Cholesterol Lowering in Intermediate-Risk Persons without Cardiovascular Disease.

BACKGROUND Previous trials have shown that the use of statins to lower cholesterol reduces the risk of cardiovascular events among persons without cardiovascular disease. Those trials have involved persons with elevated lipid levels or inflammatory markers and involved mainly white persons. It is unclear whether the benefits of statins can be extended to an intermediate-risk, ethnically diverse population without cardiovascular disease. METHODS In one comparison from a 2-by-2 factorial trial, we randomly assigned 12,705 participants in 21 countries who did not have cardiovascular disease and were at intermediate risk to receive rosuvastatin at a dose of 10 mg per day or placebo. The first coprimary outcome was the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke, and the second coprimary outcome additionally included revascularization, heart failure, and resuscitated cardiac arrest. The median follow-up was 5.6 years. RESULTS The overall mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 26.5% lower in the rosuvastatin group than in the placebo group. The first coprimary outcome occurred in 235 participants (3.7%) in the rosuvastatin group and in 304 participants (4.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.91; P=0.002). The results for the second coprimary outcome were consistent with the results for the first (occurring in 277 participants [4.4%] in the rosuvastatin group and in 363 participants [5.7%] in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.88; P<0.001). The results were also consistent in subgroups defined according to cardiovascular risk at baseline, lipid level, C-reactive protein level, blood pressure, and race or ethnic group. In the rosuvastatin group, there was no excess of diabetes or cancers, but there was an excess of cataract surgery (in 3.8% of the participants, vs. 3.1% in the placebo group; P=0.02) and muscle symptoms (in 5.8% of the participants, vs. 4.7% in the placebo group; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with rosuvastatin at a dose of 10 mg per day resulted in a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events than placebo in an intermediate-risk, ethnically diverse population without cardiovascular disease. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and AstraZeneca; HOPE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00468923.).

[1]  M. Gail,et al.  Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. , 1985, Biometrics.

[2]  P. Grambsch,et al.  Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals , 1994 .

[3]  Zhiliang Ying,et al.  Semiparametric regression for the mean and rate functions of recurrent events , 2000 .

[4]  D. Sackett,et al.  Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: 1. Failure to gain "coal-face" commitment and to use the uncertainty principle. , 2000, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[5]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study , 2004, The Lancet.

[6]  Yasuo Ohashi,et al.  Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with pravastatin in Japan (MEGA Study): a prospective randomised controlled trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[7]  R. Rosen,et al.  Research instruments for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction. , 2006, Urology.

[8]  P. Libby,et al.  Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Steven Hawken,et al.  Lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins as risk markers of myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): a case-control study , 2008, The Lancet.

[10]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study , 2010, The Lancet.

[11]  R. Collins,et al.  Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials , 2010, The Lancet.

[12]  M. Gnant,et al.  Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials , 2010 .

[13]  R. Collins,et al.  Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials , 2010, The Lancet.

[14]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Estimating modifiable coronary heart disease risk in multiple regions of the world: the INTERHEART Modifiable Risk Score. , 2011, European heart journal.

[15]  Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaborato The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials , 2012 .

[16]  R. Collins,et al.  The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. , 2012, Lancet.

[17]  R. Collins,et al.  The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials , 2012, The Lancet.

[18]  M. Landray,et al.  HPS2-THRIVE randomized placebo-controlled trial in 25 673 high-risk patients of ER niacin/laropiprant: trial design, pre-specified muscle and liver outcomes, and reasons for stopping study treatment , 2013, European heart journal.

[19]  M. Etminan,et al.  Statin use and risk for cataract: a nested case-control study of 2 populations in Canada and the United States. , 2014, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[20]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, BDJ.

[21]  P. Okin,et al.  Effect of Randomized Lipid Lowering With Simvastatin and Ezetimibe on Cataract Development (from the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis Study). , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 , 2015, BDJ.

[23]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Novel Approaches in Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: The HOPE-3 Trial Rationale, Design, and Participants' Baseline Characteristics. , 2016, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[24]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015 , 2016, Lancet.

[25]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Blood-Pressure and Cholesterol Lowering in Persons without Cardiovascular Disease. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Availability and affordability of cardiovascular disease medicines and their effect on use in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: an analysis of the PURE study data , 2016, The Lancet.

[27]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Blood-Pressure Lowering in Intermediate-Risk Persons without Cardiovascular Disease. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Blood-Pressure and Cholesterol Lowering in Persons without Cardiovascular Disease. , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.