Risk Factors for Failure of Locked Plate Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures: An Analysis of 335 Cases

Objectives: Locked plating has become a standard method to treat supracondylar femur fractures. Emerging evidence indicates that this method of treatment is associated with modest failure rates. The goals of this study were to determine risk factors for complications and to provide technical recommendations for locked plating of supracondylar femur fractures. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Three level I or II trauma centers. Patients/participants: Three hundred twenty-six patients with 335 distal femur fractures (OTA 33A or C, 33% open) treated with lateral locked plates were studied. The average patient age was 57 years (range 17–97 years), 55% were women, 34% were obese, 19% were diabetic, and 24% were smokers. Intervention: All patients were managed with open reduction internal fixation using a lateral distal femoral locked plate construct that included locked screws in the distal fragment and nonlocked, locked, or a combination of locked and nonlocked screws in the proximal fragment. Main Outcome Measurements: Risk factors for reoperation to promote union, deep infection, and implant failure. Results: After the index procedure, 64 fractures (19%) required reoperation to promote union, including 30 that had a planned staged bone grafting because of the metaphyseal defect after debridement of an open fracture. Independent risk factors for reoperation to promote union and deep infection included diabetes and open fracture. Risk factors for proximal implant failure included open fracture, smoking, increased body mass index, and shorter plate length. Conclusions: The identified risk factors for reoperation to promote union and complications included open fracture, diabetes, smoking, increased body mass index, and shorter plate length. Most factors are out of surgeon control but are useful when considering prognosis. Use of relatively long plates is a technical factor that can reduce risk for fixation failure. Level of Evidence: Prognostic level II. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  D. N. Williams,et al.  Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. , 1984, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  Roy Sanders,et al.  Minimal Versus Maximal Plate Fixation Techniques of the Ulna: The Biomechanical Effect of Number of Screws and Plate Length , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[3]  L. Audigé,et al.  Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee. , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[4]  J. Kellam,et al.  Comparative biomechanical analysis of supracondylar femur fracture fixation: locked intramedullary nail versus 95-degree angled plate. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[5]  J. Delee,et al.  Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur treated with a supracondylar plate and lag screw. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  Hsuan-Ti Huang,et al.  Indirect reduction and bridge plating of supracondylar fractures of the femur. , 2003, Injury.

[7]  A. Simpson,et al.  Inhibition of fracture healing. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  I. Harris,et al.  RETROGRADE NAILING VERSUS FIXED‐ANGLE BLADE PLATING FOR SUPRACONDYLAR FEMORAL FRACTURES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL , 2006, ANZ journal of surgery.

[9]  M. Bottlang,et al.  Locked Plating of Distal Femur Fractures Leads to Inconsistent and Asymmetric Callus Formation , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[10]  M. Bottlang,et al.  2010 Mid-America Orthopaedic Association Physician in Training Award: Healing Complications Are Common After Locked Plating for Distal Femur Fractures , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  William M. Ricci,et al.  Locked Plates Combined With Minimally Invasive Insertion Technique for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femur Fractures Above a Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  Philip J. Kregor,et al.  Treatment of Distal Femur Fractures Using the Less Invasive Stabilization System: Surgical Experience and Early Clinical Results in 103 Fractures , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[13]  G. Kumar,et al.  Prevention of Infection in the Treatment of One Thousand and Twenty-Five Open Fractures of Long Bones. Retrospective and Prospective Analyses , 2014 .

[14]  J Cordey,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of the Less Invasive Stabilization System for the Internal Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[15]  C. Sommer,et al.  Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. , 2003, Injury.

[16]  W. Ricci,et al.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures. , 2009, Instructional course lectures.

[17]  C Krettek,et al.  Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. , 2001, Injury.

[18]  M. Gardner,et al.  Are extreme distal periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur too distal to fix using a lateral locked plate? , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  M. Bolander,et al.  Defects of early fracture-healing in experimental diabetes. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  Mohit Bhandari,et al.  Operative Treatment of Acute Distal Femur Fractures: Systematic Review of 2 Comparative Studies and 45 Case Series (1989 to 2005) , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[21]  B. L. Davison.  Varus collapse of comminuted distal femur fractures after open reduction and internal fixation with a lateral condylar buttress plate. , 2003, American journal of orthopedics.

[22]  A. Ploumis,et al.  Supracondylar femoral fractures in elderly patients treated with the dynamic condylar screw and the retrograde intramedullary nail: a comparative study of the two methods , 2005, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[23]  B. Levy,et al.  Results of polyaxial locked-plate fixation of periarticular fractures of the knee. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  H. Vallier,et al.  Comparison of the 95-Degree Angled Blade Plate and the Locking Condylar Plate for the Treatment of Distal Femoral Fractures , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[25]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Double-plating of comminuted, unstable fractures of the distal part of the femur. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  J. Borrelli,et al.  Operative management of periprosthetic femur fractures in the elderly using biological fracture reduction and fixation techniques. , 2007, Injury.

[27]  M. Zlowodzki,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system and the 95-degree angled blade plate for the internal fixation of distal femur Fractures in human cadaveric bones with high bone mineral density. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[28]  Hall Mf.  Two-plane fixation of acute supracondylar and intracondylar fractures of the femur. , 1978 .

[29]  P. D. Levin.  Reconstruction of the patellar tendon using a dacron graft: a case report. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  F. Kummer,et al.  Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of the standard condylar buttress plate, a locked buttress plate, and the 95-degree blade plate. , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[31]  L. Cozen.  Does Diabetes Delay Fracture Healing? , 1972, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  R. Loder,et al.  The influence of diabetes mellitus on the healing of closed fractures. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  M. Zlowodzki,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of the Less Invasive Stabilization System, Angled Blade Plate, and Retrograde Intramedullary Nail for the Internal Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[34]  N. Südkamp,et al.  Femur–LISS and Distal Femoral Nail for Fixation of Distal Femoral Fractures: Are There Differences in Outcome and Complications? , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  Ulrich Dieter,et al.  Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? , 2003, Injury.

[36]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Femoral Biologic Plate Fixation , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.