Stochastic model for detection of signals in noise.

Fifty years ago Birdsall, Tanner, and colleagues made rapid progress in developing signal detection theory into a powerful psychophysical tool. One of their major insights was the utility of adding external noise to the signals of interest. These methods have been enhanced in recent years by the addition of multipass and classification-image methods for opening up the black box. There remain a number of as yet unresolved issues. In particular, Birdsall developed a theorem that large amounts of external input noise can linearize nonlinear systems, and Tanner conjectured, with mathematical backup, that what had been previously thought of as a nonlinear system could actually be a linear system with uncertainty. Recent findings, both experimental and theoretical, have validated Birdsall's theorem and Tanner's conjecture. However, there have also been experimental and theoretical findings with the opposite outcome. In this paper we present new data and simulations in an attempt to sort out these issues. Our simulations and experiments plus data from others show that Birdsall's theorem is quite robust. We argue that uncertainty can serve as an explanation for violations of Birdsall's linearization by noise and also for reports of stochastic resonance. In addition, we modify present models to better handle detection of signals with both noise and pedestal backgrounds.

[1]  Mikhail Katkov,et al.  Singularities in the inverse modeling of 2AFC contrast discrimination data , 2006, Vision Research.

[2]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  Color and shape interactions in the recognition of natural scenes by human and monkey observers. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[3]  Antony B. Morland,et al.  Retinotopic organisation of the visual cortex in human albinism , 2002 .

[4]  W. P. Tanner PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL DATA * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Robbe L. T. Goris,et al.  A neurophysiologically plausible population code model for human contrast discrimination. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[6]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing observers using external noise and observer models: assessing internal representations with external noise. , 2008, Psychological review.

[7]  A Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. III. On Bayesian use of prior knowledge and cross correlation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  The response of the amblyopic visual system to noise , 2007, Vision Research.

[9]  KIM T. BLACKWELL,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(97)00130-2 , 2003 .

[10]  Robbe L. T. Goris,et al.  Some observations on contrast detection in noise. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[11]  G. Henning,et al.  Some observations on the pedestal effect. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[12]  Helmut K. V. Lotsch Reply to “Correction to the theory of the Goos-Hänchen shift by Lotsch” by C. K. Carniglia , 1976 .

[13]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[14]  Karin H. James,et al.  Viewpoint preferences during the exploration of novel 3D objects , 2010 .

[15]  B. Dosher,et al.  Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location , 2000, Vision Research.

[16]  William McIlhagga,et al.  Effects of contrast and length on vernier acuity explained with noisy templates , 2003, Vision Research.

[17]  S. Klein,et al.  Separating transducer non-linearities and multiplicative noise in contrast discrimination , 2006, Vision Research.

[18]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  G. Rees,et al.  Fine-scale activity patterns in high-level visual areas encode the category of invisible objects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[20]  J P Thomas,et al.  Detection and identification: how are they related? , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  Theodore E. Cohn,et al.  Detectability of a luminance increment: Effect of superimposed random luminance fluctuation* , 1976 .

[22]  Theodore E. Cohn,et al.  Detection and identification , 1985 .

[23]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[24]  R A Smith,et al.  Spatial-frequency masking and Birdsall's theorem. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  L. Thibos,et al.  Detectability of a luminance increment. , 1974, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[26]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[27]  S A Klein,et al.  Double-judgment psychophysics: problems and solutions. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  W. Geisler,et al.  Ideal discriminators in spatial vision: two-point stimuli. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[30]  J H van Hateren,et al.  Simulating human cones from mid-mesopic up to high-photopic luminances. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[31]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[32]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  Geoffrey M. Boynton,et al.  Forward pattern masking and adaptation: Effects of duration, interstimulus interval, contrast, and spatial and temporal frequency , 1993, Vision Research.

[34]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Classification images for detection and position discrimination in the fovea and parafovea. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[35]  Christopher W Tyler,et al.  Separating the effects of response nonlinearity and internal noise psychophysically , 2002, Vision Research.

[36]  Theodore E. Cohn,et al.  Why luminance discrimination may be better than detection , 1981, Vision Research.

[37]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[38]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms. , 1974, Vision research.

[39]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Modelling contrast discrimination data suggest both the pedestal effect and stochastic resonance to be caused by the same mechanism. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[40]  J. L. Brown Visual Sensitivity , 1974 .

[41]  Theodore E. Cohn,et al.  Coincidence-enhanced stochastic resonance: Experimental evidence challenges the psychophysical theory behind stochastic resonance , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[42]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  What limits performance in the amblyopic visual system: seeing signals in noise with an amblyopic brain. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[43]  D. Kersten Spatial summation in visual noise , 1984, Vision Research.

[44]  Stanley A Klein A local measure for modeling contrast discrimination: Response to Katkov, Tsodyks and Sagi , 2007, Vision Research.

[45]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .