Subliminal Semantic Priming Changes the Dynamic Causal Influence between the Left Frontal and Temporal Cortex

Recent neuroimaging experiments have revealed that subliminal priming of a target stimulus leads to the reduction of neural activity in specific regions concerned with processing the target. Such findings lead to questions about the degree to which the subliminal priming effect is based only on decreased activity in specific local brain regions, as opposed to the influence of neural mechanisms that regulate communication between brain regions. To address this question, this study recorded EEG during performance of a subliminal semantic priming task. We adopted an information-based approach that used independent component analysis and multivariate autoregressive modeling. Results indicated that subliminal semantic priming caused significant modulation of alpha band activity in the left inferior frontal cortex and modulation of gamma band activity in the left inferior temporal regions. The multivariate autoregressive approach confirmed significant increases in information flow from the inferior frontal cortex to inferior temporal regions in the early time window that was induced by subliminal priming. In the later time window, significant enhancement of bidirectional causal flow between these two regions underlying subliminal priming was observed. Results suggest that unconscious processing of words influences not only local activity of individual brain regions but also the dynamics of neural communication between those regions.

[1]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Determination of information flow direction among brain structures by a modified directed transfer function (dDTF) method , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  Automatic Priming of Semantically Related Words Reduces Activity in the Fusiform Gyrus , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Electroencephalographic Brain Dynamics Following Manually Responded Visual Targets , 2004, PLoS biology.

[4]  Tetsuya Iidaka,et al.  EEG evidence of face-specific visual self-representation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  C. Granger Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods , 1969 .

[6]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Brain activity during reading. The effects of exposure duration and task. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  M. Bar A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Charles D. Smith,et al.  Dissociation of Automatic and Strategic Lexical-Semantics: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence for Differing Roles of Multiple Frontotemporal Regions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  L. Katz,et al.  Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  M. Bar,et al.  The effects of priming on frontal-temporal communication , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  C. J. Price,et al.  Cortical localisation of the visual and auditory word form areas: A reconsideration of the evidence , 2003, Brain and Language.

[12]  W. Singer,et al.  Hemodynamic Signals Correlate Tightly with Synchronized Gamma Oscillations , 2005, Science.

[13]  J. Millichap,et al.  Brain Activity During Reading , 1995 .

[14]  Atsushi Matsumoto,et al.  Gamma Band Synchronization and the Formation of Representations in Visual Word Processing: Evidence from Repetition and Homophone Priming , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Kiefer The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  Alex Martin,et al.  Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  Atsushi Matsumoto,et al.  Linking semantic priming effect in functional MRI and event-related potentials , 2005, NeuroImage.

[18]  Gadi Goelman,et al.  Imaging Implicit Morphological Processing: Evidence from Hebrew , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Valerie A. Carr,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Modality-Specific and Supramodal Word Processing , 2003, Neuron.

[20]  M. Kringelbach,et al.  Activation of the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus in the First 200 ms of Reading: Evidence from Magnetoencephalography (MEG) , 2009, PloS one.

[21]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Functional brain imaging based on ERD/ERS , 2001, Vision Research.

[22]  D. Schacter,et al.  Priming and the Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[23]  R. Henson,et al.  Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[25]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Repetition priming and repetition suppression: A case for enhanced efficiency through neural synchronization , 2012, Cognitive neuroscience.

[27]  F. Battaglia,et al.  Oscillations in the prefrontal cortex: a gateway to memory and attention , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[28]  Gernot G. Supp,et al.  Oscillatory MEG gamma band activity dissociates perceptual and conceptual aspects of visual object processing: A combined repetition/conceptual priming study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[29]  David M. Groppe,et al.  Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[30]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Event-related cortical desynchronization detected by power measurements of scalp EEG. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  W. Klimesch,et al.  EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[32]  M. Schmid,et al.  To see or not to see – Thalamo-cortical networks during blindsight and perceptual suppression , 2015, Progress in Neurobiology.

[33]  Wolfgang Klimesch,et al.  Alpha phase coupling reflects object recognition , 2008, NeuroImage.

[34]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. , 1980, Science.

[35]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  Jan Kujala,et al.  Neural interactions at the core of phonological and semantic priming of written words. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  W. Klimesch Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Brian T. Gold,et al.  Neural Correlates of Morphological Decomposition during Visual Word Recognition , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Unconscious Automatic Processes: Evidence from Event-related Potentials in a Masked Priming Paradigm , 2006 .

[40]  Steven L. Bressler,et al.  Wiener–Granger Causality: A well established methodology , 2011, NeuroImage.

[41]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  J B Poline,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  Michele T. Diaz,et al.  Unconscious Word Processing Engages a Distributed Network of Brain Regions , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A multimodal language region in the ventral visual pathway , 1998, Nature.

[45]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[46]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Unconscious Automatic Processes: Evidence from Event-related Potentials in a Masked Priming Paradigm , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Matthew K. Leonard,et al.  Independence of early speech processing from word meaning. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  D. Salisbury,et al.  Semantic priming increases left hemisphere theta power and intertrial phase synchrony. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[49]  Richard L. Abrams,et al.  Three Cognitive Markers of Unconscious Semantic Activation , 1996, Science.

[50]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Psychophysical “blinding” methods reveal a functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[51]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  S Makeig,et al.  Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  L. Colgin Oscillations and hippocampal–prefrontal synchrony , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[54]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[55]  R. Desimone,et al.  High-Frequency, Long-Range Coupling Between Prefrontal and Visual Cortex During Attention , 2009, Science.

[56]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Repetition priming and repetition suppression: Multiple mechanisms in need of testing , 2012, Cognitive neuroscience.

[57]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Event-related desynchronization in the alpha band and the processing of semantic information. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.