Particle deposition and optical response of ITER motional Stark effect diagnostic first mirrors

Particle deposition and erosion can affect mirrors used in plasma diagnostics and this is a major concern for future fusion reactors. This subject is analysed for the first and second mirrors of the proposed motional Stark effect edge plasma current diagnostic for ITER. Particle fluxes to the diagnostic module aperture are given by edge plasma/impurity-transport solutions for convective plasma flow for full-power fusion conditions. The MC-Mirror code with input of TRIM-SP results is used to compute in-module direct, reflected and sputtered particle transport. Particles analysed are D–T and He atoms/ions from the plasma, and Fe, Be and W from first wall sputtering and/or in-module sputtering. Many of the results are encouraging for optical diagnostic use in ITER and possibly for post-ITER high duty-factor reactors. The LLNL-4B module design analysed works well in minimizing particle flux to the mirrors, with a factor of ~200–400 reduction in aperture-to-first-mirror flux. Sputtering erosion/degradation of Mo or Rh coated mirrors by incident D, T and He is negligible. IMD optical effects code analysis shows probably tolerable changes in light reflection and polarization due to mirror beryllium deposition. Tungsten flux to the mirrors is very low. Based on available but limited data, however, there is major concern about the effect of the predicted helium flux on mirror optical properties.

[1]  D. Orlinski,et al.  First mirrors for diagnostic systems of an experimental fusion reactor I. Simulation mirror tests under neutron and ion bombardment , 2007 .

[2]  M. Almond,et al.  Computers in Physics , 1971 .

[3]  Wolfgang Eckstein,et al.  Computer simulation of ion-solid interactions , 1991 .

[4]  B. Schunke,et al.  First mirror contamination studies for polarimetry motional Stark effect measurements for ITER , 2004 .

[5]  V. S. Voitsenya,et al.  Diagnostic first mirrors for burning plasma experiments (invited) , 2001 .

[6]  K. Tokunaga,et al.  The effects of high fluence mixed-species (deuterium, helium, beryllium) plasma interactions with tungsten , 2009 .

[7]  Shuichi Takamura,et al.  Chapter 4: Power and particle control , 2007 .

[8]  C. Walker,et al.  Active beam spectroscopy diagnostics for ITER: Present status (invited) , 2004 .

[9]  K. Tokunaga,et al.  Microscopic damage of metals exposed to the helium discharges in TRIAM-1M tokamak and its impact on hydrogen recycling process , 2003 .

[10]  E. Palik Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids , 1997 .

[11]  Jean Paul Allain,et al.  Erosion/redeposition analysis of the ITER first wall with convective and non-convective plasma transport , 2006 .

[12]  J. Roth,et al.  Blister Formation of Tungsten due to Ion Bombardment , 2001 .

[13]  Y. Miwa,et al.  Microstructure dependence of deuterium retention and blistering in the near-surface region of tungsten exposed to high flux deuterium plasmas of 38 eV at 315 K , 2007 .

[14]  Gerald Pintsuk,et al.  First tests of diagnostic mirrors in a tokamak divertor : An overview of experiments in DIII-D , 2008 .

[15]  C. Linsmeier,et al.  Beryllium deposition on International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor first mirrors: Layer morphology and influence on mirror reflectivity , 2007 .

[16]  R. H. Bulmer,et al.  Scrape-off layer plasmas for ITER with 2nd X-point and convective transport effects , 2006 .

[17]  David L. Windt,et al.  IMD—software for modeling the optical properties of multilayer films , 1998 .

[18]  V. S. Voitsenya,et al.  First mirrors for diagnostic systems of ITER , 2007 .

[19]  K. Tokunaga,et al.  Impact of low energy helium irradiation on plasma facing metals , 2005 .

[20]  L. C. Woods Physics of plasmas , 2003 .

[21]  G. Tynan,et al.  Molybdenum angular sputtering distribution under low energy xenon ion bombardment , 2006 .

[22]  M. A. Makowski,et al.  Evaluation of ITER MSE Viewing Optics , 2007 .