Safety and efficacy of baricitinib at 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate

Objectives To investigate baricitinib (LY3009104, formerly INCB028050), a novel, oral inhibitor of JAK1/JAK2 in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with methotrexate. Methods In this phase IIb study, 301 patients were randomised 2:1:1:1:1 to receive once daily doses of placebo or 1, 2, 4 or 8 mg baricitinib for 12 weeks. Patients assigned to 2, 4 and 8 mg baricitinib continued blinded treatment for an additional 12 weeks. Patients assigned to placebo or 1 mg baricitinib were reassigned to 2 mg twice daily or 4 mg once daily baricitinib between weeks 12–24. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in the combined 4 and 8 mg groups achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response versus placebo at week 12. Results Significantly more patients in the combined baricitinib 4 and 8 mg groups compared with placebo achieved an ACR20 response at week 12 (76% vs 41%, p<0.001). At week 12, significant differences versus placebo were also observed in patients achieving ACR50, ACR70 and remission as measured by Disease Activity Score for 28-joint counts, Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simplified Disease Activity Index. Patients receiving 2, 4, or 8 mg baricitinib maintained or improved in all measures through 24 weeks. Similar proportions of patients experienced at least one adverse event in the placebo and baricitinib groups. Serious infections developed in three patients receiving baricitinib. No cases of tuberculosis, herpes zoster, opportunistic infections or deaths were reported. Dose-dependent decreases in haemoglobin were observed with baricitinib. Conclusions Baricitinib improved the signs and symptoms of RA in methotrexate inadequate responders with active disease. Baricitinib was well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings through week 24. Trial registration number NCT01185353.

[1]  J. O’Shea,et al.  Janus kinase inhibitors in autoimmune diseases , 2013, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  Tamas Koncz,et al.  Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[3]  Steven M Holland,et al.  JAKs and STATs in immunity, immunodeficiency, and cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  E. Lee,et al.  Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. Kremer,et al.  Placebo-controlled trial of tofacitinib monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Fridman,et al.  Selective Inhibition of JAK1 and JAK2 Is Efficacious in Rodent Models of Arthritis: Preclinical Characterization of INCB028050 , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[7]  P. V. van Riel,et al.  The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR response criteria. , 2005, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[8]  Tanja Stamm,et al.  Remission and active disease in rheumatoid arthritis: defining criteria for disease activity states. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  J. Smolen,et al.  The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2005, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[10]  J. Ware,et al.  Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  P. van Riel,et al.  Validation of rheumatoid arthritis improvement criteria that include simplified joint counts. , 1998, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  J J Anderson,et al.  American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  P. Tugwell,et al.  Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the patient's perspective. , 1993, The Journal of rheumatology.

[14]  F. Arnett Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[15]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  J. Fridman,et al.  Selective Inhibition of JAK 1 and JAK 2 Is Efficacious in Rodent Models of Arthritis : Preclinical Characterization of INCB 028050 , 2010 .

[17]  W. Leonard,et al.  Jaks and STATs: biological implications. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.

[18]  F. Breedveld,et al.  Validity and reliability of the twenty-eight-joint count for the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis activity. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.