Evidential reasoning-based Fuzzy AHP approach for the evaluation of design alternatives' environmental performances

Abstract With the growing general awareness of the need to protect the environment as well as the increasingly stringent regulatory requirements imposed by various national and cross-national bodies, manufacturers have to minimise the environmental impacts of their products. Environmental considerations have therefore become a new key criterion for evaluating design alternatives during the product development stage. To facilitate non-Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) experts, such as most product designers, in evaluating the design alternatives in terms of environmental friendliness, this paper introduces a decision-making mechanism that combines the multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches with LCA methodology. This evidential reasoning-based approach is a fast-track and objective tool which ranks the available design alternatives according to their potential environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of design alternatives assessed by the LCA are used for the weight elicitation processes of the proposed approach. A case application is conducted to illustrate the use of the proposed method to evaluate the environmental performances of design alternatives.

[1]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[2]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[3]  Li Jian,et al.  Life Cycle Perspective and Life Cycle Assessment for Recycled Glass , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[4]  Massimo Tronci,et al.  Analytic Hierarchy Process of PILOT Eco-Design framework , 2011 .

[5]  Alev Taskin Gumus,et al.  Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Scott Duncan,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[7]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[8]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[9]  F. Chan,et al.  Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach , 2007 .

[10]  Randolph Kirchain,et al.  Comparative pavement life cycle assessment with parameter uncertainty , 2013 .

[11]  Metin Da ˘ gdeviren A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personnel selection in manufacturing systems , 2010 .

[12]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  Evidential reasoning approach for bridge condition assessment , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  C K Kwong,et al.  Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach , 2003 .

[14]  Jean Dezert,et al.  AHP and uncertainty theories for decision making using the ER-MCDA methodology , 2011 .

[15]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[16]  Jin Wang,et al.  Decision support framework for risk management on sea ports and terminals using fuzzy set theory and evidential reasoning approach , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Group-based ER-AHP system for product project screening , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[19]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision analysis using interval belief degrees , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Gang Liu,et al.  Assessment on green degree of biodegradable packaging material based on LCA and FAHP methodology , 2009 .

[21]  İrfan Ertuğrul,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection , 2008 .

[22]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personnel selection in manufacturing systems , 2010, J. Intell. Manuf..

[23]  Hing Kai Chan,et al.  An Extended Fuzzy-AHP Approach for the Evaluation of Green Product Designs , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[24]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[25]  Gabriela Benveniste,et al.  Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when ‘good enough’ is best , 2010 .

[26]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Predicting risk of water quality failures in distribution networks under uncertainties using fault-tree analysis , 2008 .

[27]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[28]  K. B. Chuah,et al.  Evaluation of Design Alternatives' Environmental Performance Using AHP and ER Approaches , 2014, IEEE Systems Journal.

[29]  M. Singh,et al.  An Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple-Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[30]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Evaluation methodologies for technology selection , 2000 .