Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics

A framework for pragmatic analysis is proposed which treats discourse as a game, with context as a scoreboard organized around the questions under discussion by the interlocutors. The framework is intended to be coordinated with a dynamic compositional semantics. Accordingly, the context of utterance is modeled as a tuple of different types of information, and the questions therein — modeled, as is usual in formal semantics, as alternative sets of propositions — constrain the felicitous flow of discourse. A requirement of Relevance is satisfied by an utterance (whether an assertion, a question or a suggestion) iff it addresses the question under discussion. Finally, it is argued that the prosodic focus of an utterance canonically serves to reflect the question under discussion (at least in English), placing additional constraints on felicity in context. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.6 BibTeX info

[1]  Stephen Robert Berman,et al.  On the semantics and logical form of {\it wh\/} -clauses , 1991 .

[2]  Robert Stalnaker,et al.  Presuppositions of Compound Sentences , 2008 .

[3]  M. Halliday.  NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .

[5]  Enric Vallduví,et al.  The Informational Component , 1990 .

[6]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication. , 1992 .

[7]  Mats Rooth.  A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[8]  C. L. Hamblin.  QUESTIONS IN MONTAGUE ENGLISH , 1976 .

[9]  Mike Calcagno,et al.  Presupposition, Congruence and Adverbs of Quantification , 1996 .

[10]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[11]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[12]  Joachim Jacobs,et al.  Informationsstruktur und Grammatik , 1992 .

[13]  Godehard Link.  The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice‐theoretical Approach , 2008 .

[14]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Accommodation, Meaning, and Implicature: Interdisciplinary Foundations for Pragmatics , 2003 .

[15]  N. Kadmon,et al.  Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus , 2001 .

[16]  Laurence R. Horn.  Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic Ambiguity , 1985 .

[17]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[18]  Pauline Jacobson.  On the Quantificational Force of English Free Relatives , 1995 .

[19]  Christoph Schwarze,et al.  Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language , 1983 .

[20]  P. Blitvich.  Levinson, Stephen C. , 2012 .

[21]  Laurence R. Horn.  A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[22]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1989 .

[23]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Informational redundancy and resource bounds in dialogue , 1993 .

[24]  David Lewis.  Convention: A Philosophical Study , 1986 .

[25]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Quantification in Natural Languages , 1995 .

[26]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  On the logic of an interrogative model of scientific inquiry , 1981, Synthese.

[27]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English , 1982 .

[28]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Type-shifting rules and the semantics of interrogatives , 1988 .

[29]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse , 1986, CL.

[30]  P. Portner,et al.  The Semantics and Pragmatics of Topic Phrases , 1998 .

[31]  J. Pierrehumbert.  The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[32]  C. Raymond Perrault.  An application of default logic to speech act theory , 1987 .

[33]  P. Portner.  Situation theory and the semantics of propositional expressions , 1992 .

[34]  D. Ladd.  The structure of intonational meaning , 1978 .

[35]  Irene Heim,et al.  On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions , 2008 .

[36]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  Logic, Language-Games And Information , 1972 .

[37]  D. Bolinger.  Contrastive Accent and Contrastive Stress , 1961 .

[38]  Irene Heim,et al.  Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs , 1992, J. Semant..

[39]  B. Partee.  Topic, Focus and Quantification , 1991 .

[40]  J. Hintikka,et al.  Information-seeking dialogues: Some of their logical properties , 1979 .

[41]  J. Hintikka.  Logic, language-games and information : Kantian themes in the philosophy of logic , 1973 .

[42]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[43]  Shalom Lappin,et al.  当代语义理论指南 = The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory , 2015 .

[44]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[45]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions , 1991 .

[46]  Lauri Carlson.  Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis , 1982 .

[47]  William C. Mann,et al.  RHETORICAL STRUCTURE THEORY: A THEORY OF TEXT ORGANIZATION , 1987 .

[48]  Association Focus , 1999 .

[49]  H. D. Swart,et al.  Adverbs of quantification : a generalized quantifier approach , 1993 .

[50]  Michael Rochemont,et al.  Stress and Focus in English , 1983 .

[51]  P. Culicover,et al.  English Focus Constructions and the Theory of Grammar , 1990 .

[52]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  A theory of scalar implicature , 1985 .

[53]  A. Goldman.  Theory of Human Action , 1970 .

[54]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers , 1984 .

[55]  Katherine Alice Welker.  Plans in the common ground : toward a generative account of conversational implicature , 1994 .

[56]  Kai-Uwe Von Fintel,et al.  Restrictions on quantifier domains , 1994 .

[57]  Martha E. Pollack,et al.  Inferring domain plans in question-answering , 1986 .

[58]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Domain Restriction in Dynamic Semantics , 1995 .

[59]  Irene Heim,et al.  The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases : a dissertation , 1982 .