Fairness and using reflective journals in assessment

This study looks at the fairness of assessing learning journals both as the fairness in creating a valid and robust marking process as well as how different student groups may have unfair disadvantages in performing well in reflective assessment tasks. The fairness of a marking process is discussed through reflecting on the practical process and concluded with a cautionary note on the challenges on the path to a valid and robust process. A quantitative process is applied to studying the learning journals themselves. This analysis uncovers a reality of relatively low starting levels for reflection and potential barriers to reflection grounded in culture, gender and language. The importance of formative and summative assessment, guidance on how to reflect as well as sensitivity to the cohort are offered as practical implications to others introducing reflection as part of assessment.

[1]  H. Harris.  Promoting Ethical Reflection in the Teaching of Business Ethics , 2008 .

[2]  Donna Varner,et al.  Learning From Learning Journals: The Benefits And Challenges Of Using Learning Journal Assignments , 2003 .

[3]  J. Morse.  Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction , 1996 .

[4]  L. Dee Fink,et al.  Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching , 2002 .

[5]  K. Thorpe.  Reflective learning journals: From concept to practice , 2004 .

[6]  F. Dochy,et al.  Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review1 , 2005 .

[7]  M. Pantti,et al.  Flagging Finnishness: Reproducing National Identity in Reality Television , 2007 .

[8]  F. Neil Brady,et al.  A Systematic Approach to Teaching Ethics in Business , 1999 .

[9]  Michael Reynolds,et al.  Reflection and Critical Reflection in Management Learning , 1998 .

[10]  D. Boud.  Using Journal Writing to Enhance Reflective Practice , 2001 .

[11]  L. N. Karlovic,et al.  Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. Jack Mezirow. 1990. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. , 1992, Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education.

[12]  B. Macfarlane,et al.  The reflection game: enacting the penitent self , 2009 .

[13]  Ann L. Cunliffe,et al.  On Becoming a Critically Reflexive Practitioner , 2004 .

[14]  S. Elo,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2014 .

[15]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  Higher Education: A Critical Business , 1997 .

[16]  D. Boud,et al.  Promoting Reflection in Learning: a Model , 2013 .

[17]  Donal Carbaugh,et al.  Coding Personhood Through Cultural Terms and Practices , 2006 .

[18]  S. Laditka,et al.  ‘Student-Developed Case Studies: An Experiential Approach for Teaching Ethics in Management’ , 2006 .

[19]  K. Fisher,et al.  Raising the Bar on Criticality: Students’ Critical Reflection in an Internship Program , 2006 .

[20]  J. Mezirow.  Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning , 1991 .

[21]  R. Mladenovic,et al.  A critical evaluation of the usefulness of a coding scheme to categorise levels of reflective thinking , 2011 .

[22]  D. Kember,et al.  Developing Curricula to Encourage Students to Write Reflective Journals , 1996 .

[23]  David Kember,et al.  A four‐category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work , 2008 .

[24]  Jae-Won Moon.  Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[25]  David Kember,et al.  Determining the level of reflective thinking from students' written journals using a coding scheme based on the work of Mezirow , 1999 .

[26]  L. Fink,et al.  Team-based learning : a transformative use of small groups , 2002 .

[27]  G. Boulton‐Lewis.  Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[28]  J. Mezirow,et al.  How Critical Reflection Triggers Transformative Learning , 2002 .