Modularity as an Entry Strategy: The invasion of new niches in the LAN equipment industry

This paper focuses on niche entry patterns in the LAN equipment industry in the 1990s. We analyze an original data-set of LAN equipment consisting of more than 1,000 hubs and switches marketed between 1990 and 1999. Modularity emerged as a design strategy that supported incumbent firms’ efforts to enter new product niches in the hub segment. However, after the emergence of switches as an alternative to hubs, coupled with the introduction of a new standard, incumbents relying on a modular hub strategy were overtaken by a new comer (Cisco). Moreover, the fastest followers were incumbents that had not previously relied on modular hub architectures. Our interpretation is as follows: modularity offers advantages of speed when changes occur within established boundaries. However, it also generates a ‘tunnel effect’ that prevents firms from developing products based on different problem-solving strategies. Such changes are more easily introduced by firms that do not rely on tightly-defined modular design rules.

[1]  B. Kogut,et al.  Open-source Software Development and Distributed Innovation , 2001 .

[2]  G. Swann Product Competition in Microprocessors , 1985 .

[3]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  Rapid Technical Change and the Speed of Lock-in: Standard Battles in the Local Area Network Industry in the 1990s , 2003 .

[4]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[5]  Daniel A. Levinthal The Slow Pace of Rapid Technological Change: Gradualism and Punctuation in Technological Change , 1998 .

[6]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[7]  Rikard Stankiewicz,et al.  The concept of “design space” , 2000 .

[8]  R. Langlois Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[9]  Melissa A. Schilling Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[10]  楠木 建,et al.  The modularity trap : innovation, technology phase-shifts, and resulting limits of virtual organizations , 1999 .

[11]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[12]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[13]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Platform Leadership How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation , 2002 .

[14]  R. Garud,et al.  Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of sun microsystems' open systems strategy , 1993 .

[15]  K. Frenken A fitness landscape approach to technological complexity, modularity, and vertical disintegration , 2006 .

[16]  Brad J. Cox,et al.  Object-oriented programming ; an evolutionary approach , 1986 .

[17]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on Technology. , 1978 .

[18]  L. Nesta,et al.  Product entry in a fast growing industry: the LAN switch market , 2006 .

[19]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .