Assessment of Image-Guided Interventions

[1]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  S Hassfeld,et al.  Risk analysis and safety assessment in surgical robotics: A case study on a biopsy robot , 2005, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[3]  Danielle Giroud.  A revised guideline for medical device clinical investigations: ISO 14155 Part 1 and 2: 2003 , 2004 .

[4]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Experienced laparoscopic surgeons are automated to the "fulcrum effect": an ergonomic demonstration. , 1999, Endoscopy.

[5]  Dennis G. Fryback,et al.  The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  Sandra Martelli,et al.  Criteria of interface evaluation for computer assisted surgery systems , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  Klaus Radermacher,et al.  The state off 3-D technology and evaluation , 1996 .

[8]  Cost Analysis of Computer-Aided Endoscopic Sinus Surgery , 2001, American journal of rhinology.

[9]  C. H. Evans,et al.  Small Clinical Trials: Issues and Challenges , 2001 .

[10]  U. Matern,et al.  Instruments for minimally invasive surgery , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  E. Kuhry,et al.  Safety and efficacy of endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[12]  S. Pocock,et al.  Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach , 1984 .

[13]  Frank Langlotz,et al.  Augmenting the effective field of view of optical tracking cameras - a way to overcome difficulties during intraoperative camera alignment , 2006, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[14]  Sunanda Mitra,et al.  Toward the Improvement of Image-Guided Interventions for Minimally Invasive Surgery: Three Factors That Affect Performance , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[15]  W. Korb,et al.  Evaluation of a Navigation System for ENT with Surgical Efficiency Criteria , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[16]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[17]  Pierre Jannin,et al.  Model for defining and reporting reference-based validation protocols in medical image processing , 2006, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[18]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[19]  Osman Balci.  Verification, validation, and certification of modeling and simulation applications , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 2003..

[20]  Richard H. M. Goossens,et al.  Assessment of ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery. , 2001, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[21]  Jay B. West,et al.  The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  D. Thomas,et al.  Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of interactive image-guided craniotomy: clinical comparison between conventional and image-guided meningioma surgery. , 2000, Neurosurgery.

[23]  E. Buskens,et al.  Randomized clinical trial and follow‐up study of cost‐effectiveness of laparoscopic versus conventional Nissen fundoplication , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[24]  A A Nelson,et al.  Research design: measurement, reliability, and validity. , 1980, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[25]  G. White,et al.  Does intraoperative hepatic ultrasonography change surgical decision making during liver resection? , 1994, American journal of surgery.

[26]  D. Meijer,et al.  New ergonomic design criteria for handles of laparoscopic dissection forceps. , 2001, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.