Structured light imaging for breast-conserving surgery, part II: texture analysis and classification

Abstract. Subdiffuse spatial frequency domain imaging (sd-SFDI) data of 42 freshly excised, bread-loafed tumor resections from breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were evaluated using texture analysis and a machine learning framework for tissue classification. Resections contained 56 regions of interest (RoIs) determined by expert histopathological analysis. RoIs were coregistered with sd-SFDI data and sampled into ∼4  ×  4  mm2 subimage samples of confirmed and homogeneous histological categories. Sd-SFDI reflectance textures were analyzed using gray-level co-occurrence matrix pixel statistics, image primitives, and power spectral density curve parameters. Texture metrics exhibited statistical significance (p-value  <  0.05) between three benign and three malignant tissue subtypes. Pairs of benign and malignant subtypes underwent texture-based, binary classification with correlation-based feature selection. Classification performance was evaluated using fivefold cross-validation and feature grid searching. Classification using subdiffuse, monochromatic reflectance (illumination spatial frequency of fx  =  1.37  mm  −  1, optical wavelength of λ  =  490  nm) achieved accuracies ranging from 0.55 (95% CI: 0.41 to 0.69) to 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90 to 1.00) depending on the benign–malignant diagnosis pair. Texture analysis of sd-SFDI data maintains the spatial context within images, is free of light transport model assumptions, and may provide an alternative, computationally efficient approach for wide field-of-view (cm2) BCS tumor margin assessment relative to pixel-based optical scatter or color properties alone.

[1]  Elizabeth J. Rizzo,et al.  Calibration and analysis of a multimodal micro-CT and structured light imaging system for the evaluation of excised breast tissue , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Ara Darzi,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraoperative Techniques for Margin Assessment in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Meta-analysis , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[3]  Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy,et al.  Sub-diffusive scattering parameter maps recovered using wide-field high-frequency structured light imaging. , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[4]  J. Bennett,et al.  Calculation of the power spectral density from surface profile data. , 1995, Applied optics.

[5]  Milind Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Quantitative molecular phenotyping with topically applied SERS nanoparticles for intraoperative guidance of breast cancer lumpectomy , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  B. E. F. Isher,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2002 .

[7]  Zvi Kaufman,et al.  Mapping breast tissue types by miniature radio-frequency near-field spectroscopy sensor in ex-vivo freshly excised specimens , 2016, BMC Medical Imaging.

[8]  Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy,et al.  Structured light scatteroscopy , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[9]  Agma J. M. Traina,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Fractal Analysis of Textures , 2012, 2012 25th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images.

[10]  Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy,et al.  Scatter Spectroscopic Imaging Distinguishes between Breast Pathologies in Tissues Relevant to Surgical Margin Assessment , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  Alwin Kienle,et al.  Quantifying phase function influence in subdiffusively backscattered light , 2016, Journal of biomedical optics.

[12]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  Nimmi Ramanujam,et al.  Optical breast cancer margin assessment: an observational study of the effects of tissue heterogeneity on optical contrast , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[14]  Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy,et al.  Spectral discrimination of breast pathologies in situ using spatial frequency domain imaging , 2013, Breast Cancer Research.

[15]  Brian W Pogue,et al.  Light scattering measured with spatial frequency domain imaging can predict stromal versus epithelial proportions in surgically resected breast tissue , 2018, Journal of biomedical optics.

[16]  Lloyd A. Smith,et al.  Feature Selection for Machine Learning: Comparing a Correlation-Based Filter Approach to the Wrapper , 1999, FLAIRS.

[17]  Brian W Pogue,et al.  Structured light imaging for breast-conserving surgery, part I: optical scatter and color analysis , 2019, Journal of biomedical optics.

[18]  S. Jacques Optical properties of biological tissues: a review , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Mark C Kelley,et al.  Accuracy of Intraoperative Gross Examination of Surgical Margin Status in Women Undergoing Partial Mastectomy for Breast Malignancy , 2005, The American surgeon.

[20]  F. Cendes,et al.  Texture analysis of medical images. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[21]  Forough Farrokhyar,et al.  Technical factors, surgeon case volume and positive margin rates after breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer. , 2010, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[22]  Brian W Pogue,et al.  Review of methods for intraoperative margin detection for breast conserving surgery , 2018, Journal of biomedical optics.

[23]  D. Dabbs,et al.  Fibrocystic Change and Usual Epithelial Hyperplasia of Ductal Type , 2012 .

[24]  安藤 寛,et al.  Cross-Validation , 1952, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[25]  Anthony J. Durkin,et al.  Modulated imaging: quantitative analysis and tomography of turbid media in the spatial-frequency domain. , 2005, Optics letters.

[26]  F. Pansera Fractals and cancer. , 1994, Medical hypotheses.

[27]  Richard C. Gilmore,et al.  Surgeon Re-Excision Rates after Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Measure of Low-Value Care. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[28]  Xavier Intes,et al.  Review of structured light in diffuse optical imaging , 2018, Journal of biomedical optics.

[29]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[30]  F. Farrokhyar,et al.  The relationship between surgical factors and margin status after breast-conservation surgery for early stage breast cancer. , 2009, American journal of surgery.

[31]  Thomas Frazier,et al.  A Randomized Prospective Study of Lumpectomy Margin Assessment with Use of MarginProbe in Patients with Nonpalpable Breast Malignancies , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[32]  A. O'Doherty,et al.  Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery. , 2004, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[33]  Anthony J. Durkin,et al.  Quantitation and mapping of tissue optical properties using modulated imaging. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[34]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[35]  Brian W Pogue,et al.  Wide-field quantitative imaging of tissue microstructure using sub-diffuse spatial frequency domain imaging. , 2016, Optica.

[36]  Anthony J. Durkin,et al.  Burn wound classification model using spatial frequency-domain imaging and machine learning , 2019, Journal of biomedical optics.

[37]  Jack A Tuszynski,et al.  Automatic prediction of tumour malignancy in breast cancer with fractal dimension , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[38]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Optical scattering properties of soft tissue: a discrete particle model. , 1998, Applied optics.

[39]  Bianca De Stavola,et al.  Mammographic Features and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluations in the Guernsey Prospective Studies , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[40]  Jeffrey L Myers,et al.  Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center. , 2012, American journal of clinical pathology.