How similar can co-occurring species be in the presence of competition and ecological drift?

If two species live on a single resource, the one with a slight advantage will out-compete the other: complete competitors cannot coexist. This is known as the competitive exclusion principle. If no extinction occurs, it is because evolutionary adaptation to slightly different niches takes place. Therefore, it is widely accepted that ecological communities are assembled by evolutionary differentiation and progressive adaptation of species to different niches. However, some ecologists have recently challenged this classic paradigm highlighting the importance of chance and stochasticity. Using a synthetic framework for community dynamics, here we show that, while deterministic descriptors predict coexistence, species similarity is limited in a more restrictive way in the presence of stochasticity. We analyse the stochastic extinction phenomenon, showing that extinction occurs as competitive overlap increases above a certain threshold well below its deterministic counterpart. We also prove that the extinction threshold cannot be ascribed only to demographic fluctuations around small population sizes. The more restrictive limit to species similarity is, therefore, a consequence of the complex interplay between competitive interactions and ecological drift. As a practical implication, we show that the existence of a stochastic limit to similarity has important consequences in the recovery of fragmented habitats.

[1]  J. Capitán,et al.  Catastrophic regime shifts in model ecological communities are true phase transitions , 2010, 1008.0335.

[2]  C. Klausmeier,et al.  Functional traits explain phytoplankton community structure and seasonal dynamics in a marine ecosystem. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[3]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[4]  Robert M. May,et al.  Size and complexity in model financial systems , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[6]  B Grenfell,et al.  Space, persistence and dynamics of measles epidemics. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  The implicit assumption of symmetry and the species abundance distribution. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[8]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[9]  THE PARADOX,et al.  The paradox , 1982, Medical History.

[10]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  A competitive network theory of species diversity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  G. Hardin The competitive exclusion principle. , 1960, Science.

[12]  Elena Litchman,et al.  Trait-Based Community Ecology of Phytoplankton , 2008 .

[13]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  The merits of neutral theory. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[15]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[16]  R. May,et al.  Systemic risk: the dynamics of model banking systems , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  José A Capitán,et al.  Statistical mechanics of ecosystem assembly. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[18]  Zhen Jin,et al.  A Simple Stochastic Model with Environmental Transmission Explains Multi-Year Periodicity in Outbreaks of Avian Flu , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  A. McKane,et al.  Stochastic formulation of ecological models and their applications. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity , 2009, Nature.

[21]  David Tilman,et al.  Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  José A Capitán,et al.  Species assembly in model ecosystems, II: Results of the assembly process. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  R. Macarthur,et al.  COMPETITION, HABITAT SELECTION, AND CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Stephen P Hubbell,et al.  Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalence. , 2006, Ecology.

[25]  P. Chesson General theory of competitive coexistence in spatially-varying environments. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[26]  José A Capitán,et al.  Species assembly in model ecosystems, I: Analysis of the population model and the invasion dynamics. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  J. Huisman,et al.  Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos , 1999, Nature.

[28]  Leora F. Klapper,et al.  Bank Competition and Financial Stability , 2008 .

[29]  M. Pascual,et al.  Stochastic amplification in epidemics , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[30]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  A dispersal-limited sampling theory for species and alleles. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[31]  Peter A. Abrams,et al.  The theory of limiting similarity , 1983 .

[32]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Multiple Scales and the Maintenance of Biodiversity , 2000, Ecosystems.

[33]  George Sugihara,et al.  Complex systems: Ecology for bankers , 2008, Nature.

[34]  Peter B Adler,et al.  A niche for neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[35]  R M May,et al.  On the theory of niche overlap. , 1974, Theoretical population biology.

[36]  Michel Loreau,et al.  A mathematical synthesis of niche and neutral theories in community ecology. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  R. May,et al.  Systemic risk in banking ecosystems , 2011, Nature.

[38]  G. F. Gause The struggle for existence , 1971 .

[39]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[40]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[41]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Relaxing the zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  Mark Vellend,et al.  Conceptual Synthesis in Community Ecology , 2010, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[43]  Rampal S. Etienne,et al.  Neutral Community Theory: How Stochasticity and Dispersal-Limitation Can Explain Species Coexistence , 2007 .

[44]  G. Gauze The struggle for existence, by G. F. Gause. , 1934 .