Qualitative, Semi-Quantitative And, Quantitative Methods For Risk Assessment: Case Of The Financial Audit

Risk assessment is a critical step in achieving and defining the audit. Under these conditions, the concerns for developing the best methods in this field are varied. Both at practical and theoretical lev-el, in auditing, but also in other activities, are numerous qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative methods which try to estimate individual components of risk for a result to better reflect the reality. However, in our days, there is now a universally accepted method, able to predict and as-sess all events and actions carry risks. In this paper are presented, with examples, the three main categories of risk evaluation methods (quantitative and semi-quantitative and qualitative) and how they can be applied in auditing, trying to identify the method that best meets the actual requirements of a specific mission.

[1]  S. Cavalcante,et al.  A method for knowledge representation with automatic uncertainty embodiment , 2003, International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 2003.

[2]  Kari Sentz,et al.  Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory , 2002 .

[3]  P. Embrechts,et al.  Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools , 2005 .

[4]  Larry E. Rittenberg,et al.  Auditing and assurance services , 2012 .

[5]  Paul Embrechts,et al.  Quantitative Risk Management , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[6]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  Belief-Function Formulas for Audit Risk , 2008, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.