Modal parameter identification of RC frame under undamaged, damaged, repaired and strengthened conditions

Abstract Structures are built on a design and then damaged in time by natural and manmade effects, repaired and strengthened for reusing. Determination of the structural behavior is very important to avoid future disaster. Operational Modal Analysis has been widely used recently to determine the inherent modal parameters of engineering structures and give significant information about the structural condition. Also, this method can be used to further studies such as model updating, damage detection and health monitoring. In this paper, it is aimed to investigate the changes of modal parameters considering undamaged, damaged, repaired and strengthened conditions using ambient vibration tests. For this purpose, a reinforced concrete frame model having two-floor with two spans in the longitudinal direction considering ½ geometric scales is built in laboratory. Four different cases are considered to emerge the efficiency of this procedure and the undamaged RC model is measured firstly to determine the initial modal parameters. Secondly, the lateral forces are applied to floor levels to obtain the damages, especially in beam-column joints. Thirdly, the damaged model is repaired using injection material and lastly strengthened with Carbon Fiber Reinforcement Polymer. It is also examined that what rate the dynamic characteristics return to back after repairing and strengthening studies by the comparison with undamaged condition? In addition to this the evaluation of carbon fiber reinforcement polymer effectiveness in strengthening for real applications is presented. It is seen that ambient vibration test is enough to identify the modal parameters of engineering structures for different conditions. The modal parameters are decreased distinctly with damages, and reverted almost initial condition with strengthening.

[1]  Zeki Karaca,et al.  Dynamic responses of industrial reinforced concrete chimneys strengthened with fiber‐reinforced polymers , 2015 .

[2]  Iman Hajirasouliha,et al.  Seismic behaviour of deficient RC frames strengthened with CFRP composites , 2010 .

[3]  A. Nanni,et al.  IMPROVING SHEAR CAPACITY OF EXISTING RC T-SECTION BEAMS USING CFRP COMPOSITES , 2000 .

[4]  Kypros Pilakoutas,et al.  A practical method for determining shear crack induced deformation in FRP RC beams , 2016 .

[5]  Tao Yu,et al.  Compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete-encased steel columns , 2016 .

[6]  Tao Yu,et al.  FRP-confined circular concrete-filled thin steel tubes under axial compression , 2011 .

[7]  Tao Yu,et al.  Cyclic lateral response of FRP-confined circular concrete-filled steel tubular columns , 2016 .

[8]  Maurizio Papia,et al.  Flexural behaviour of glulam timber beams reinforced with FRP cords , 2015 .

[9]  Marinella Fossetti,et al.  Comparative experimental analysis on the compressive behaviour of masonry columns strengthened by FRP, BFRCM or steel wires , 2017 .

[10]  Costas P. Antonopoulos,et al.  Analysis of FRP-Strengthened RC Beam-Column Joints , 2002 .

[11]  Alireza Maheri,et al.  Seismic performance of ordinary RC frames retrofitted at joints by FRP sheets , 2010 .

[12]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Seismic Behavior of a Full-Scale RC Structure Retrofitted Using GFRP Laminates , 2008 .

[13]  Ciro Del Vecchio,et al.  Modelling beam-column joints and FRP strengthening in the seismic performance assessment of RC existing frames , 2016 .

[14]  Alemdar Bayraktar,et al.  Dynamic Characteristics of an Arch Dam Model before and after Strengthening with Consideration of Reservoir Water , 2016 .

[15]  Alemdar Bayraktar,et al.  Retrofitting Effect on the Dynamic Properties of Model-Arch Dam with and without Reservoir Water Using Ambient-Vibration Test Methods , 2016 .

[16]  Ricardo Carrazedo,et al.  Assessment of shear damaged and NSM CFRP retrofitted reinforced concrete beams based on modal analysis , 2016 .

[17]  O. Buyukozturk,et al.  FAILURE BEHAVIOR OF PRECRACKED CONCRETE BEAMS RETROFITTED WITH FRP , 1998 .

[18]  Bassem O Andrawes,et al.  Compression behavior of FRP strengthened bridge timber piles subjected to accelerated aging , 2016 .

[19]  Thomas Tannert,et al.  Experimental investigations on timber joints with single glued-in FRP rods , 2017 .

[20]  L. Bank Composites for Construction: Structural Design with FRP Materials , 2006 .

[21]  Abdeldjelil Belarbi,et al.  Cracking behavior and crack width predictions of FRP strengthened RC members under tension , 2016 .

[22]  Robert Kliger,et al.  FRP reinforcement of timber structures , 2015 .

[23]  U. Meier STRENGTHENING OF STRUCTURES USING CARBON FIBRE/EPOXY COMPOSITES , 1995 .

[24]  Alemdar Bayraktar,et al.  CFRP composite retrofitting effect on the dynamic characteristics of arch dams , 2015 .

[25]  D. Bolognini,et al.  Performance-Based Seismic Retrofit Strategy for Existing Reinforced Concrete Frame Systems Using Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites , 2007 .

[26]  Paolo Foraboschi,et al.  Effectiveness of novel methods to increase the FRP-masonry bond capacity , 2016 .

[27]  Tomáš Čejka,et al.  Failure mechanism of compressed short brick masonry columns confined with FRP strips , 2014 .

[28]  Scott T Smith,et al.  Full-range load-deflection response of FRP-strengthened RC flexural members anchored with FRP anchors , 2017 .

[29]  Tao Yu,et al.  FRP-confined circular concrete-filled steel tubular columns under cyclic axial compression , 2014 .

[30]  Emmanuel Ferrier,et al.  Shear behaviour of masonry walls strengthened by external bonded FRP and TRC , 2015 .

[31]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Seismic behavior of a full-scale RC frame repaired using CFRP laminates , 2005 .