Stable individual differences in number discrimination in infancy.

Previous studies have shown that as a group 6-month-old infants successfully discriminate numerical changes when the values differ by at least a 1:2 ratio but fail at a 2:3 ratio (e.g. 8 vs. 16 but not 8 vs. 12). However, no studies have yet examined individual differences in number discrimination in infancy. Using a novel numerical change detection paradigm, we present more direct evidence that infants' numerical perception is ratio-dependent even within the range of discriminable ratios and thus adheres to Weber's Law. Furthermore, we show that infants' numerical discrimination at 6 months reliably predicts their numerical discrimination abilities but not visual short-term memory at 9 months. Thus, individual differences in numerical discrimination acuity may be stable within the first year of life and provide important avenues for future longitudinal research exploring the relationship between infant numerical discrimination and later developing math achievement.

[1]  S. Carey.  The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[2]  M. Noël,et al.  Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing , 2007, Cognition.

[3]  Fei Xu,et al.  Number sense in human infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[4]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Number bias for the discrimination of large visual sets in infancy , 2004, Cognition.

[5]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[6]  M. L. Howe,et al.  Long-term retention in 3.5-month-olds: familiarization time and individual differences in attentional style. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Infant habituation: assessments of individual differences and short-term reliability at five months. , 1986, Child development.

[8]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Discrimination of Large and Small Numerosities by Human Infants , 2004 .

[9]  R. Aslin.  What's in a look? , 2007, Developmental science.

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-old children and adults. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[12]  M. Arterberry,et al.  Variability and its sources in infant categorization , 2002 .

[13]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. , 1998 .

[14]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[15]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Development of Elementary Numerical Abilities: A Neuronal Model , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Feldman,et al.  Infant Visual Attention: Stability of Individual Differences From 6 to 8 Months. , 1987 .

[17]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8–9-year-old students , 2004, Cognition.

[18]  Gavin R. Price,et al.  Impaired parietal magnitude processing in developmental dyscalculia , 2007, Current Biology.

[19]  S. Luck,et al.  The development of visual short-term memory capacity in infants. , 2003, Child development.

[20]  E. Cannon,et al.  Preschoolers' Magnitude Comparisons are Mediated by a Preverbal Analog Mechanism , 2000, Psychological science.

[21]  J. Cantlon,et al.  Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans , 2006, Psychological science.

[22]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Induced Alpha-band Oscillations Reflect Ratio-dependent Number Discrimination in the Infant Brain , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.