Visceral Mobile Music Systems

This paper describes a second-generation mobile music system that adds qualities of physical interaction to previous participative, networked, multi-user systems. We call upon traditions in interactive sensor music instrument building to inform this process. The resulting system underscores its dual personal/community context awareness with a technique of hybrid audio display. This allows the system to exhibit qualities of reflexive social translucence providing a view of the group all while giving each member of the group a responsive sense of agency. The visceral mobile music system was tested in a theatre environment with manageable location tracking and creative non-musical test subjects. The combination of musical practice and interaction design establish artistic creativity as an important component of the research process.

[1]  Scot Gresham-Lancaster The Aesthetics and History of the Hub: The Effects of Changing Technology on Network Computer Music , 1998 .

[2]  Mark Weiser,et al.  Creating the invisible interface: (invited talk) , 1994, UIST '94.

[3]  Arianna Bassoli,et al.  Stefan Agamanolis: "TunA: A Mobile Music Experience to Foster Local Interactions , 2003 .

[4]  W. Benjamin The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction , 2018, A Museum Studies Approach to Heritage.

[5]  Stephen Travis Pope Editor's Notes: The Second Dilemma, or Tape Music: The Poor Cousin , 1991 .

[6]  Lars Erik Holmquist,et al.  Sonic City: The Urban Environment as a Musical Interface , 2003, NIME.

[7]  M. Weiser,et al.  Creating the Invisible Interface , 1994 .

[8]  Atau Tanaka,et al.  Global String: A Musical Instrument for Hybrid Space , 2002, ICMC.

[9]  Michel Waisvisz,et al.  The Hands: A Set of Remote MIDI-Controllers , 1985, ICMC.

[10]  Leigh Landy,et al.  Understanding the Art of Sound Organization , 2007 .

[11]  Atau Tanaka Mobile Music Making , 2004, NIME.

[12]  M Ausloos,et al.  Uncovering collective listening habits and music genres in bipartite networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Marcelo M. Wanderley,et al.  Trends in Gestural Control of Music , 2000 .

[14]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Consuming music together : social and collaborative aspects of music consumption technologies , 2006 .

[15]  Steve Benford,et al.  Orchestrating a mixed reality performance , 2001, CHI.

[16]  Max V. Mathews The radio baton and conductor program, or, pitch, the most important and least expressive part of music , 1991 .

[17]  Chris Chafe,et al.  Effect of Time Delay on Ensemble Accuracy , 2004 .

[18]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes , 2000, TCHI.

[19]  Robert A. Moog,et al.  Theremin: Ether Music and Espionage , 2000 .

[20]  Atau Tanaka,et al.  Instant archaeologies: digital lenses to probe and to perforate the urban fabric , 2006, MM '06.

[21]  Atau Tanaka,et al.  Musical Performance Practice on Sensor-based Instruments , 2000 .