Distributed collaborative situation-map making for disaster response

A situation map that shows the overview of a disaster situation serves as a valuable tool for disaster response teams. It helps them to orientate their location and to make disaster response decisions. It is, however, a complicated task to rapidly generate a complete and comprehensive situation map of a disaster area, particularly due to the centralized organization of disaster management and the limited emergency services. In this study, we propose to let the affected population be utilised as an additional resource that can actively help to make such a situation map. The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of constructing a shared situation map using a collaborative distributed mechanism. By examining earlier research, a detailed list of potential problems is identified in the collaborative map-making process. These problems were then addressed in an experiment which evaluated a number of proposed solutions. The results showed that more collaboration channels led to a situation map of better quality, and that including confidence information for objects and events in the map helped the discussion process during the map-making.

[1]  Jonas Landgren,et al.  Designing Information Technology for Emergency Response , 2007 .

[2]  Gary Klein,et al.  Making Sense of Sensemaking 2: A Macrocognitive Model , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[3]  T. Drabek,et al.  Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: lessons, trends and opportunities from the research literature , 2003 .

[4]  Dennis E. Wenger,et al.  Disaster Analysis: Emergency Management Offices and Arrangements. , 1987 .

[5]  Leo Postman,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF RUMOR , 1946 .

[6]  Zhenke Yang,et al.  Developing Concept-Based User Interface using Icons for Reporting Observations , 2008 .

[7]  Russell R. Dynes,et al.  Community Emergency Planning: False Assumptions and Inappropriate Analogies , 1994, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[8]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Collaborative situational mapping during emergency response , 2009, ECCE.

[9]  D. Neal,et al.  Effective emergency management: reconsidering the bureaucratic approach. , 1995, Disasters.

[10]  D. Guha-Sapir,et al.  Thirty years of natural disasters 1974-2003: The numbers , 2004 .

[11]  E. Quarantelli.  Disaster Related Social Behavior: Summary of 50 Years of Research Findings , 1999 .

[12]  E. Quarantelli.  Research Findings on Organizational Behavior in Disasters and Their Applicability in Developing Countries , 1986 .

[13]  Léon J. M. Rothkrantz,et al.  Dynamic Scripting in Crisis Environments , 2007, HCI.

[14]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Effect of map sharing and confidence information in situation-map making , 2010, ECCE.

[15]  M. Carey.  Comment: Concerns in the Analysis of Focus Group Data , 1995 .

[16]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness , 2010, CHI.

[17]  Tjerk de Greef,et al.  Distilling Support Opportunities to Improve Urban Search and Rescue Missions , 2009, HCI.

[18]  M. Goodchild.  Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[19]  H. T. Buckner,et al.  A THEORY OF RUMOR TRANSMISSION , 1965 .