AK-PDF: An active learning method combining kriging and probability density function for efficient reliability analysis

An important challenge in structural reliability is to reduce the number of calls to evaluate the performance function, especially the complex implicit performance functions. To reduce the computational burden and improve the reliability analysis efficiency, a new active learning method is developed to consider the probability density function of samples based on the learning function U in an active learning reliability method that combines the kriging and Monte Carlo simulation. In the proposed method, the proposed active learning function contains two parts: part A is based on function U, and part B is based on the probability density function and function U. By changing the weights of parts A and B, the sample points close the limit-state function, and those in the region with a higher probability density function have more weight to be selected compared to the others. Subsequently, the kriging model can be constructed more effectively. The proposed method avoids a large number of time-consuming function evaluations, and the recommended weight is also reported. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated through three numerical examples and one engineering example. The results demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method.

[1]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Probabilistic fatigue life prediction and reliability assessment of a high pressure turbine disc considering load variations , 2017 .

[2]  Wang Chien Ming,et al.  A new active learning method based on the learning function U of the AK-MCS reliability analysis method , 2017 .

[3]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[4]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[5]  Zhangchun Tang,et al.  A surrogate‐based iterative importance sampling method for structural reliability analysis , 2018, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[6]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox, Version 2.0 , 2002 .

[7]  Shui Yu,et al.  Sequential time-dependent reliability analysis for the lower extremity exoskeleton under uncertainty , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Pedro G. Coelho,et al.  Structural reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks , 2008, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[9]  Hongping Zhu,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by AK–SS: An active learning method combining Kriging and Subset Simulation , 2016 .

[10]  M. Eldred,et al.  Multimodal Reliability Assessment for Complex Engineering Applications using Efficient Global Optimization , 2007 .

[11]  Ikjin Lee,et al.  A Novel Second-Order Reliability Method (SORM) Using Noncentral or Generalized Chi-Squared Distributions , 2012 .

[12]  G. Matheron The intrinsic random functions and their applications , 1973, Advances in Applied Probability.

[13]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[14]  Y Liu,et al.  Reliability analysis of series systems with multiple failure modes under epistemic and aleatory uncertainties , 2012 .

[15]  Zdeněk Kala,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis of reliability of structural bridge system , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[16]  Pan Wang,et al.  A new learning function for Kriging and its applications to solve reliability problems in engineering , 2015, Comput. Math. Appl..

[17]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Comparison of bootstrapped artificial neural networks and quadratic response surfaces for the estimation of the functional failure probability of a thermal-hydraulic passive system , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[19]  Quanwang Li,et al.  Moment-based evaluation of structural reliability , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  L. Schueremans,et al.  Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[21]  Qiusheng Li,et al.  A new artificial neural network-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[22]  Ming Jian Zuo,et al.  A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Marvin K. Nakayama,et al.  Efficient Monte Carlo methods for estimating failure probabilities , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Jerome Sacks,et al.  Designs for Computer Experiments , 1989 .

[25]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Reliability analysis and updating of deteriorating systems with subset simulation , 2017 .

[27]  Ning-Cong Xiao,et al.  Adaptive kriging-based efficient reliability method for structural systems with multiple failure modes and mixed variables , 2020 .

[28]  Andrew M. Stuart,et al.  How Deep Are Deep Gaussian Processes? , 2017, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[29]  G. Ricciardi,et al.  A new sampling strategy for SVM-based response surface for structural reliability analysis , 2015 .

[30]  Jian Wang,et al.  LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[31]  Pan Wang,et al.  Efficient structural reliability analysis method based on advanced Kriging model , 2015 .

[32]  M. Eldred,et al.  Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions , 2008 .

[33]  Haobin Jiang,et al.  Multi-objective reliability-based design optimization for the VRB-VCS FLB under front-impact collision , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[34]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Adaptive virtual support vector machine for reliability analysis of high-dimensional problems , 2012, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[35]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Sequential importance sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2016 .

[36]  M. J. Fadaee,et al.  Efficient reliability analysis of laminated composites using advanced Kriging surrogate model , 2016 .

[37]  George E. Karniadakis,et al.  Deep Multi-fidelity Gaussian Processes , 2016, ArXiv.

[38]  Irfan Kaymaz,et al.  Application Of Kriging Method To Structural Reliability Problems , 2005 .

[39]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[40]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[41]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[42]  Xufang Zhang,et al.  A new direct second-order reliability analysis method , 2018 .

[43]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  M5 model tree and Monte Carlo simulation for efficient structural reliability analysis , 2017 .

[44]  Wang Jian,et al.  Two accuracy measures of the Kriging model for structural reliability analysis , 2017 .