Opinion Dynamics Optimization by Varying Susceptibility to Persuasion via Non-Convex Local Search

A long line of work in social psychology has studied variations in people’s susceptibility to persuasion—the extent to which they are willing to modify their opinions on a topic. This body of literature suggests an interesting perspective on theoretical models of opinion formation by interacting parties in a network: in addition to considering interventions that directly modify people’s intrinsic opinions, it is also natural to consider interventions that modify people’s susceptibility to persuasion. In this work, motivated by this fact, we propose an influence optimization problem. Specifically, we adopt a popular model for social opinion dynamics, where each agent has some fixed innate opinion, and a resistance that measures the importance it places on its innate opinion; agents influence one another’s opinions through an iterative process. Under certain conditions, this iterative process converges to some equilibrium opinion vector. For the unbudgeted variant of the problem, the goal is to modify the resistance of any number of agents (within some given range) such that the sum of the equilibrium opinions is minimized; for the budgeted variant, in addition the algorithm is given upfront a restriction on the number of agents whose resistance may be modified. We prove that the objective function is in general non-convex. Hence, formulating the problem as a convex program as in an early version of this work (Abebe et al., KDD’18) might have potential correctness issues. We instead analyze the structure of the objective function, and show that any local optimum is also a global optimum, which is somehow surprising as the objective function might not be convex. Furthermore, we combine the iterative process and the local search paradigm to design very efficient algorithms that can solve the unbudgeted variant of the problem optimally on large-scale graphs containing millions of nodes. Finally, we propose and evaluate experimentally a family of heuristics for the budgeted variant of the problem.

[1]  Ambuj K. Singh,et al.  Fighting Opinion Control in Social Networks via Link Recommendation , 2019, KDD.

[2]  John Wright,et al.  A Geometric Analysis of Phase Retrieval , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).

[3]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  {SNAP Datasets}: {Stanford} Large Network Dataset Collection , 2014 .

[4]  R. Petty,et al.  What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: the effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Boris E. R. de Ruyter,et al.  Can You Be Persuaded? Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Persuasion , 2009, INTERACT.

[6]  T-H. Hubert Chan,et al.  On the Hardness of Opinion Dynamics Optimization with L1-Budget on Varying Susceptibility to Persuasion , 2021, COCOON.

[7]  Yogesh V. Joshi,et al.  Turf Wars: Product Line Strategies in Competitive Markets , 2015, Mark. Sci..

[8]  Solomon E. Asch,et al.  Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955 .

[9]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Source Credibility and Attitude Certainty: A Metacognitive Analysis of Resistance to Persuasion , 2004 .

[10]  Yansong Hu,et al.  Nonmonotonic Status Effects in New Product Adoption , 2014, Mark. Sci..

[11]  Charalampos E. Tsourakakis,et al.  Opinion Dynamics with Varying Susceptibility to Persuasion , 2018, KDD.

[12]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Learning Linear Influence Models in Social Networks from Transient Opinion Dynamics , 2019, ACM Trans. Web.

[13]  Edith G. Smit,et al.  Strategies and motives for resistance to persuasion: an integrative framework , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[14]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: Science and practice, 3rd ed. , 1993 .

[15]  R. Srikant,et al.  Opinion dynamics in social networks: A local interaction game with stubborn agents , 2012, 2013 American Control Conference.

[16]  G. Giovino,et al.  Effects of Anti-Smoking Advertising on Youth Smoking: A Review , 2003, Journal of health communication.

[17]  Renato Paes Leme,et al.  Role of conformity in opinion dynamics in social networks , 2014, COSN '14.

[18]  Mehmet E. Yildiz,et al.  Binary Opinion Dynamics with Stubborn Agents , 2013, TEAC.

[19]  Anastasios Kyrillidis,et al.  Non-square matrix sensing without spurious local minima via the Burer-Monteiro approach , 2016, AISTATS.

[20]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network , 2003, KDD '03.

[21]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being: Setting the Scene , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[22]  Abhimanyu Das,et al.  Debiasing social wisdom , 2013, KDD.

[23]  W. Evans,et al.  Measuring Peer Group Effects: A Study of Teenage Behavior , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  John Wright,et al.  Complete Dictionary Recovery Over the Sphere I: Overview and the Geometric Picture , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[25]  Furong Huang,et al.  Escaping From Saddle Points - Online Stochastic Gradient for Tensor Decomposition , 2015, COLT.

[26]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Mitigating Overexposure in Viral Marketing , 2017, AAAI.

[27]  T.-H. Hubert Chan,et al.  Revisiting Opinion Dynamics with Varying Susceptibility to Persuasion via Non-Convex Local Search , 2019, WWW.

[28]  Charalampos E. Tsourakakis,et al.  Minimizing Polarization and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2017, WWW.

[29]  Giacomo Como,et al.  From local averaging to emergent global behaviors: The fundamental role of network interconnections , 2016, Syst. Control. Lett..

[30]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[31]  Tengyu Ma,et al.  Matrix Completion has No Spurious Local Minimum , 2016, NIPS.

[32]  Nathan Srebro,et al.  Global Optimality of Local Search for Low Rank Matrix Recovery , 2016, NIPS.

[33]  M. Degroot.  Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[34]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.

[35]  Kamesh Munagala,et al.  Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks , 2014, WSDM.

[36]  Prateek Jain,et al.  Non-convex Optimization for Machine Learning , 2017, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[37]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Age differences in resistance to peer influence. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[38]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  How to Escape Saddle Points Efficiently , 2017, ICML.

[39]  R. Cialdini.  The Science of PERSUASION. , 2001 .

[40]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  An Integrative Framework for Understanding Two-sided Persuasion , 1994 .

[41]  J. Allen,et al.  Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: Susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability, and depression , 2006, Development and Psychopathology.

[42]  C. Heath,et al.  Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains , 2007 .

[43]  P. Hartman.  On functions representable as a difference of convex functions , 1959 .

[44]  T E Dielman,et al.  Susceptibility to peer pressure as an explanatory variable for the differential effectiveness of an alcohol misuse prevention program in elementary schools. , 1992, The Journal of school health.

[45]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  How Bad is Forming Your Own Opinion? , 2011, 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[46]  Jacob R. Neiheisel,et al.  On the Limits of Persuasion: Campaign Ads and the Structure of Voters’ Interpersonal Discussion Networks , 2015 .

[47]  Aristides Gionis,et al.  Opinion Maximization in Social Networks , 2013, SDM.

[48]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Dynamics and Learning in Social Networks , 2010, Dyn. Games Appl..