A biomechanical analog of curve progression and orthotic stabilization in idiopathic scoliosis.

A biomechanical analog of curve progression and orthotic stabilization in idiopathic scoliosis has been developed using the classical theory of curved beam-columns. The interaction of the spinal musculature and other supporting structures is incorporated in the model using an equivalent flexural rigidity. The stability of a given scoliotic curve relative to a normal spine is described in terms of the so-called critical load ratio (Pc/Pe). This dimensionless quantity appears in the exact solution of the governing differential equation and boundary conditions. It is defined as the ratio of the load bearing capacity of a scoliotic spine (Pc) to that of a normal spine where the load bearing capacity of a normal spine is defined as Euler's buckling load (Pe). The computation of Pc/Pe is based upon a maximum allowable moment criterion. This model is used to study the effect of the degree of initial curvature and curve pattern in the frontal plane on the stability of untreated idiopathic scoliosis. Although restricted to two-dimensions, the model appears to demonstrate the synergistic effects of end support, transverse loading, and curve correction on improvement in relative stability of an orthotically supported scoliotic curve. The results of this study are in qualitative agreement with clinical findings that are based on long-term studies of natural history of idiopathic scoliosis and of patients undergoing orthotic management for scoliosis.

[1]  Hsue-shen Tsien,et al.  The Influence of Curvature on the Buckling Characteristics of Structures , 1940 .

[2]  H J Cramer,et al.  A distributed parameter model of the inertially loaded human spine. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  A B Schultz,et al.  Analog studies of forces in the human spine: computational techniques. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  L. Latta,et al.  Miami TLSO in the Management of Scoliosis: Preliminary Results in 100 Cases , 1981, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[5]  A. Schultz,et al.  Effectiveness of braces in mild idiopathic scoliosis. , 1984, Spine.

[6]  A B Schultz,et al.  Milwaukee brace correction of idiopathic scoliosis. A biomechanical analysis and a restrospective study. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  J. Pugh,et al.  Scoliosis and Growth , 1972 .

[8]  R Vanderby,et al.  A method for the identification of in-vivo segmental stiffness properties of the spine. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  T Belytschko,et al.  A model for studies of mechanical interactions between the human spine and rib cage. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  A Schultz,et al.  Forces acting in the Milwaukee brace on patients undergoing treatment for idiopathic scoliosis. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  R. Winter,et al.  Treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in the Milwaukee brace. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  Lucas Db Mechanics of the spine. , 1970 .

[13]  G. Macewen,et al.  The use of plastic jackets in the non-operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Preliminary report. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  I. Bjerkreim,et al.  Progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis after end of growth. , 1982, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[15]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  Progression of Unsupported Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1987, Spine.

[16]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  J. M. Carlson,et al.  The prediction of curve progression in untreated idiopathic scoliosis during growth. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  R. Dickson Scoliosis in the community. , 1983, British medical journal.