Assessing schematic knowledge of introductory probability theory

The ability to identify schematic knowledge is an important goal for both assessment and instruction. In the current paper, schematic knowledge of statistical probability theory is explored from the declarative-procedural framework using multiple methods of assessment. A sample of 90 undergraduate introductory statistics students was required to classify 10 pairs of probability problems as similar or different; to identify whether 15 problems contained sufficient, irrelevant, or missing information (text-edit); and to solve 10 additional problems. The complexity of the schema on which the problems were based was also manipulated. Detailed analyses compared text-editing and solution accuracy as a function of text-editing category and schema complexity. Results showed that text-editing tends to be easier than solution and differentially sensitive to schema complexity. While text-editing and classification were correlated with solution, only text-editing problems with missing information uniquely predicted success. In light of previous research these results suggest that text-editing is suitable for supplementing the assessment of schematic knowledge in development.

[1]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Expertise in Problem Solving. , 1981 .

[3]  David W. Carraher,et al.  Mathematics in the streets and in schools , 1985 .

[4]  H Eichenbaum,et al.  Memory for items and memory for relations in the procedural/declarative memory framework. , 1997, Memory.

[5]  Sean M. Hurley,et al.  Evidence for abstract, schematic knowledge of three spatial diagram representations , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[6]  L. Rips.  The Psychology of Proof: Deductive Reasoning in Human Thinking , 1994 .

[7]  John R. Anderson.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[8]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Analogical Processes in Learning , 1980 .

[9]  Sean P. Gyll,et al.  The role of attention processes in near transfer of cognitive skills , 2000 .

[10]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[11]  M. Gick.  Problem-solving strategies , 1986 .

[12]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. , 1999 .

[13]  R. Low,et al.  Gender Differences in Solution of Algebraic Word Problems Containing Irrelevant Information. , 1993 .

[14]  John R. Anderson.  Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[15]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[16]  J. Piaget.  The Psychology Of Intelligence , 1951 .

[17]  Renae Low,et al.  Hierarchical Ordering of Schematic Knowledge Relating to Area-of-Rectangle Problems. , 1992 .

[18]  M. Levine,et al.  Effects of Goal Specificity on Means-Ends Analysis and Learning. , 1982 .

[19]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human memory: An adaptive perspective. , 1989 .

[20]  Dan J. Woltz,et al.  An investigation of the role of working memory in procedural skill acquisition. , 1988 .

[21]  G. Halford.  Children's Understanding: The Development of Mental Models , 1993 .

[22]  John Sweller,et al.  Some cognitive processes and their consequences for the organisation and presentation of information , 1993 .

[23]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Memory for algebra story problems. , 1982 .

[24]  Martin D. S. Braine,et al.  The "natural logic" approach to reasoning. , 1990 .

[25]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Fred Paas,et al.  Process-Oriented Worked Examples: Improving Transfer Performance Through Enhanced Understanding , 2004 .

[27]  Renae Low,et al.  DETECTION OF MISSING AND IRRELEVANT INFORMATION WITHIN ALGEBRAIC STORY PROBLEMS , 1989 .

[28]  H. Simon,et al.  Learning Mathematics From Examples and by Doing , 1987 .

[29]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. , 1989 .

[30]  Jill L. Quilici,et al.  Teaching students to recognize structural similarities between statistics word problems , 2002 .

[31]  M. Ferguson-Hessler,et al.  Cognitive structures of good and poor novice problem solvers in physics , 1986 .

[32]  Clifford Konold,et al.  Issues in Assessing Conceptual Understanding in Probability and Statistics , 1995 .

[33]  Anthonius J.M. de Jong,et al.  Types and qualities of knowledge , 1993 .

[34]  L. Rips.  Cognitive Processes in Propositional Reasoning. , 1983 .

[35]  R. Byrne,et al.  Reasoning strategies for suppositional deductions , 1997, Cognition.

[36]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Schema induction in children's analogical problem solving. , 1999 .

[37]  Graeme S. Halford,et al.  Cognitive complexity of suppositional reasoning: An application of the relational complexity metric to the knight-knave task , 2002 .

[38]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Situational knowledge in physics: The case of electrodynamics , 2002 .

[39]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge Compilation: Mechanisms for the Automatization of Cognitive Skills. , 1980 .

[40]  D. Herrmann,et al.  Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. , 1982 .

[41]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Implications of the ACT-R Learning Theory: No Magic Bullets , 2000 .

[42]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Developing Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Skill in Mathematics: An Iterative Process. , 2001 .

[43]  J. Sweller,et al.  Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. , 1987 .

[44]  John Sweller,et al.  Text editing in chemistry instruction , 2002 .

[45]  John J. Rieser,et al.  Semantic Features of Similarity and Children's Strategies for Identifying Relevant Information in Mathematical Story Problems. , 1993 .

[46]  J. Sweller,et al.  Structuring Effective Worked Examples , 1990 .

[47]  G L Allen,et al.  Aging, cognitive resources, and declarative learning. , 1996, Psychology and aging.

[48]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[49]  L. Rips.  The psychology of knights and knaves , 1989, Cognition.

[50]  M. BENAROCH.  Declarative representation of strategic control knowledge , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[51]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning schemas , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  J. Sweller,et al.  Consequences of history-cued and means–end strategies in problem solving. , 1982 .

[53]  B Garfield Joan,et al.  Beyond Testing and Grading: Using Assessment To Improve Student Learning , 1994 .

[54]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. , 1990 .

[55]  Renae Low,et al.  Text editing of algebraic word problems , 1990 .

[56]  Jill L. Quilici,et al.  Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. , 1996 .

[57]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[58]  Renae Low,et al.  Solution of Algebraic Word Problems Following Training in Identifying Necessary and Sufficient Information within Problems , 1994 .