Static and Dynamic User Portraits

User modeling and profiling has been used to evaluate systems and predict user behaviors for a considerable time. Models and profiles are generally constructed based on studies of users' behavior patterns, cognitive characteristics, or demographic data and provide an efficient way to present users' preferences and interests. However, such modeling focuses on users' interactions with a system and cannot support complicated social interaction, which is the emerging focus of serious games, educational hypermedia systems, experience, and service design. On the other hand, personas are used to portray and represent different groups and types of users and help designers propose suitable solutions in iterative design processes. However, clear guidelines and research approaches for developing useful personas for large-scale and complex social networks have not been well established. In this research, we reflect on three different design studies related to social interaction, experience, and cross-platform service design to discuss multiple ways of identifying both direct users and invisible users in design research. In addition, research methods and attributes to portray users are discussed.

[1]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  User Modeling in Human–Computer Interaction , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[2]  G. L. Shostack Designing Services That Deliver , 1996 .

[3]  J. William Pfeiffer,et al.  Applied Strategic Planning , 1994 .

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[5]  Chris Chapman,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Personas as Information , 2008 .

[6]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design: an emergent view of system design , 1990, CHI '90.

[7]  B. Mark Organizational culture. , 1996, Annual review of nursing research.

[8]  Ko-Hsun Huang,et al.  Clubs Forming on Crazyvote -The Blurred Social Boundary Between Online Communities and the Real World , 2009 .

[9]  Rjoè,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work , 2005 .

[10]  Chris Chapman,et al.  The Personas' New Clothes: Methodological and Practical Arguments against a Popular Method , 2006 .

[11]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Faster, cheaper, deeper user research , 2010 .

[12]  Mon-Chu Chen,et al.  HappyFeet! influencing at the turning points: walking or scooter ride for short-distance journey? , 2010, Mobile HCI.

[13]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[14]  А. А. Анплеев Organizational culture and leadership, Edgar H. Schein, USA, 989 market street, San Francisco, 2004 год, 438 с. , организационная культура и лидерство, www. Josseybass. Com , 2011 .

[15]  Hendrik Drachsler,et al.  Personal recommender systems for learners in lifelong learning networks: the requirements, techniques and model , 2008, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[16]  Vincent P. Wade,et al.  Adaptive educational hypermedia systems in technology enhanced learning: a literature review , 2010, SIGITE '10.

[17]  Morten Fjeld,et al.  Physical and Virtual Tools: Activity Theory Applied to the Design of Groupware , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[18]  T. Deal,et al.  Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. , 1982 .

[19]  Jorge Edwards,et al.  Persona Non Grata , 1973 .

[20]  Paul Rothstein a ( x 4 ) : a user-centered method for designing experience , 2002 .

[21]  Alissa Nicole Antle,et al.  Child-personas: fact or fiction? , 2006, DIS '06.

[22]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[23]  Y. Aharoni Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1992 .

[24]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[25]  G. Fitzpatrick The Locales Framework , 2003, The Springer International series on Computer Supported Cooperative Work.

[26]  L. Terveen,et al.  Becoming Wikipedian : Transformation of Participation in a Collaborative Online Encyclopedia , 2009 .

[27]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design , 2000, TCHI.

[28]  Elaine M. Raybourn,et al.  Applying simulation experience design methods to creating serious game-based adaptive training systems , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[29]  Fang-Wu Tung,et al.  Increasing social presence of social actors in e-learning environments: Effects of dynamic and static emoticons on children , 2007, Displays.

[30]  Josep Lluís de la Rosa i Esteva,et al.  A Taxonomy of Recommender Agents on the Internet , 2003, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[31]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research , 1982 .

[32]  Demetrios G. Sampson,et al.  Adaptive Learning Resources Sequencing in Educational Hypermedia Systems , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[33]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[34]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with NVivo , 2002 .

[35]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[36]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[37]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[38]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Innovation in Experiential Services - An Empirical View , 2007 .

[39]  Michael R. McGrath,et al.  The transformation of organizational cultures: A competing values perspective. , 1985 .

[40]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Service Blueprinting: A Practical Technique for Service Innovation , 2008 .

[41]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  A logical characterization of adaptive educational hypermedia , 2004, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[42]  Fang-Wu Tung,et al.  Designing social presence in e-learning environments: Testing the effect of interactivity on children , 2006, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[43]  John Zeisel,et al.  Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behaviour Research , 1984 .

[44]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Beyond Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[45]  John L. Bennett,et al.  Usability Engineering: Our Experience and Evolution , 1988 .

[46]  E. Horvitz,et al.  Personalised hypermedia presentation techniques for improving online customer relationships , 2001, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[47]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[48]  Kristi Jackson,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo , 2007 .

[49]  John Zeisel,et al.  Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behavior Research , 1981 .

[50]  J. Creswell,et al.  Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry , 2000 .

[51]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[52]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[53]  H. Spencer-Oatey Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures , 2004 .

[54]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Design Research: Methods and Perspectives , 2003 .

[55]  Darryl Charles,et al.  Player-Centred Game Design : Player Modelling and Adaptive Digital Games , 2005 .

[56]  S. Bruyn,et al.  Studies in Ethnomethodology. By Harold Garfinkel. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1967. 288 pp. $6.95 , 1968 .

[57]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[58]  Nuno Jardim Nunes,et al.  Hammering Models: Designing Usable Modeling Tools , 2011, INTERACT.

[59]  Rob Koper,et al.  Learning Networks: connecting people, organizations, autonomous agents and learning resources to establish the emergence of effective lifelong learning , 2002 .

[60]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (2nd Edition) , 1999 .

[61]  Sri Hastuti Kurniawan,et al.  Review of Interaction design , 2003 .

[62]  Kari Rönkkö,et al.  An Empirical Study Demonstrating How Different Design Constraints, Project Organization and Contexts Limited the Utility of Personas , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[63]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[64]  Neil A. M. Maiden,et al.  How Culture Might Impact on the Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning Packages , 2000, CAiSE.

[65]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptive Hypermedia , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[66]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[67]  William I. Gorden Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life , 1984 .

[68]  Wendy Hall,et al.  An Evaluation of Adapted Hypermedia Techniques Using Static User Modelling , 1998 .

[69]  Ko-Hsun Huang,et al.  Social Interaction Design in Cultural Context: A Case Study of a Traditional Social Activity , 2008 .

[70]  M. Erez,et al.  A Dynamic, Multi‐Level Model of Culture: From the Micro Level of the Individual to the Macro Level of a Global Culture , 2004 .

[71]  Steve Portigal,et al.  TRUE TALESPersona non grata , 2008, INTR.

[72]  Christina Wasson Ethnography in the Field of Design , 2000 .

[73]  Alissa Nicole Antle,et al.  Child-based personas: need, ability and experience , 2008, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[74]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[75]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[76]  C. Hampden-Turner,et al.  Riding the Waves of Culture. Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business (3rd ed) , 1993 .

[77]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.

[78]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  Conceptualizing Tangible Augmented Reality Systems for Design Learning , 2008 .

[79]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[80]  Alistair Cockburn,et al.  Writing Effective Use Cases , 2000 .

[81]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[82]  Tomasz Miaskiewicz,et al.  Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? , 2011 .

[83]  B. Nardi Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition , 1995 .