Air Quality at Bus Stops

Congested traffic corridors in dense urban areas are key contributors to the degradation of urban air quality. While waiting at bus stops, transit patrons may be exposed to greater amounts of vehicle-based pollution, including particulate matter (PM), because of their proximity to the roadway. Current guidelines for the location and the design of bus stops do not take into account air quality or exposure considerations. This study compared the exposure of transit riders waiting at three-sided bus stop shelters that either faced the roadway traffic or faced away from the roadway traffic. Shelters were instrumented with air quality monitoring equipment, sonic anemometers, and vehicle counters. Data were collected for 2 days at three shelters during both the morning and the afternoon peak periods. Bus shelter orientation was found to significantly affect concentration of four sizes of PM: ultrafine particles, PM1, PM2.5, and PM10. Shelters with an opening oriented toward the roadway were consistently observed to have higher concentrations inside the shelter than outside the shelter. In contrast, shelters oriented away from the roadway were observed to have lower concentrations inside the shelter than outside the shelter. The differences in PM concentration were statistically significant across all four sizes of particulate matter studied. Traffic flow was shown to have a significant relationship with all sizes of particulate concentration levels inside bus shelters. Microscale anemometer measurements were made next to bus shelters. Both wind speed and direction were shown to affect particulate concentrations differently, depending on shelter orientation.

[1]  C. Y. Chan,et al.  Commuter exposure to particulate matter in public transportation modes in Hong Kong , 2002 .

[2]  R. Colvile,et al.  Fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Britt A. Holmén,et al.  Modal Analysis of Vehicle Operation and Particulate Emissions from Connecticut Transit Buses , 2009 .

[4]  A. Stern Fundamentals of air pollution , 1973 .

[5]  Manfred Neuberger,et al.  Reducing ambient levels of fine particulates could substantially improve health: a mortality impact assessment for 26 European cities , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[6]  D. Kittelson Engines and nanoparticles: a review , 1998 .

[7]  David Briggs,et al.  Personal exposure to particulate air pollution in transport microenvironments , 2004 .

[8]  Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Fine particle (PM2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  Kees de Hoogh,et al.  Effects of travel mode on exposures to particulate air pollution. , 2008, Environment international.

[10]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Concentrations of submicrometre particles from vehicle emissions near a major road , 2000 .

[11]  Thomas Götschi,et al.  Urban background particulate matter and allergic sensitization in adults of ECRHS II. , 2007, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[12]  C. Kennes,et al.  Fundamentals of Air Pollution , 2001 .

[14]  S. Kaura,et al.  Pedestrian exposure to air pollution along a major road in Central London , UK , 2005 .

[15]  F. Dominici,et al.  Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Chang-Chuan Chan,et al.  The effect of urban air pollution on inflammation, oxidative stress, coagulation, and autonomic dysfunction in young adults. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[17]  M. Townes TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops , 2000 .

[18]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  A Comparison of Emissions and Fuel Economy from Hybrid-Electric and Conventional-Drive Transit Buses , 2004 .

[19]  Christopher M. Monsere,et al.  Impact of Bicycle Lane Characteristics on Exposure of Bicyclists to Traffic-Related Particulate Matter , 2011 .

[20]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Study of ultrafine particles near a major highway with heavy-duty diesel traffic , 2002 .

[21]  Steffen Loft,et al.  Personal Exposure to Ultrafine Particles and Oxidative DNA Damage , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[22]  Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al.  Fine particulate matter and carbon monoxide exposure concentrations in urban street transport microenvironments , 2007 .

[23]  Steffen Loft,et al.  Air pollution, oxidative damage to DNA, and carcinogenesis. , 2008, Cancer letters.

[24]  Michael T. Kleinman,et al.  Incidence and Apparent Health Significance of Brief Airborne Particle Excursions , 2000 .

[25]  Paul Schimek Reducing emissions from transit buses , 2001 .

[26]  Chang-Chuan Chan,et al.  Effects of Particle Size Fractions on Reducing Heart Rate Variability in Cardiac and Hypertensive Patients , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[27]  D. B. Hess,et al.  Determinants of exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) for waiting passengers at bus stops , 2010 .

[28]  B. Holmén,et al.  Ultrafine PM emissions from natural gas, oxidation-catalyst diesel, and particle-trap diesel heavy-duty transit buses. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Alan E Pisarski,et al.  New NCHRP-TCRP Report: Commuting in America III: The Third National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends , 2006 .

[30]  R. Burnett,et al.  Cardiovascular Mortality and Long-Term Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution: Epidemiological Evidence of General Pathophysiological Pathways of Disease , 2003, Circulation.

[31]  Paul R. Wyrwoll,et al.  national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) , 2012 .

[32]  Shengwei Zhu,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of micro-environmental conditions in public transportation buses , 2010, Building and Environment.