Motions and crew responses on an offshore oil production and storage vessel.

The motions of vessels may interfere with crew activities and well-being, but the relationships between motion and the experiences of crew are not well-established. Crew responses to motions of a floating production and storage offshore vessel at a fixed location in the North Sea were studied over a 5-month period to identify any changes in crew difficulties and symptoms associated with changes in vessel motion. Ship motions in all six axes (fore-aft, lateral, vertical, roll, pitch, and yaw) were recorded continuously over the 5-month period while 47 crew completed a total of 1704 daily diary entries, a participation rate of 66-78% of the crew complement. The dominant oscillations had frequencies of around 0.1 Hz, producing magnitudes of translational oscillation in accommodation areas of up to about 0.7 ms(-2)r.m.s., depending on the weather, and magnitudes up to three times greater in some other areas. The daily diaries gave ratings of difficulties with tasks, effort level, motion sickness, health symptoms, fatigue, and sleep. Problems most strongly associated with vessel motions were difficulties with physical tasks (balancing, moving and carrying), and sleep problems. Physical and mental tiredness, cognitive aspects of task performance, and stomach awareness and dizziness were also strongly associated with motion magnitude. There was a vomiting incidence of 3.1%, compared with a predicted mean vomiting incidence of 9.3% for a mixed population of unadapted adults. It is concluded that crew difficulties increase on days when vessel motions increase, with some activities and responses particularly influenced by vessel motions.

[1]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Sopite syndrome: a sometimes sole manifestation of motion sickness. , 1976, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[2]  A H Wertheim,et al.  Working in a moving environment. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[3]  M J Griffin,et al.  Prediction of the incidence of motion sickness from the magnitude, frequency, and duration of vertical oscillation. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Handbook of Human Vibration , 1990 .

[5]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  B D Lawson,et al.  The sopite syndrome revisited: drowsiness and mood changes during real or apparent motion. , 1998, Acta astronautica.

[7]  John C. Guignard,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES FOR MINIMIZING ADVERSE SHIP MOTION EFFECTS: THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1985 .

[8]  M J Griffin,et al.  Evaluating the motions of a semi-submersible platform with respect to human response. , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  K. Parkes,et al.  Sleep patterns, shiftwork, and individual differences: a comparison of onshore and offshore control-room operators. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[10]  R Kadefors,et al.  Musculo-skeletal symptoms as related to working conditions among Swedish professional fisherman. , 1988, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  William S. Peters,et al.  Principal Components and Factor Analysis , 1987 .

[12]  R Kadefors,et al.  Working on a moving surface--a biomechanical analysis of musculo-skeletal load due to ship motions in combination with work. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[13]  S H Uijtdehaage,et al.  Effects of scopolamine on autonomic profiles underlying motion sickness susceptibility. , 1993, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF SHIP MOTION , 1980 .

[15]  M J Griffin,et al.  Motion sickness and motion characteristics of vessels at sea. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[16]  Ross Graham Motion‐Induced Interruptions as Ship Operability Criteria , 1990 .

[17]  E C Poulton,et al.  The influence of ship motion on manual control skills , 1980 .

[18]  Motion sickness history questionnaire , 2000 .

[19]  H. Kemper,et al.  Maximal oxygen uptake during cycling is reduced in moving environments; consequences for motion-induced fatigue , 2002, Ergonomics.