The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study

The question regarding whether somatosensory inputs are processed in parallel or in series has not been clearly answered. Several studies that have applied dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to fMRI data have arrived at seemingly divergent conclusions. However, these divergent results could be explained by the hypothesis that the processing route of somatosensory information changes with time. Specifically, we suggest that somatosensory stimuli are processed in parallel only during the early stage, whereas the processing is later dominated by serial processing. This hypothesis was revisited in the present study based on fMRI analyses of tactile stimuli and the application of DCM to magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data collected during sustained (260 ms) tactile stimulation. Bayesian model comparisons were used to infer the processing stream. We demonstrated that the favored processing stream changes over time. We found that the neural activity elicited in the first 100 ms following somatosensory stimuli is best explained by models that support a parallel processing route, whereas a serial processing route is subsequently favored. These results suggest that the secondary somatosensory area (SII) receives information regarding a new stimulus in parallel with the primary somatosensory area (SI), whereas later processing in the SII is dominated by the preprocessed input from the SI.

[1]  Carsten Klingner,et al.  Dependence of the negative BOLD response on somatosensory stimulus intensity , 2010, NeuroImage.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Evoked brain responses are generated by feedback loops , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The neural substrate for working memory of tactile surface texture , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Katsuya Ogata,et al.  Oscillatory gamma synchronization binds the primary and secondary somatosensory areas in humans , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  F. Blankenburg,et al.  Recurrent Neural Processing and Somatosensory Awareness , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  M. Bozkurt,et al.  Functional anatomy. , 1980, Equine veterinary journal.

[8]  K Sathian,et al.  Analysis of haptic information in the cerebral cortex. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Christian Wallraven,et al.  Intra- and inter-hemispheric effective connectivity in the human somatosensory cortex during pressure stimulation , 2014, BMC Neuroscience.

[10]  T. Powell,et al.  Connexions of the somatic sensory cortex of the rhesus monkey. II. Contralateral cortical connexions. , 1969, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Serial processing in the human somatosensory system. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  D Mumford,et al.  On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. , 1992, Biological cybernetics.

[14]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian model selection for group studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[16]  E. Jones.  Pattern of Cortical and Thalamic Connexions of the Somatic Sensory Cortex , 1967, Nature.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The functional anatomy of attention: a DCM study , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[18]  L. Squire,et al.  The medial temporal lobe memory system , 1991, Science.

[19]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Transient Storage of a Tactile Memory Trace in Primary Somatosensory Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  John C Gore,et al.  Dependence of BOLD signal change on tactile stimulus intensity in SI of primates. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[21]  A. Mouraux,et al.  Parallel Processing of Nociceptive and Non-nociceptive Somatosensory Information in the Human Primary and Secondary Somatosensory Cortices: Evidence from Dynamic Causal Modeling of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[23]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  The Topography of Tactile Working Memory , 2001, Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Mumford.  On the computational architecture of the neocortex , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  T. Pasternak,et al.  Working memory in primate sensory systems , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[27]  A. Borst.  Seeing smells: imaging olfactory learning in bees , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  J. Karhu,et al.  Simultaneous early processing of sensory input in human primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling suggests serial processing of tactile vibratory stimuli in the human somatosensory cortex—An fMRI study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[30]  Luis Concha,et al.  The parietal cortices participate in encoding, short-term memory, and decision-making related to tactile shape. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[32]  J. Fuster,et al.  Mnemonic neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Michael J. Quinn,et al.  Parallel Processing , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[34]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[36]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of precision and synaptic gain in visual perception — an EEG study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[37]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[38]  Carsten Klingner,et al.  Parallel processing of somatosensory information: Evidence from dynamic causal modeling of MEG data , 2015, NeuroImage.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[40]  Sergio Tufik,et al.  Afferent pain pathways: a neuroanatomical review , 2004, Brain Research.

[41]  R. Romo,et al.  Neuronal correlates of parametric working memory in the prefrontal cortex , 1999, Nature.

[42]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Neurophysiology and Functional Neuroanatomy of Pain Perception , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[43]  G. Curio,et al.  The effect of artifact rejection by signal-space projection on source localization accuracy in MEG measurements , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  A. Turman,et al.  PARALLEL ORGANIZATION OF SOMATOSENSORY CORTICAL AREAS I AND II FOR TACTILE PROCESSING , 1996, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling for evoked responses , 2009 .

[46]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[47]  Yong-Di Zhou,et al.  Distributed neural networks of tactile working memory , 2013, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[48]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[49]  Pierre Rainville,et al.  Serial processing in primary and secondary somatosensory cortex: A DCM analysis of human fMRI data in response to innocuous and noxious electrical stimulation , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.