Estimating earthquake-induced failure probability and downtime of critical facilities.

Fault trees have long been used to estimate failure risk in earthquakes, especially for nuclear power plants (NPPs). One interesting application is that one can assess and manage the probability that two facilities - a primary and backup - would be simultaneously rendered inoperative in a single earthquake. Another is that one can calculate the probabilistic time required to restore a facility to functionality, and the probability that, during any given planning period, the facility would be rendered inoperative for any specified duration. A large new peer-reviewed library of component damageability and repair-time data for the first time enables fault trees to be used to calculate the seismic risk of operational failure and downtime for a wide variety of buildings other than NPPs. With the new library, seismic risk of both the failure probability and probabilistic downtime can be assessed and managed, considering the facility's unique combination of structural and non-structural components, their seismic installation conditions, and the other systems on which the facility relies. An example is offered of real computer data centres operated by a California utility. The fault trees were created and tested in collaboration with utility operators, and the failure probability and downtime results validated in several ways.

[1]  Mary C. Comerio,et al.  Estimating Downtime from Data on Residential Buildings after the Northridge and Loma Prieta Earthquakes , 2010 .

[2]  K. Tierney.  Impacts of Recent U.S. Disasters on Businesses: The 1993 Midwest Floods and the 1994 Northridge Earthquake , 1995 .

[3]  Judith Mitrani-Reiser,et al.  AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION: PROBABILISTIC LOSS ESTIMATION FOR PERFORMANCE - BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING , 2007 .

[4]  Ajit Srividya,et al.  Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  B. G. Jones.  Economic Consequences of Earthquakes: Preparing for the Unexpected , 1997 .

[6]  Julie Barnett,et al.  Added value in fault tree analyses , 2008 .

[7]  Gayle S. Johnson,et al.  Fragility of Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing Equipment , 2010 .

[8]  Lars Rosén,et al.  Added value in fault tree analysis , 2008 .

[9]  Gary J. Powers,et al.  Fault TreesߞA State of the Art Discussion , 1974 .

[10]  Mary C. Comerio,et al.  Estimating Downtime in Loss Modeling , 2006 .

[11]  Robert E. Bachman,et al.  Creating Fragility Functions for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2007 .

[12]  W E Vesely,et al.  Fault Tree Handbook , 1987 .

[13]  Nitin Gupta,et al.  Hazard Calculations for the WGCEP-2002 Earthquake Forecast Using OpenSHA and Distributed Object Technologies , 2005 .

[14]  F. Imamura,et al.  The 869 Jogan tsunami deposit and recurrence interval of large-scale tsunami on the Pacific coast of northeast Japan , 2001 .

[15]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[16]  Saul Levine,et al.  Important Event-Tree and Fault-Tree Considerations in the Reactor Safety Study , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[17]  R. E. Sheppard,et al.  Seismic Reliability Assessment of Critical Facilities: A Handbook, Supporting Documentation, and Model Code Provisions , 1999 .