Behaviour of MRP, Kanban, CONWIP and DBR under dynamic environmental variability

The choice of a Production Planning and Control (PPC) method can be classified as strategic and the required continuous parameterisation issues as tactical. This continuous parameterisation after implementation of a PPC system is often ignored because it requires planning expertise and is time consuming. The effect of not fulfilling these tactical issues, which results in not adapting the PPC parameters to changed environmental influences, is evaluated in this study. Therefore the behaviour of Material Requirements Planning (MRP), Kanban, Constant Work in Process (CONWIP) and Drum Buffer Rope (DBR) under dynamic environments is evaluated in a simulation model, where a high service level at a low WIP is defined as desirable. The environment is described by means of variability of Mean Time To Repair (MTTR), setup time, machine availability, scrap rate and demand.

[1]  Joseph A. Orlicky,et al.  Material Requirements Planning: The New Way of Life in Production and Inventory Management , 1975 .

[2]  Donald R. Smith,et al.  Understanding the fundamentals of Kanban and CONWIP pull systems using simulation , 2001, Proceeding of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference (Cat. No.01CH37304).

[3]  Latif A. Al-Hakim,et al.  MRP: an adaptive approach , 1991 .

[4]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[5]  Shie-Gheun Koh,et al.  Comparison of DBR with CONWIP in an unbalanced production line with three stations , 2004 .

[6]  Asbjoern M. Bonvik,et al.  A comparison of production-line control mechanisms , 1997 .

[7]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Factory physics : foundations of manufacturing management , 1996 .

[8]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Short-term robustness of production management systems: A case study , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Gerhard Plenert,et al.  Focusing material requirements planning (MRP) towards performance , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Norman M. Sadeh,et al.  An empirical study of policies to integrate reactive scheduling and control in just-in-time job shop environments , 2004 .

[11]  Daisuke Hirotani,et al.  Comparing CONWIP, synchronized CONWIP, and Kanban in complex supply chains , 2005 .

[12]  A. Huber,et al.  Service-level performance of MRP, kanban, CONWIP and DBR due to parameter stability and environmental robustness , 2008 .

[13]  Dingwei Wang,et al.  A simulation and comparative study of the CONWIP, Kanban and MRP production control systems in a cold rolling plant , 1998 .

[14]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  CONWIP: a pull alternative to kanban , 1990 .