The reliability of the graded Wolf Motor Function Test for stroke

Introduction The graded Wolf Motor Function Test assesses upper limb function following stroke. Clinical utility is limited by the requirement to video record for scoring purposes. This study aimed to (a) assess whether video recording is required through examination of inter-rater reliability and agreement; and (b) assess intra-rater reliability and agreement. Method A convenience sample of 30 individuals were recruited following stroke. The graded Wolf Motor Function Test was administered within 2 weeks of rehabilitation commencement and at 3 months. Two occupational therapists scored participants through either direct observation or video. Inter- and intra-rater reliability and agreement were examined for item-level and summary scores. Results Excellent inter-rater reliability (n = 28) was found between scoring through direct observation and by video (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.9), and excellent intra-rater reliability (n = 21) was found (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.9) for item-level and summary scores. Low agreement was found between raters at the item level. Adequate agreement was found for total functional ability, with increased measurement error found for total performance time. Conclusion The graded Wolf Motor Function Test is a reliable measure of upper limb function. Video recording may not be required by therapists. In view of low agreement, future studies should assess the impact of standardised training.

[1]  C. McHorney,et al.  Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? , 1995, Quality of Life Research.

[2]  C. Winstein,et al.  Interrater Reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test–Functional Ability Scale , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.

[3]  Ruth Dundas,et al.  Estimates of the Prevalence of Acute Stroke Impairments and Disability in a Multiethnic Population , 2001, Stroke.

[4]  Angelica G. Thompson-Butel,et al.  Two Common Tests of Dexterity Can Stratify Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[5]  S. Wolf,et al.  Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients , 1989, Experimental Neurology.

[6]  Miao-Ju Hsu,et al.  Psychometric Comparisons of 4 Measures for Assessing Upper-Extremity Function in People With Stroke , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[7]  M. Levesley,et al.  Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[8]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation , 2011, The Lancet.

[9]  C. Lang,et al.  Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[10]  E. Taub,et al.  The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  N. Pereira,et al.  Translation, cultural adaptation and reliability of the brazilian version of the Graded Wolf Motor Function Test in adults with severe hemiparesis , 2015 .

[12]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[13]  D. Kamper,et al.  Carryover effects of cyclical stretching of the digits on hand function in stroke survivors. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Marshall Godwin,et al.  Health measurement scales , 1991 .

[15]  P. Feys,et al.  An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke , 2015, BMC Neurology.

[16]  Angelica G. Thompson-Butel,et al.  Comparison of Three Tools to Measure Improvements in Upper-Limb Function With Poststroke Therapy , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[17]  P. Williamson,et al.  The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise , 2014, Trials.

[18]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[19]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  D. Kamper,et al.  A Pilot Study to Assess Use of Passive Extension Bias to Facilitate Finger Movement for Repetitive Task Practice After Stroke , 2011, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[21]  D. Cicchetti.  Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[22]  E. Taub,et al.  Rehabilitation of stroke patients with plegic hands: Randomized controlled trial of expanded Constraint-Induced Movement therapy. , 2018, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[23]  Edward Taub,et al.  A method for standardizing procedures in rehabilitation: use in the extremity constraint induced therapy evaluation multisite randomized controlled trial. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  D. Arciniegas,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: efficacy for patients with minimal upper-extremity motor ability. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  A. Hrõbjartsson,et al.  Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  J. Whitall,et al.  Psychometric properties of a modified Wolf Motor Function test for people with mild and moderate upper-extremity hemiparesis. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  Kevin A Hallgren,et al.  Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. , 2012, Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology.

[28]  M. Maier,et al.  Upper Limb Outcome Measures Used in Stroke Rehabilitation Studies: A Systematic Literature Review , 2016, PloS one.

[29]  C. Terwee,et al.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.