An empirical assessment of the loose–tight leadership model: quantitative and qualitative analyses

Summary Using questionnaire and interview data, this study attempted to find out whether the organizational loose (participative) and tight (directive) practices are compatible with or contradict each other. Using the theoretical framework of Sagie’s (1997) loose–tight leadership approach, our hypotheses concerned the effects of both practices on the employee’s work-related attitudes, and the mediating role of two variables, cognitive (information sharing) and motivational (exerting effort), in these effects. Data were analysed using two methodological approaches, quantitative and qualitative. Based on a quantitative analysis of the questionnaires given to 101 professional employees of a textile company, partial support was provided for the study hypotheses. A qualitative analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews with all the employees (n ¼ 20) in one of the company divisions led to similar conclusions. Specifically, we found that although the loose and tight practices affected work attitudes, the interviewees attributed more impact to the tight practice. In addition, none of the study variables mediated the loose impact on attitudes, whereas information sharing (but not exerting effort) mediated the influence of tight practice. Finally, the qualitative analysis revealed a deeper insight into the nature of both leader practices and their possible integration in the decision-making processes in organizations. Copyright # 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[2]  M. Koslowsky,et al.  Participation and Empowerment in Organizations: Modeling, Effectiveness, and Applications , 1999 .

[3]  Vincent Cassar,et al.  Can leader direction and employee participation co‐exist?: Investigating interaction effects between participation and favourable work‐related attitudes among Maltese middle‐managers , 1999 .

[4]  Abraham Sagie,et al.  Employee Absenteeism, Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction: Another Look , 1998 .

[5]  Abraham Sagie,et al.  Leader Direction and Employee Participation in Decision Making: Contradictory or Compatible Practices? , 1997 .

[6]  A. Sagie.  Lead Article Leader Direction and Employee Participation in Decision Making: Contradictory or Compatible Practices? , 1997 .

[7]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Cognitive and motivational frameworks in U.S. research on participation: A meta-analysis of primary effects , 1997 .

[8]  Abraham Sagie,et al.  Effects of Leader's Communication Style and Participative Goal Setting on Performance and Attitudes , 1996 .

[9]  Meni Koslowsky,et al.  International Replication Note Decision Type, Organisational Control, and Acceptance of Change: An Integrative Approach to Participative Decision Making , 1996 .

[10]  G. Spreitzer.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[11]  Ian R. Gellatly,et al.  Individual and group determinants of employee absenteeism: Test of a causal model , 1995 .

[12]  Dov Elizur,et al.  Decision type, participative decision making (PDM), and organizational behavior: An experimental simulation , 1995 .

[13]  V. Vroom,et al.  Situation effects and levels of analysis in the study of leader participation , 1995 .

[14]  R. H. Waterman,et al.  In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-run Companies , 1995 .

[15]  F. Fiedler.  Cognitive Resources and Leadership Performance , 1995 .

[16]  Jay A. Conger,et al.  Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement , 1994 .

[17]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Participation's Effects On Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration Of Research Evidence , 1994 .

[18]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study , 1994 .

[19]  Meni Koslowsky,et al.  Organizational attitudes and behaviors as a function of participation in strategic and tactical change decisions: An application of path–goal theory† , 1994 .

[20]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Indirect leadership: Transformational leadership at a distance. , 1994 .

[21]  Karl W. Kuhnert.  Transforming leadership: Developing people through delegation. , 1994 .

[22]  J Hogan,et al.  What we know about leadership. Effectiveness and personality. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[23]  W. Borman,et al.  Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance , 1993 .

[24]  F. Fiedler,et al.  Cognitive resource theory and the utilization of the leader's and group members' technical competence , 1992 .

[25]  Tamar Katriel.  Communal Webs: Communication and Culture in Contemporary Israel , 1991 .

[26]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[27]  Dov Elizur,et al.  Effect of Participation in Strategic and Tactical Decisions on Acceptance of Planned Change. , 1990, The Journal of social psychology.

[28]  Michael T. Brannick,et al.  A role and expectancy model of participative decision-making: A replication and theoretical extension , 1990 .

[29]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[30]  Bernard M. Bass,et al.  Handbook of Leadership , 1990 .

[31]  L. Shore,et al.  Job and organizational attitudes in relation to employee behavioral intentions , 1990 .

[32]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[33]  F. Fiedler.  The Effective Utilization of Intellectual Abilities and Job‐relevant Knowledge in Group Performance: Cognitive Resource Theory and an Agenda for the Future , 1989 .

[34]  Koya Azumi,et al.  Suggestion rates and sociotechnical systems in Japanese versus American factories: beyond quality circles , 1988 .

[35]  M. Konovsky.  The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations , 1988 .

[36]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Determinants of Goal Commitment , 1988 .

[37]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Shared influence and organizational behavior: A meta-analysis of situational variables expected to moderate participation-outcome relationships. , 1987 .

[38]  Miriam Erez,et al.  Participative goal-setting: Social, motivational, and cognitive factors. , 1986 .

[39]  Noel M. Tichy,et al.  The Transformational Leader. , 1988 .

[40]  L. James,et al.  Mediators, Moderators, and Tests for Mediation. , 1984 .

[41]  G. Yukl,et al.  Leadership in Organizations , 1981 .

[42]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[43]  V. Vroom,et al.  Leadership and decision-making , 1975 .

[44]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Motivation and Participation: An Integration , 1973 .

[45]  R. J. House,et al.  A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness , 1971 .

[46]  A. Tannenbaum.  Control in Organizations , 1969 .

[47]  R. Campbell,et al.  A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. , 1968 .

[48]  D. Weiss,et al.  Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. , 1967 .

[49]  N. Maier.  Problem-solving discussions and conferences : leadership methods and skills , 1963 .

[50]  R. Likert,et al.  New Patterns of Management. , 1963 .

[51]  D. Mcgregor.  The Human Side of Enterprise , 1960 .