spatial searching , 1984, SIGMOD '84.

[8]  Object-based and Image-based Image Representations , .

[9]  Hanan Samet,et al.  The Quadtree and Related Hierarchical Data Structures , 1984, CSUR.

[10]  Anu Pradhan,et al.  Evacuation Route Selection Based on Tree-Based Hazards Using Light Detection and Ranging and GIS , 2006 .

[11]  Daniel Clavet,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Canadian Digital Elevation Data using ICESat , 2009 .

[12]  Qing Zhu,et al.  An efficient 3D R-tree spatial index method for virtual geographic environments , 2007 .

[13]  Byeong-Seok Shin,et al.  An Efficient Point Rendering Using Octree and Texture Lookup , 2005, ICCSA.

[14]  Debra F. Laefer,et al.  Flight Optimization Algorithms for Aerial LiDAR Capture for Urban Infrastructure Model Generation , 2009 .

[15]  Hanan Samet,et al.  Spatial Data Structures , 1995, Modern Database Systems.

[16]  Euro Beinat,et al.  Pro Oracle Spatial for Oracle Database 11g (Expert's Voice in Oracle) , 2007 .

[17]  Kothuri Venkata Ravi Kanth,et al.  Quadtree and R-tree indexes in oracle spatial: a comparison using GIS data , 2002, SIGMOD '02.

[18]  Yuriy Reshetyuk,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning , 2009 .

[19]  A. Khattak,et al.  REMOTE SENSING (LIDAR) FOR MANAGEMENT OF HIGHWAY ASSETS FOR SAFETY , 2003 .

[20]  K. Halligan,et al.  A Comparison of Individual Tree and Forest Plot Height Derived from Lidar and InSAR , 2009 .

[21]  Anu Pradhan,et al.  Evacuation route selection based on tree-based hazards using LiDar and GIS , 2022 .

[22]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Small-footprint laser scanning simulator for system validation, error assessment, and algorithm development. , 2009 .

[23]  Leila De Floriani,et al.  A Hierarchical Spatial Index for Triangulated Surfaces , 2008, GRAPP.

[24]  Tamy Boubekeur,et al.  Volume‐Surface Trees , 2006, Comput. Graph. Forum.