The Impact of a Dedicated “Hot List” on the In-Patient Management of Patients With Acute Gallstone-Related Disease

Background: Index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard of care for patients admitted to hospital with symptomatic acute cholecystitis. The same standard applies to patients suffering with mild acute biliary pancreatitis. Operating theatre capacity can be a significant constraint to same admission surgery. This study assesses the impact of dedicated theatre capacity provided by a specialist surgical team on rates of index admission cholecystectomy. Methods: This clinical cohort study compares the management of patients with symptomatic gallstone disease admitted to a tertiary care university teaching hospital over two equal but chronologically separate time periods. The periods were before and after service reconfiguration including a specialist HPB service with dedicated operating theatre time allocation. Results: There was a significant difference in the number of admissions over the two time periods with a greater proportion of patients having index admission surgery in the second time period with correspondingly fewer having more than one admission during this latter time period. In the second time period 43% of patients underwent index admission cholecystectomy compared to 23% in the first (P < 0.001). The duration of surgery was shorter for patients undergoing surgery during the second time period [135 (102–178) min in the first period and in the second period 106 (89–145) min] (P = 0.02). Discussion: This paper shows that the concentration of theatre resources and surgical expertise into regular theatre access for patients undergoing urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an effective and safe model for dealing with acute biliary disease.

[1]  S. Yasmin,et al.  Risk Factors, Complications , 2021 .

[2]  R. Markert,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Acute Care Surgery model: risk factors for complications , 2019, Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open.

[3]  G. Hanna,et al.  Optimum timing of emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in England: population-based cohort study , 2019, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Outcomes of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis performed at a single institution , 2019, Asian journal of endoscopic surgery.

[5]  T. Takada Tokyo Guidelines 2018: updated Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis/acute cholecystitis , 2018, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[6]  J. Blazeby,et al.  Population‐based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases , 2016, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  J. Watfah,et al.  Impact of a dedicated emergency surgical unit on early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. , 2016, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[8]  K. Gurusamy Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears better than delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis , 2015, Evidence-Based Medicine.

[9]  A. Dennison,et al.  Economic Implications of Providing Emergency Cholecystectomy for All Patients With Biliary Pathology: A Retrospective Analysis , 2015, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[10]  Cheng-Li Lin,et al.  A population-based cohort study. , 2015 .

[11]  H. Goor,et al.  IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. , 2013, Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.].

[12]  Colin D Johnson,et al.  Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus , 2012, Gut.

[13]  C. Frey Classification of acute pancreatitis , 1991, International journal of pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology.

[14]  M. F. Parry,et al.  A Retrospective Analysis , 1990 .