Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors.

PURPOSE To compare the histologic prognostic feature of invasive breast cancer with mean stiffness as measured with shear-wave elastography. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study was exempted from ethical committee review. Patient consent for use of images for research was obtained. The study group comprised 101 consecutive women (age range, 38-91 years) with solid lesions identified during routine breast ultrasonography (US) performed between April 2010 and March 2011 and subsequently confirmed at histologic examination to be invasive cancers. Four elastographic images in two orthogonal planes were obtained of each lesion, and mean stiffness values were obtained from each image. Histologic findings following surgery were used for comparison, namely histologic grade, tumor type, invasive size, vascular invasion status, and lymph node status. Relationship between mean stiffness and histologic parameters was investigated by using a general linear model and multiple regression analysis. RESULTS High histologic grade (P < .0001), large invasive size (P < .0001), lymph node involvement (P < .0001), tumor type (P < .0001), and vascular invasion (P = .0077) all showed statistically significant positive association with high mean stiffness values. Multiple linear regression indicated that invasive size is the strongest pathologic determinant of mean stiffness (P < .0001), with histologic grade also having significant influence (P = .022). CONCLUSION In this study, breast cancers with higher mean stiffness values at shear-wave elastography had poorer prognostic features.

[1]  M Heller,et al.  Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[2]  Kim Thomson,et al.  Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[3]  M. Fink,et al.  Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging--preliminary results. , 2010, Radiology.

[4]  R. Mann.  The effectiveness of MR imaging in the assessment of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[5]  J. M. Pearson,et al.  Criteria for the safe avoidance of needle sampling in young women with solid breast masses. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[6]  Dae Young Seo,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer and correlation with prognostic factors , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[7]  E. Fleury,et al.  New elastographic classification of breast lesions during and after compression. , 2009, Diagnostic and interventional radiology.

[8]  I. O. Ellis,et al.  Sonographic correlations with the new molecular classification of invasive breast cancer , 2009, European Radiology.

[9]  J. Ryu,et al.  Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred? , 2008, Acta radiologica.

[10]  P. Burrows,et al.  Ultrasound diagnosis of fibroadenoma - is biopsy always necessary? , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[11]  T. Helbich,et al.  Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? , 2007, Radiology.

[12]  T. Matsumura,et al.  Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. , 2006, Radiology.

[13]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Mammographic, US, and MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer. , 2008, Radiology.

[14]  R. Birdwell,et al.  Probably Benign Breast Masses at US: Is Follow-up an Acceptable Alternative to Biopsy? , 2008 .

[15]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[16]  C. Wells,et al.  Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. , 2000, Clinical radiology.