Studies of Visual Attention in Physics Problem Solving.

[1]  B. Meyer.  The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[2]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[3]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[6]  L. Itti,et al.  Visual causes versus correlates of attentional selection in dynamic scenes , 2006, Vision Research.

[7]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  The Effects of Signals on Learning from Text and Diagrams: How Looking at Diagrams Earlier and More Frequently Improves Understanding , 2010, Diagrams.

[8]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Richard K. Lowe.  Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[10]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[11]  S. Ohlsson.  Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena , 1992 .

[12]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy , 2002 .

[13]  B. Velichkovsky.  Communicating attention: Gaze position transfer in cooperative problem solving , 1995 .

[14]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. , 1996 .

[15]  David E. Irwin Robert D. Gordon.  Eye Movements, Attention and Trans-saccadic Memory , 1998 .

[16]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  Stephan Schwan,et al.  Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system , 2008 .

[18]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .

[19]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  ScanMatch: A novel method for comparing fixation sequences , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[20]  F. Paas,et al.  Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? , 2010 .

[21]  R. F. Lorch,et al.  Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text , 1996 .

[22]  Chandralekha Singh,et al.  Assessing Expertise in Introductory Physics Using Categorization Task , 2016 .

[23]  Hans-Werner Gellersen,et al.  Toward Mobile Eye-Based Human-Computer Interaction , 2010, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[24]  Thomas Huk,et al.  Learning cell biology with close-up views or connecting lines: Evidence for the structure mapping effect , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  Jose P. Mestre,et al.  Eye-Gaze Patterns as Students Study Worked-out Examples in Mechanics. , 2010 .

[26]  H. Tabbers,et al.  Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[27]  R. B. Johnson,et al.  Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches , 2007 .

[28]  Richard K. Lowe.  Search Strategies and Inference in the Exploration of Scientific Diagrams , 1989 .

[29]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics , 1994 .

[30]  Derrick J. Parkhurst,et al.  Scene content selected by active vision. , 2003, Spatial vision.

[31]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[32]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Covert Visual Spatial Orienting and Saccades: Overlapping Neural Systems , 2000, NeuroImage.

[33]  David E. Brown.  Students' concept of force: the importance of understanding Newton's third law , 1989 .

[34]  Nancy Lockitch Loman,et al.  SIGNALING TECHNIQUES THAT INCREASE THE UNDERSTANDABILITY OF EXPOSITORY PROSE , 1983 .

[35]  Eric Jamet,et al.  Attention guiding in multimedia learning , 2008 .

[36]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[37]  D. Robinson,et al.  Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements , 1996, Nature.

[38]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[39]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[40]  Erol Özçelik,et al.  Why does signaling enhance multimedia learning? Evidence from eye movements , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Alain Breuleux,et al.  Effect of animation in enhancing descriptive and procedural texts in a multimedia learning environment , 1996 .

[43]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  An Eye Tracking Comparison of External Pointing Cues and Internal Continuous Cues in Learning with Complex Animations , 2010 .

[44]  F. Paas,et al.  Attention Cueing as a Means to Enhance Learning from an Animation , 2007 .

[45]  Christof Koch,et al.  Modeling attention to salient proto-objects , 2006, Neural Networks.

[46]  Ference Marton,et al.  Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality , 1986 .

[47]  L. McDermott,et al.  Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research , 1999 .

[48]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  Swinging into thought: Directed movement guides insight in problem solving , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  John P. Rickards,et al.  Signaling, notetaking, and field independence–dependence in text comprehension and recall. , 1997 .

[50]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Topic: Cognition , 2003 .

[51]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[52]  A. Heckler.  The Role of Automatic, Bottom-Up Processes: In the Ubiquitous Patterns of Incorrect Answers to Science Questions , 2011 .

[53]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[54]  Frederick J. Brigham,et al.  An exploration of the use of eye‐gaze tracking to study problem‐solving on standardized science assessments , 2006 .

[55]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  M. Just,et al.  Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. , 1993 .

[57]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[59]  C. Koch,et al.  Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[60]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  VISUAL SALIENCY DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VISUAL SEARCH IN REAL-WORLD SCENES , 2007 .

[61]  David Hammer,et al.  Student resources for learning introductory physics , 2000 .

[62]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: INTRODUCTION TO MULTIMEDIA LEARNING , 2009 .

[63]  Rhett Allain.  Investigating the relationship between student difficulties with the concept of electric potential and the concept of rate of change , 2001 .

[64]  Derrick J. Parkhurst,et al.  Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention , 2002, Vision Research.

[65]  Laura E. Thomas,et al.  Moving eyes and moving thought: On the spatial compatibility between eye movements and cognition , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[66]  William J. Gerace,et al.  The power of simple reasoning , 1996 .

[67]  P. McLeod,et al.  Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect , 2008, Cognition.

[68]  L. Viennot.  Spontaneous Reasoning in Elementary Dynamics. , 1979 .

[69]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[70]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[71]  Tina Seufert,et al.  Cognitive load and the format of instructional aids for coherence formation , 2006 .

[72]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[73]  F. Paas,et al.  Uncovering the problem-solving process: cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[74]  Eugenia Etkina,et al.  Do Students Use and Understand Free-Body Diagrams? , 2009 .

[75]  Patricia D. Mautone,et al.  Cognitive Aids for Guiding Graph Comprehension. , 2007 .

[76]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[77]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice , 2003, Springer London.

[78]  David E. Meltzer,et al.  Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and representational format , 2005 .

[79]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[80]  Marina Bloj,et al.  Real and predicted influence of image manipulations on eye movements during scene recognition. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[81]  T. Gog,et al.  In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli , 2010 .

[82]  J. Findlay,et al.  Rapid Detection of Person Information in a Naturalistic Scene , 2008, Perception.

[83]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Eye Movements and Problem Solving , 2003, Psychological science.

[84]  Janusz Sobecki,et al.  Comparison and Analysis of the Eye Pointing Methods and Applications , 2010, ICCCI.

[85]  David Rosengrant,et al.  Comparing Experts and Novices in Solving Electrical Circuit Problems with the Help of Eye‐Tracking , 2009 .

[86]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[87]  T. Foulsham,et al.  How Does the Purpose of Inspection Influence the Potency of Visual Salience in Scene Perception? , 2007, Perception.

[88]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .

[89]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  Differences in visual attention between those who correctly and incorrectly answer physics problems , 2012 .

[90]  F. Paas,et al.  Towards a Framework for Attention Cueing in Instructional Animations: Guidelines for Research and Design , 2009 .

[91]  C. Scialfa,et al.  Age differences in the useful field of view: an eye movement analysis. , 1994, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[92]  Jose P. Mestre,et al.  Change Blindness as a Means of Studying Expertise in Physics , 2010 .

[93]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Eye movements during scene inspection: A test of the saliency map hypothesis , 2006 .

[94]  Chandralekha Singh,et al.  Student Understanding of Rotational and Rolling Motion Concepts. , 2005 .

[95]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  Inspecting Pictures for Information to Verify a Sentence: Eye Movements in General Encoding and in Focused Search , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[96]  David Rosengrant,et al.  Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts , 2003, 1602.06497.

[97]  P. Chandler,et al.  The Role of Visual Indicators in Dual Sensory Mode Instruction , 1997 .

[98]  N. Sanjay Rebello,et al.  Representational task formats and problem solving strategies in kinematics and work , 2012 .

[99]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements , 1998, Neuron.