Footprint characteristics revised for field‐scale soil moisture monitoring with cosmic‐ray neutrons

Cosmic‐ray neutron probes are widely used to monitor environmental water content near the surface. The method averages over tens of hectares and is unrivaled in serving representative data for agriculture and hydrological models at the hectometer scale. Recent experiments, however, indicate that the sensor response to environmental heterogeneity is not fully understood. Knowledge of the support volume is a prerequisite for the proper interpretation and validation of hydrogeophysical data. In a previous study, several physical simplifications have been introduced into a neutron transport model in order to derive the characteristics of the cosmic‐ray probe's footprint. We utilize a refined source and energy spectrum for cosmic‐ray neutrons and simulate their response to a variety of environmental conditions. Results indicate that the method is particularly sensitive to soil moisture in the first tens of meters around the probe, whereas the radial weights are changing dynamically with ambient water. The footprint radius ranges from 130 to 240 m depending on air humidity, soil moisture, and vegetation. The moisture‐dependent penetration depth of 15 to 83 cm decreases exponentially with distance to the sensor. However, the footprint circle remains almost isotropic in complex terrain with nearby rivers, roads or hill slopes. Our findings suggest that a dynamically weighted average of point measurements is essential for accurate calibration and validation. The new insights will have important impact on signal interpretation, sensor installation, data interpolation from mobile surveys, and the choice of appropriate resolutions for data assimilation into hydrological models.

[1]  Zhongli Zhu,et al.  Observation on Soil Moisture of Irrigation Cropland by Cosmic-Ray Probe , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[2]  B. Diekkrüger,et al.  Spatio-temporal soil moisture patterns - A meta-analysis using plot to catchment scale data , 2015 .

[3]  Scott B. Jones,et al.  Measured and Modeled Soil Moisture Compared with Cosmic‐Ray Neutron Probe Estimates in a Mixed Forest , 2014 .

[4]  Craig S. T. Daughtry,et al.  Field-scale moisture estimates using COSMOS sensors: A validation study with temporary networks and Leaf-Area-Indices , 2014 .

[5]  P. Vaz,et al.  Comparison of unfolding codes for neutron spectrometry with Bonner spheres. , 2014, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[6]  W. Rühm,et al.  Comparison of Bonner sphere responses calculated by different Monte Carlo codes at energies between 1 MeV and 1 GeV – Potential impact on neutron dosimetry at energies higher than 20 MeV , 2014 .

[7]  Auro C. Almeida,et al.  Field testing of the universal calibration function for determination of soil moisture with cosmic‐ray neutrons , 2014 .

[8]  J. Wallace,et al.  Calibration and correction procedures for cosmic‐ray neutron soil moisture probes located across Australia , 2014 .

[9]  Asim Biswas Season- and depth-dependent time stability for characterising representative monitoring locations of soil water storage in a hummocky landscape , 2014 .

[10]  Shuguo Wang,et al.  Soil Moisture Estimation Using Cosmic-Ray Soil Moisture Sensing at Heterogeneous Farmland , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[11]  Michael H. Cosh,et al.  Calibration and Validation of the COSMOS Rover for Surface Soil Moisture Measurement , 2014 .

[12]  Tatsuhiko Sato,et al.  Scaling in situ cosmogenic nuclide production rates using analytical approximations to atmospheric cosmic-ray fluxes , 2014 .

[13]  Marek G Zreda,et al.  Quantifying mesoscale soil moisture with the cosmic-ray rover , 2013 .

[14]  P. Blasi Recent Results in Cosmic Ray Physics and Their Interpretation , 2013, 1312.1590.

[15]  Rafael Rosolem,et al.  The Effect of Atmospheric Water Vapor on Neutron Count in the Cosmic-Ray Soil Moisture Observing System , 2013 .

[16]  C. Zweck,et al.  Snow shielding factors for cosmogenic nuclide dating inferred from Monte Carlo neutron transport simulations , 2013 .

[17]  Rafael Rosolem,et al.  An assessment of the effect of horizontal soil moisture heterogeneity on the area‐average measurement of cosmic‐ray neutrons , 2013 .

[18]  H. Hendricks Franssen,et al.  Accuracy of the cosmic‐ray soil water content probe in humid forest ecosystems: The worst case scenario , 2013 .

[19]  W. James Shuttleworth,et al.  Ecosystem‐scale measurements of biomass water using cosmic ray neutrons , 2013 .

[20]  Rafael Rosolem,et al.  The COsmic-ray Soil Moisture Interaction Code (COSMIC) for use in data assimilation , 2013 .

[21]  M. Zreda,et al.  Footprint diameter for a cosmic‐ray soil moisture probe: Theory and Monte Carlo simulations , 2013 .

[22]  W. Boynton,et al.  Diurnal Variations in MSL DAN Passive Measurements with Atmospheric Pressure and Soil Temperature , 2013 .

[23]  A. Nesterenok Numerical calculations of cosmic ray cascade in the Earth’s atmosphere – Results for nucleon spectra , 2013 .

[24]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  COSMOS: the COsmic-ray Soil Moisture Observing System , 2012 .

[25]  T. Ferré,et al.  Field Validation of a Cosmic‐Ray Neutron Sensor Using a Distributed Sensor Network , 2012 .

[26]  Benoit Forget,et al.  The OpenMC Monte Carlo particle transport code , 2012 .

[27]  Rafael Rosolem,et al.  A universal calibration function for determination of soil moisture with cosmic-ray neutrons , 2012 .

[28]  Rafael Rosolem,et al.  Measurement depth of the cosmic ray soil moisture probe affected by hydrogen from various sources , 2012 .

[29]  P. Yepes,et al.  Comparisons of several transport models in their predictions in typical space radiation environments , 2012 .

[30]  N. M. Larson,et al.  ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data , 2011 .

[31]  C. Grimani,et al.  Galactic cosmic-ray energy spectra and expected solar events at the time of future space missions , 2011 .

[32]  K. Shibata,et al.  JENDL-4.0: A New Library for Nuclear Science and Engineering , 2011 .

[33]  T. Ferré,et al.  Nature's neutron probe: Land surface hydrology at an elusive scale with cosmic rays , 2010 .

[34]  B. Merz,et al.  The benefits of gravimeter observations for modelling water storage changes at the field scale , 2010 .

[35]  S. Okubo,et al.  Hydrological modeling of groundwater disturbances to observed gravity: Theory and application to Asama Volcano, Central Japan , 2009 .

[36]  F. Lei,et al.  SEU Rates in Atmospheric Environments: Variations Due to Cross-Section Fits and Environment Models , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[37]  E. Small,et al.  Use of GPS receivers as a soil moisture network for water cycle studies , 2008 .

[38]  R. Scott,et al.  Measuring soil moisture content non‐invasively at intermediate spatial scale using cosmic‐ray neutrons , 2008 .

[39]  R K Podgorney,et al.  Surface and downhole prospecting tools for planetary exploration: tests of neutron and gamma ray probes. , 2008, Astrobiology.

[40]  Lembit Sihver,et al.  Development of PARMA: PHITS-based Analytical Radiation Model in the Atmosphere , 2008, Radiation research.

[41]  J. Vrugt,et al.  On the value of soil moisture measurements in vadose zone hydrology: A review , 2008 .

[42]  Edward R. Siciliano,et al.  Passive neutron detection for interdiction of nuclear material at borders , 2008 .

[43]  Gerardo Aliberti,et al.  Validation of Simulation Codes for Future Systems: Motivations, Approach and the Role of Nuclear Data , 2007 .

[44]  Y. Kerr,et al.  Operational readiness of microwave remote sensing of soil moisture for hydrologic applications , 2007 .

[45]  T. Harter,et al.  Upscaling Hydraulic Properties and Soil Water Flow Processes in Heterogeneous Soils: A Review , 2007 .

[46]  Koji Niita,et al.  Analytical Functions to Predict Cosmic-Ray Neutron Spectra in the Atmosphere , 2006, Radiation research.

[47]  W. Feldman,et al.  MCNPX benchmark for cosmic ray interactions with the Moon , 2006 .

[48]  Fan Lei,et al.  Improvements to and Validations of the QinetiQ Atmospheric Radiation Model (QARM) , 2005, 2005 8th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems.

[49]  Takashi S. Nakamura,et al.  Evaluation of the Altitude Variation of the Cosmic-ray Induced Environmental Neutrons in the Mt. Fuji Area , 2005 .

[50]  J. Wilson,et al.  The energy spectrum of cosmic-ray induced neutrons measured on an airplane over a wide range of altitude and latitude. , 2004, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[51]  S. Maurice,et al.  Reduction of neutron data from Lunar Prospector , 2004 .

[52]  J. Roy,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Sounding: New Method for Ground Water Assessment , 2004, Ground water.

[53]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes , 2004 .

[54]  V. A. Zakharov,et al.  Neutron flux variations near the Earth?s crust. A possible tectonic activity detection , 2003 .

[55]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Measuring Soil Water Content with Ground Penetrating Radar: A Review , 2003 .

[56]  S. Maurice,et al.  Small‐area thorium features on the lunar surface , 2003 .

[57]  R. Sheu,et al.  COSMIC-RAY-INDUCED NEUTRON SPECTRA AND EFFECTIVE DOSE RATES NEAR AIR/GROUND AND AIR/WATER INTERFACES IN TAIWAN , 2003, Health physics.

[58]  Jean-Michel Baltassat,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance as a geophysical tool for hydrogeologists , 2002 .

[59]  R C Singleterry,et al.  Measurement of the energy spectrum of cosmic-ray induced neutrons aboard an ER-2 high-altitude airplane. , 2002, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment.

[60]  F. Phillips,et al.  Terrestrial in situ cosmogenic nuclides: theory and application , 2001 .

[61]  John Knight,et al.  The sample areas of conventional and alternative time domain reflectometry probes , 1998 .

[62]  P. Rinard Neutron Interactions with Matter , 1997 .

[63]  R. Kachanoski,et al.  Spatial averaging of water content by time domain reflectometry : Implications for twin rod probes with and without dielectric coatings , 1996 .

[64]  E. Normand,et al.  Guidelines for predicting single-event upsets in neutron environments (RAM devices) , 1991 .

[65]  N. Hertel,et al.  The response of bonner spheres to neutrons from thermal energies to 17.3 MeV , 1985 .

[66]  V. Toneev,et al.  Cascade-exciton model of nuclear reactions , 1983 .

[67]  L. Barkov,et al.  Measurement of the slowing down of neutrons in the energy range 1·46−0·025 eV in water☆ , 1957 .

[68]  Raymond L. Murray,et al.  The Elements of Nuclear Reactor Theory , 1953 .

[69]  G. Pfotzer Dreifachkoinzidenzen der Ultrastrahlung aus vertikaler Richtung in der StratosphÄre , 1936 .

[70]  Georg Pfotzer,et al.  Dreifachkoinzidenzen der Ultrastrahlung aus vertikaler Richtung in der StratosphÄre , 1936 .

[71]  Beer Bestimmung der Absorption des rothen Lichts in farbigen Flüssigkeiten , 1852 .