Studies of Visual Attention in Physics Problem Solving.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Meyer. The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .
[2] J. Henderson,et al. The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .
[3] Mary Hegarty,et al. Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[4] J. Hoffman,et al. The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[5] Christof Koch,et al. A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .
[6] L. Itti,et al. Visual causes versus correlates of attentional selection in dynamic scenes , 2006, Vision Research.
[7] Katharina Scheiter,et al. The Effects of Signals on Learning from Text and Diagrams: How Looking at Diagrams Earlier and More Frequently Improves Understanding , 2010, Diagrams.
[8] Mary Hegarty,et al. Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[9] Richard K. Lowe. Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .
[10] B. Dosher,et al. The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.
[11] S. Ohlsson. Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena , 1992 .
[12] Scotty D. Craig,et al. Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy , 2002 .
[13] B. Velichkovsky. Communicating attention: Gaze position transfer in cooperative problem solving , 1995 .
[14] D. E. Irwin,et al. Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. , 1996 .
[15] David E. Irwin Robert D. Gordon. Eye Movements, Attention and Trans-saccadic Memory , 1998 .
[16] T. Foulsham,et al. Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.
[17] Stephan Schwan,et al. Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system , 2008 .
[18] Lillian C. McDermott,et al. Student difficulties in connecting graphs and physics: Examples from kinematics , 1987 .
[19] Jan Theeuwes,et al. ScanMatch: A novel method for comparing fixation sequences , 2010, Behavior research methods.
[20] F. Paas,et al. Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? , 2010 .
[21] R. F. Lorch,et al. Effects of organizational signals on free recall of expository text , 1996 .
[22] Chandralekha Singh,et al. Assessing Expertise in Introductory Physics Using Categorization Task , 2016 .
[23] Hans-Werner Gellersen,et al. Toward Mobile Eye-Based Human-Computer Interaction , 2010, IEEE Pervasive Computing.
[24] Thomas Huk,et al. Learning cell biology with close-up views or connecting lines: Evidence for the structure mapping effect , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[25] Jose P. Mestre,et al. Eye-Gaze Patterns as Students Study Worked-out Examples in Mechanics. , 2010 .
[26] H. Tabbers,et al. Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.
[27] R. B. Johnson,et al. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches , 2007 .
[28] Richard K. Lowe. Search Strategies and Inference in the Exploration of Scientific Diagrams , 1989 .
[29] Edward F. Redish,et al. Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics , 1994 .
[30] Derrick J. Parkhurst,et al. Scene content selected by active vision. , 2003, Spatial vision.
[31] K. Duncker,et al. On problem-solving , 1945 .
[32] D. Gitelman,et al. Covert Visual Spatial Orienting and Saccades: Overlapping Neural Systems , 2000, NeuroImage.
[33] David E. Brown. Students' concept of force: the importance of understanding Newton's third law , 1989 .
[34] Nancy Lockitch Loman,et al. SIGNALING TECHNIQUES THAT INCREASE THE UNDERSTANDABILITY OF EXPOSITORY PROSE , 1983 .
[35] Eric Jamet,et al. Attention guiding in multimedia learning , 2008 .
[36] Richard E. Mayer,et al. Signaling as a Cognitive Guide in Multimedia Learning , 2001 .
[37] D. Robinson,et al. Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements , 1996, Nature.
[38] G. McConkie,et al. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .
[39] H. Deubel,et al. Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.
[40] Erol Özçelik,et al. Why does signaling enhance multimedia learning? Evidence from eye movements , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[41] N. Mackworth,et al. Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[42] Alain Breuleux,et al. Effect of animation in enhancing descriptive and procedural texts in a multimedia learning environment , 1996 .
[43] Richard K. Lowe,et al. An Eye Tracking Comparison of External Pointing Cues and Internal Continuous Cues in Learning with Complex Animations , 2010 .
[44] F. Paas,et al. Attention Cueing as a Means to Enhance Learning from an Animation , 2007 .
[45] Christof Koch,et al. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects , 2006, Neural Networks.
[46] Ference Marton,et al. Phenomenography-a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality , 1986 .
[47] L. McDermott,et al. Resource Letter: PER-1: Physics Education Research , 1999 .
[48] Alejandro Lleras,et al. Swinging into thought: Directed movement guides insight in problem solving , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[49] John P. Rickards,et al. Signaling, notetaking, and field independence–dependence in text comprehension and recall. , 1997 .
[50] A. Kingstone,et al. Topic: Cognition , 2003 .
[51] P. Johnson-Laird,et al. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .
[52] A. Heckler. The Role of Automatic, Bottom-Up Processes: In the Ubiquitous Patterns of Incorrect Answers to Science Questions , 2011 .
[53] Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al. The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .
[54] Frederick J. Brigham,et al. An exploration of the use of eye‐gaze tracking to study problem‐solving on standardized science assessments , 2006 .
[55] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[56] M. Just,et al. Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. , 1993 .
[57] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[58] C. Koch,et al. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.
[59] C. Koch,et al. Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[60] Michael L. Mack,et al. VISUAL SALIENCY DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VISUAL SEARCH IN REAL-WORLD SCENES , 2007 .
[61] David Hammer,et al. Student resources for learning introductory physics , 2000 .
[62] Richard E. Mayer,et al. Multimedia Learning: INTRODUCTION TO MULTIMEDIA LEARNING , 2009 .
[63] Rhett Allain. Investigating the relationship between student difficulties with the concept of electric potential and the concept of rate of change , 2001 .
[64] Derrick J. Parkhurst,et al. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention , 2002, Vision Research.
[65] Laura E. Thomas,et al. Moving eyes and moving thought: On the spatial compatibility between eye movements and cognition , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[66] William J. Gerace,et al. The power of simple reasoning , 1996 .
[67] P. McLeod,et al. Why good thoughts block better ones: The mechanism of the pernicious Einstellung (set) effect , 2008, Cognition.
[68] L. Viennot. Spontaneous Reasoning in Elementary Dynamics. , 1979 .
[69] John Sweller,et al. Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..
[70] C. Chabris,et al. Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.
[71] Tina Seufert,et al. Cognitive load and the format of instructional aids for coherence formation , 2006 .
[72] M A Just,et al. A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.
[73] F. Paas,et al. Uncovering the problem-solving process: cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[74] Eugenia Etkina,et al. Do Students Use and Understand Free-Body Diagrams? , 2009 .
[75] Patricia D. Mautone,et al. Cognitive Aids for Guiding Graph Comprehension. , 2007 .
[76] Slava Kalyuga,et al. Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .
[77] Andrew T. Duchowski,et al. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice , 2003, Springer London.
[78] David E. Meltzer,et al. Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and representational format , 2005 .
[79] R. Desimone,et al. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.
[80] Marina Bloj,et al. Real and predicted influence of image manipulations on eye movements during scene recognition. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[81] T. Gog,et al. In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli , 2010 .
[82] J. Findlay,et al. Rapid Detection of Person Information in a Naturalistic Scene , 2008, Perception.
[83] Michael J. Spivey,et al. Eye Movements and Problem Solving , 2003, Psychological science.
[84] Janusz Sobecki,et al. Comparison and Analysis of the Eye Pointing Methods and Applications , 2010, ICCCI.
[85] David Rosengrant,et al. Comparing Experts and Novices in Solving Electrical Circuit Problems with the Help of Eye‐Tracking , 2009 .
[86] Maarten van Someren,et al. The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .
[87] T. Foulsham,et al. How Does the Purpose of Inspection Influence the Potency of Visual Salience in Scene Perception? , 2007, Perception.
[88] Robert J. Beichner,et al. Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .
[89] Lester C. Loschky,et al. Differences in visual attention between those who correctly and incorrectly answer physics problems , 2012 .
[90] F. Paas,et al. Towards a Framework for Attention Cueing in Instructional Animations: Guidelines for Research and Design , 2009 .
[91] C. Scialfa,et al. Age differences in the useful field of view: an eye movement analysis. , 1994, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.
[92] Jose P. Mestre,et al. Change Blindness as a Means of Studying Expertise in Physics , 2010 .
[93] T. Foulsham,et al. Eye movements during scene inspection: A test of the saliency map hypothesis , 2006 .
[94] Chandralekha Singh,et al. Student Understanding of Rotational and Rolling Motion Concepts. , 2005 .
[95] Geoffrey Underwood,et al. Inspecting Pictures for Information to Verify a Sentence: Eye Movements in General Encoding and in Focused Search , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[96] David Rosengrant,et al. Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts , 2003, 1602.06497.
[97] P. Chandler,et al. The Role of Visual Indicators in Dual Sensory Mode Instruction , 1997 .
[98] N. Sanjay Rebello,et al. Representational task formats and problem solving strategies in kinematics and work , 2012 .
[99] M. Corbetta,et al. A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements , 1998, Neuron.