Classical Thermodynamics Revisited: A Systems and Control Perspective.

The purpose of this paper is two-fold. First, to make clear (and de-mystify) the basic concepts of classical thermodynamics, and thus to enable the integration of thermodynamics within systems modeling and control. Second, to demonstrate that systems and control theory provides a natural context for the formulation and understanding of classical thermodynamics. This is not so surprising since classical thermodynamics, firmly rooted in engineering with questions such as the maximal efficiency of steam engines, deals from the very start with systems in interaction with their surrounding (by heat flow, mechanical work, flow of matter, etc.). In particular, it will be shown that dissipativity theory is key in the formulation and interpretation of the First and Second Law of thermodynamics. Also a geometric view on the state properties and the dynamics of thermodynamic systems will be emphasized, thereby unifying and simplifying different representations of thermodynamic systems. On the other hand, I will also argue that thermodynamics motivates paradigm shifts within systems and control; in particular, the use of non-minimal state space formulations, and a geometric view on them. Furthermore, while systems and control theory has been primarily based on linear systems with quadratic cost criteria, in line with basic system models in electrical and mechanical engineering (RLC-circuits, mass-spring-damper systems, etc.), thermodynamics necessitates to go beyond this linear-quadratic paradigm.

[1]  R. MrugaŁa,et al.  Geometrical formulation of equilibrium phenomenological thermodynamics , 1978 .

[2]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Port-Hamiltonian Systems Theory: An Introductory Overview , 2014, Found. Trends Syst. Control..

[3]  J.M.A. Scherpen,et al.  Multidomain modeling of nonlinear networks and systems , 2009, IEEE Control Systems.

[4]  M. Feinberg The existence and uniqueness of steady states for a class of chemical reaction networks , 1995 .

[5]  Charles-Michel Marle,et al.  Symplectic geometry and analytical mechanics , 1987 .

[6]  A. J. van der Schaft,et al.  Port-Hamiltonian modeling of non-isothermal chemical reaction networks , 2018, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry.

[7]  A. Schaft,et al.  Port-controlled Hamiltonian systems : modelling origins and systemtheoretic properties , 1992 .

[8]  Alan J. Davies A course in mathematics for students of physics 2 , by Paul Bamberg and Shlomo Sterberg. Pp 443. £60 (hardback). 1990. ISBN 0-521-33245-1 (Cambridge University Press) , 1991 .

[9]  P. Moylan,et al.  Dissipative Dynamical Systems: Basic Input-Output and State Properties , 1980 .

[10]  L. Loeb Autobiographical Notes , 2015, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[11]  R. Jackson,et al.  General mass action kinetics , 1972 .

[12]  P. S. Bauer Dissipative Dynamical Systems: I. , 1931, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Witold Respondek,et al.  A contact covariant approach to optimal control with applications to sub-Riemannian geometry , 2015, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[14]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Cyclo-Dissipativity Revisited , 2020, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[15]  R. Balian,et al.  Hamiltonian structure of thermodynamics with gauge , 2000 .

[16]  V. Arnold Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics , 1974 .

[17]  Tomoki Ohsawa Contact geometry of the Pontryagin maximum principle , 2015, Autom..

[18]  A. Bravetti Contact geometry and thermodynamics , 2019, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics.

[19]  A. Schaft,et al.  The Hamiltonian formulation of energy conserving physical systems with external ports , 1995 .

[20]  Diana Bohm,et al.  L2 Gain And Passivity Techniques In Nonlinear Control , 2016 .

[21]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  On the Mathematical Structure of Balanced Chemical Reaction Networks Governed by Mass Action Kinetics , 2011, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[22]  Singiresu S Rao,et al.  A Comparative Study of Evidence Theories in the Modeling, Analysis, and Design of Engineering Systems , 2013 .

[23]  D. Whiffen Thermodynamics , 1973, Nature.

[24]  J. Willems Dissipative dynamical systems part I: General theory , 1972 .

[25]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Hamiltonian formulation of bond graphs , 2003 .

[26]  Jan C. Willems,et al.  Qualitative Behavior of Interconnected Systems , 1974 .

[27]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  About Some System-Theoretic Properties of Port-Thermodynamic Systems , 2019, GSI.

[28]  A. Chattopadhyay,et al.  Heat and thermodynamics , 1952 .

[29]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Geometry of Thermodynamic Processes , 2018, Entropy.

[30]  Ti-Wei Xue,et al.  What Is the Real Clausius Statement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics? , 2019, Entropy.

[31]  Miroslav Grmela,et al.  Contact Geometry of Mesoscopic Thermodynamics and Dynamics , 2014, Entropy.

[32]  N. Lord Contact Geometry And Wave Propagation , 1990, The Mathematical Gazette.

[33]  Maureen T. Carroll Geometry , 2017 .

[34]  J. Knuiman,et al.  On the Relation between the Fundamental Equation of Thermodynamics and the Energy Balance Equation in the Context of Closed and Open Systems , 2012 .

[35]  F. Horn Necessary and sufficient conditions for complex balancing in chemical kinetics , 1972 .

[36]  Shu-Kun Lin,et al.  Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures , 1999, Entropy.

[37]  F. Hartmann Heat and Thermodynamics , 2009 .

[38]  Wassim M. Haddad,et al.  A Dynamical Systems Theory of Thermodynamics , 2019 .

[39]  Dimitri Jeltsema,et al.  Limits to Energy Conversion , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.