Equivalent Number of Scatterers for SAR Speckle Modeling

In this paper, the equivalent number of scatterers of a rough scattering surface is defined, physically justified, and evaluated. New-generation spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sensors are acquiring images at such a high ground resolution that, quite often, the statistics of these images do not match with those predicted by the classical Rayleigh speckle model. Non-Rayleigh speckle is frequently mathematically modeled via K-distribution in terms of a parameter that presently can be estimated (i.e., a posteriori) on the SAR images and is linked to the number of scatterers per resolution cell. However, to model and predict (i.e., a priori) the statistical behavior of the SAR images, a full characterization of the scatterers is required. To this aim, the concept of equivalent number of scatterers of a rough scattering surface is here defined and physically justified. This parameter is then analytically evaluated in closed form as a function of the roughness of the illuminated surface and of SAR sensor parameters. The presented analytical evaluation applies to both classical and fractal descriptions of the surface roughness. Finally, the dependence of the equivalent number of scatterers on the roughness of the illuminated surface and on SAR sensor parameters is analyzed for a range of values of roughness parameters actually encountered in natural surfaces and by considering typical system parameters of modern high-resolution spaceborne SAR systems. It is shown that, actually, for some combinations of realistic surface and system parameters, the equivalent number of scatterers can be on the order of unity.

[1]  Anthony W. England,et al.  Special problems in the estimation of power-law spectra as applied to topographical modeling , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Richard K. Moore,et al.  Microwave Remote Sensing , 1999 .

[3]  Antonio Iodice,et al.  Imaging of Fractal Profiles , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Aarnout Brombacher,et al.  Probability... , 2009, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[5]  Bruce A. Campbell,et al.  Scale-Dependent Surface Roughness Behavior and Its Impact on Empirical Models for Radar Backscatter , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  C. Oliver A Model for Non-Rayleigh Scattering Statistics , 1984 .

[7]  P. Beckmann,et al.  The scattering of electromagnetic waves from rough surfaces , 1963 .

[8]  Jiancheng Shi,et al.  Estimation of bare surface soil moisture and surface roughness parameter using L-band SAR image data , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  J. Goodman Some fundamental properties of speckle , 1976 .

[10]  Wolfgang Dierking,et al.  Quantitative roughness characterization of geological surfaces and implications for radar signature analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Giorgio Franceschetti,et al.  Scattering, Natural Surfaces, and Fractals , 2006 .

[12]  C. Sparrow The Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[13]  Kamal Sarabandi,et al.  An empirical model and an inversion technique for radar scattering from bare soil surfaces , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Richard K. Moore,et al.  Microwave Remote Sensing, Active and Passive , 1982 .

[15]  E. Jakeman,et al.  A model for non-Rayleigh sea echo , 1976 .

[16]  T. Farr,et al.  The roughness of natural terrain: A planetary and remote sensing perspective , 2001 .

[17]  Qin Li,et al.  A generalized power law spectrum and its applications to the backscattering of soil surfaces based on the integral equation model , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Giorgio Franceschetti,et al.  A SAR processor based on two-dimensional FFT codes , 1990 .

[19]  J. Kong Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves , 2021, Principles of Scattering and Transport of Light.

[20]  Stephen R. Brown,et al.  Broad bandwidth study of the topography of natural rock surfaces , 1985 .

[21]  Daniele Riccio,et al.  SAR Imaging of Fractal Surfaces , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  M. Zribi,et al.  Characterisation of the Soil Structure and Microwave Backscattering Based on Numerical Three-Dimensional Surface Representation: Analysis with a Fractional Brownian Model , 2000 .

[23]  S. Krantz Fractal geometry , 1989 .

[24]  Yisok Oh,et al.  Condition for precise measurement of soil surface roughness , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  Kazuo Ouchi,et al.  Dependence of Speckle Statistics on Backscatter Cross-Section Fluctuations in Synthetic Aperture Radar Images of Rough Surfaces , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  W. G. Rees Condition for Precise Measurement of Soil Surface Roughness , 1998 .

[27]  R. Sayles,et al.  Surface topography as a nonstationary random process , 1978, Nature.

[28]  Donald B. Percival,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of K distribution parameters for SAR data , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[30]  G. Franceschetti,et al.  Scattering from natural rough surfaces modeled by fractional Brownian motion two-dimensional processes , 1999 .

[31]  J. Jao Amplitude distribution of composite terrain radar clutter and the κ-Distribution , 1984 .