Sensitivity of the hand to surface pressure.

A new method of measuring pain-pressure threshold (PPT) of the hand has been developed. Externally applied surface pressure (EASP) was exerted at a certain rate of increase and the level where the feeling of pressure turned into pain was recorded. Also, the effects of sustained EASP were elucidated. Sixteen healthy right-handed subjects (eight female, eight male) participated. The distribution of the hand's sensitivity to EASP is presented. The most sensitive areas were the thenar area, the skinfold between thumb and index finger and the area around os pisiforme. When the hand was repeatedly exposed to EASP, the PPT decreased with increasing number of pressure incidents. For sustained EASP, the time of exposure was found to be important also for the quality of the sensation. Our results show that sustained EASP does not hurt at once, but becomes painful after a short time. On average, the female PPT corresponded to two-thirds of the male PPT. Females experienced pain faster than males when exposed to sustained EASP, and chose lower levels when estimating acceptable sustained EASP.

[1]  T. Husain,et al.  An experimental study of some pressure effects on tissues, with reference to the bed-sore problem. , 1953, The Journal of pathology and bacteriology.

[2]  T. M. Fraser,et al.  Ergonomic principles in the design of hand tools , 1980 .

[3]  E R Tichauer,et al.  Ergonomic principles basic to hand tool design. , 1977, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[4]  Ulf Lindblom,et al.  Pressure-pain threshold in human temporal region. Evaluation of a new pressure algometer , 1986, Pain.

[5]  L Bennett.  Transferring load to flesh. Part VIII. Stasis and stress. , 1975, Bulletin of prosthetics research.

[6]  T. List,et al.  Reliability and validity of a pressure threshold meter in recording tenderness in the masseter muscle and the anterior temporalis muscle. , 1989, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[7]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  D. Haslam.  Lateral Dominance in the Perception of Size and of Pain , 1970, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[9]  H. Merskey,et al.  The Reliability of the Pressure Algometer , 1964 .

[10]  H. Merskey,et al.  A clinical investigation of reactions to pain. , 1962, The Journal of mental science.

[11]  J C Davenport,et al.  Pressure-pain thresholds in the oral cavity in man. , 1969, Archives of oral biology.

[12]  R. Atkins,et al.  An algometer for the automated measurement of pain threshold. , 1990, British journal of rheumatology.

[13]  T. Jensen,et al.  Measurements of human pressure-pain thresholds on fingers and toes , 1989, Pain.

[14]  B Fagrell,et al.  Local skin pressure and its effects on skin microcirculation as evaluated by laser-Doppler fluxmetry. , 1989, Clinical physiology.

[15]  D. Mccarty,et al.  A DOLORIMETER FOR QUANTIFICATION OF ARTICULAR TENDERNESS. , 1965, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  H. Wolff,et al.  Pain Sensations and Reactions , 1953, Neurology.

[17]  A. Fischer.  Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold , 1987, Pain.

[18]  R. Johansson,et al.  Sensitivity to edges of mechanoreceptive afferent units innervating the glabrous skin of the human hand , 1982, Brain Research.

[19]  J ROUBAL,et al.  Tool handles and control levers of machines. , 1962, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[20]  H. Wolff,et al.  Studies on pain: measurements of aching pain threshold and discrimination of differences in intensity of aching pain. , 1952, Journal of applied physiology.

[21]  W. Kubicek,et al.  Evaluation of pressure as a factor in the production of ischial ulcers. , 1958, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  D. Haslam.  Heat pain and pressure pain , 1967 .