Conflicting objectives in production forests pose a challenge for forest management

[1]  Juha Siitonen,et al.  Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland , 2000 .

[2]  Kim Pingoud,et al.  Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration , 2001 .

[3]  Juha Siitonen,et al.  Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example , 2001 .

[4]  T. Pakkala,et al.  Spatial ecology of the three-toed woodpecker in managed forest landscapes. , 2002 .

[5]  Hannu Hökkä,et al.  Models for predicting stand development in MELA System , 2002 .

[6]  A. Pekkarinen,et al.  Estimation of forest stand volumes by Landsat TM imagery and stand-level field-inventory data , 2004 .

[7]  C. Kremen Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? , 2005, Ecology letters.

[8]  Bengt Gunnar Jonsson,et al.  Ecology of Species Living on Dead Wood - Lessons for Dead Wood Management , 2005 .

[9]  Mika Lehtonen,et al.  Reusing legacy FORTRAN in the MOTTI growth and yield simulator , 2005 .

[10]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[11]  P. Fayt,et al.  Regulation of spruce bark beetles by woodpeckers: a literature review , 2005 .

[12]  Olli-Pekka Tikkanen,et al.  Red-listed boreal forest species of Finland : associations with forest structure, tree species, and decaying wood , 2006 .

[13]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services , 2006 .

[14]  H. Mäkinen,et al.  Predicting the decomposition of Scots pine, Norway spruce, and birch stems in Finland. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[15]  K. Korhonen,et al.  Sensitivity of managed boreal forests in Finland to climate change, with implications for adaptive management , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  T. P. Sullivan,et al.  Comparison of potential non-timber forest products in intensively managed young stands and mature/old-growth forests in south-central British Columbia , 2008 .

[17]  Jean-Michel Roberge,et al.  Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests - Deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning , 2008 .

[18]  Trista M. Patterson,et al.  Ecosystem services: Foundations, opportunities, and challenges for the forest products sector , 2009 .

[19]  J. Miina,et al.  Modelling the abundance and temporal variation in the production of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) in Finnish mineral soil forests. , 2009 .

[20]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[21]  T. Pukkala,et al.  Optimizing the joint production of timber and bilberries , 2010 .

[22]  A. Barbati,et al.  Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems , 2010 .

[23]  Aurore Lassauce,et al.  Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: Meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms , 2011 .

[24]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[25]  Therese M Donovan,et al.  Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  John B. Bradford,et al.  Recognizing trade‐offs in multi‐objective land management , 2012 .

[27]  T. Pakkala Spatial ecology of breeding birds in forest landscapes: an indicator species approach , 2012 .

[28]  Olli Tahvonen,et al.  Even-Aged and Uneven-Aged Forest Management in Boreal Fennoscandia: A Review , 2012, AMBIO.

[29]  H. Spiecker,et al.  How Forest Management affects Ecosystem Services, including Timber Production and Economic Return: Synergies and Trade-Offs , 2012 .

[30]  M. Ohlson,et al.  Increased growth and phenolic compounds in bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) following forest clear-cutting , 2013 .

[31]  O. Saastamoinen,et al.  Changes in wild berry picking in Finland between 1997 and 2011 , 2013 .

[32]  Henrik Andrén,et al.  Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species , 2013, Nature Communications.

[33]  Bridget A. Emmett,et al.  Exploring the ecological constraints to multiple ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity , 2013 .

[34]  D. Edwards,et al.  Maintaining ecosystem function and services in logged tropical forests. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world , 2014 .

[36]  James Aronson,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: requirements, approaches, and impacts , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[37]  K. Miettinen,et al.  Spatially dynamic forest management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Impact of forest management intensity on landscape-level mushroom productivity: A regional model-based scenario analysis , 2014 .

[39]  D. Edwards,et al.  Land‐sharing versus land‐sparing logging: reconciling timber extraction with biodiversity conservation , 2014, Global change biology.

[40]  H. Wehrden,et al.  Multifunctionality and biodiversity: Ecosystem services in temperate rainforests of the Pacific Northwest, USA , 2014 .

[41]  Hans Petersson,et al.  Eye on the Taiga: Removing Global Policy Impediments to Safeguard the Boreal Forest , 2014 .

[42]  G. Zanchi,et al.  Modelling the effects of management intensification on multiple forest services: a Swedish case study , 2014 .

[43]  Claire Kremen,et al.  Reframing the land‐sparing/land‐sharing debate for biodiversity conservation , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Tian Gao,et al.  Reviewing the strength of evidence of biodiversity indicators for forest ecosystems in Europe , 2015 .

[45]  K. Miettinen,et al.  Managing a boreal forest landscape for providing timber, storing and sequestering carbon , 2015 .

[46]  M. Marchetti,et al.  How Sensitive Are Ecosystem Services in European Forest Landscapes to Silvicultural Treatment , 2015 .

[48]  E. Nikinmaa,et al.  Environmental control of growth variation in a boreal scots pine stand – A data-driven approach , 2016 .

[49]  María Triviño,et al.  Managing boreal forests for the simultaneous production of collectable goods and timber revenues , 2016 .

[50]  Rupert Seidl,et al.  Searching for resilience: addressing the impacts of changing disturbance regimes on forest ecosystem services. , 2016, The Journal of applied ecology.

[51]  María Triviño,et al.  Data from: Optimizing management to enhance multifunctionality in a boreal forest landscape , 2017, JYX.

[52]  María Triviño,et al.  Impacts of forestry on boreal forests: An ecosystem services perspective , 2017, Ambio.

[53]  Dmitry Podkopaev,et al.  Quantifying and resolving conservation conflicts in forest landscapes via multiobjective optimization , 2017 .

[54]  H. Yousefzadeh,et al.  Genetic diversity of castanea sativa an endangered species in the hyrcanian forest , 2017 .