Target and nontarget grouping in visual search

Results recently reported by Driver, McLeod, and Dienes (1992) are used to contrast three accounts of visual search—in particular, their mechanism for easy conjunction search. In the Driver et al. study, the target was defined by a conjunction of form and movement; the key manipulation was phase in both target and nontarget motion sets. Mechanisms working separately on each display element (inhibition from nontarget features, facilitation from target features) are unable to explain large effects of phase, since this is defined only by relationships between one element and another. As implemented in the guided search model of Cave and Wolfe (1990), local suppression between similar elements is also unable to account for the results. More promising is an approach based on perceptual grouping: Elements moving in phase can be selected (target motion) or rejected (nontarget motion) as a group. Rather than a bias against elements that are similar to or grouped with their neighbors, there is a bias to treat grouped elements together.

[1]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[2]  I. Gordon.  Interactions between items in visual search. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Configurational effects in visual information processing , 1976 .

[4]  J. Duncan.  The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980 .

[5]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  E. Farmer,et al.  Visual search through color displays: Effects of target-background similarity and background uniformity , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  A. Treisman.  Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  C Bundesen,et al.  Color segregation and visual search , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  B. Julesz,et al.  Detection versus Discrimination of Visual Orientation , 1984, Perception.

[10]  S. Ullman.  Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[11]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[13]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[15]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption , 1989 .

[16]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[17]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[18]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited , 1990 .

[19]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  P. McLeod,et al.  Filtering by movement in visual search. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  P. McLeod,et al.  Motion coherence and conjunction search: Implications for guided search theory , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.