QOS Analysis in IEEE 802. 15. 4 and Impact of Flag Mobility on Network Performance in WSN

Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) consists of large number of sensor nodes that are capable of communication, computation and sensing. Inherent limitations of WSN include limited storage, processing and transmission power. As compared to other network topologies, WSN has less communication Protocols mainly Zigbee/IEEE 802.15.4. IEEE 802.15.4 is a new standard, uniquely designed for low rate Wireless Personal Area Network (LR-WPAN), which is developed for applications that demand low throughput. IEEE 802.15.4 was designed for short range, low power, low complexity, low rate and low cost wireless network which provides two way wireless communication technology. For the analysis purpose, we have considered AODV as the Adhoc-routing protocol. Simulation has been carried out by using Qualnet Simulator 6.1. In this paper, we proposed a mobility control scheme and the impact of mobility over the performance of WSN is seen. In this paper, we have designed two scenarios, one is used with Random waypoint Mobility and the other is used by Mobility with Flag. Results of both the mobility schemes are compared to find out which mobility scheme gives overall best services. This paper provides the performance evaluation of quality of service parameters such as total packets received, received throughput, average end to end delay, average jitter and energy consumption as the performance metrics.

[1]  S. Singh,et al.  Scenario Based Analysis of AODV and DSR Protocols Under Mobility in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Advances in Mobile Network, Communication and Its Applications.

[2]  Sinem Coleri Ergen,et al.  ZigBee/IEEE 802.15.4 Summary , 2004 .

[3]  Rajeev Paulus,et al.  Analyzing the Effect of Varying CBR on AODV, DSR, IERP Routing Protocols in MANET , 2013 .

[4]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[5]  Ajay Kumar Sharma,et al.  Performance Analysis and Mobility Management in Wireless Sensor Network , 2013 .

[6]  Myung J. Lee,et al.  A Comprehensive Performance Study of IEEE 802 . 15 . 4 , 2004 .

[7]  Majid Bayani Abbasy,et al.  Single-Sink Mobility Performance Analysis on a Wireless Senosr Networks , 2013, 2013 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[8]  Vinay Kumar,et al.  Performance of Routing Protocols for Beacon-Enabled IEEE 802.15.4 WSNs with Different Duty Cycle , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Devices and Communications (ICDeCom).

[9]  Rajeev Paulus,et al.  Performance Comparison of AODV, DSR and LAR1 in Mobile Ad-hoc Network based on Simulation Time , 2013 .

[10]  Yi Sun,et al.  Performance Analysis of Wireless Sensor Network Based on OPNET , 2013 .

[11]  S. K. Patra,et al.  Quality of service analysis in IEEE 802.15.4 mesh networks using MANET routing , 2010, 2010 Second International conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies.

[12]  M. M. Chandane,et al.  Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.15.4 , 2012 .