Analyzing Multiple Accelerometer Configurations to Detect Falls and Motion

The use of wearable devices with accelerometers developed to detect falls and motion has been continuously growing because of their small size, low weight, energy efficiency, and low price. However, the number of sensors, their position in the body and estimation methodologies are still open issues when tested in uncontrolled conditions. In this paper, we perform a discriminant analysis to determine which combinations of feature extraction characteristics and accelerometer positions are best fitted to estimate falls and particular movements. A dataset of 33 activities recorded with eight accelerometers distributed along the body of six participants is released as part of this work. Our analysis concludes that a waist-arm combination with a statistical feature is best fitted for most cases. But this work, rather than a single conclusion, is intended to provide a benchmark to other authors. The specific tests explain for example that the foot is not a good location for the accelerometer, or that static features are less relevant than dynamic ones.

[1]  Tao Li,et al.  Using discriminant analysis for multi-class classification: an experimental investigation , 2006, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[2]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  An On-Node Processing Approach for Anomaly Detection in Gait , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[3]  Lei Gao,et al.  Evaluation of accelerometer based multi-sensor versus single-sensor activity recognition systems. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Eduardo Casilari-Pérez,et al.  Analysis of Android Device-Based Solutions for Fall Detection , 2015, Sensors.

[5]  Inmaculada Plaza,et al.  Challenges, issues and trends in fall detection systems , 2013, Biomedical engineering online.

[6]  Jesús Francisco Vargas-Bonilla,et al.  Walk and Jog Characterization Using a Triaxial Accelerometer , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing.

[7]  Lei Gao,et al.  A comparison of classifiers for activity recognition using multiple accelerometer-based sensors , 2013, 2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Cybernetic Intelligent Systems (CIS).

[8]  S. J. Redmond,et al.  Sensors-Based Wearable Systems for Monitoring of Human Movement and Falls , 2012, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[9]  Surapa Thiemjarus,et al.  Automatic Fall Monitoring: A Review , 2014, Sensors.

[10]  Basel Kikhia,et al.  Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities , 2013, Sensors.

[11]  Kok Kiong Tan,et al.  Power-Efficient Interrupt-Driven Algorithms for Fall Detection and Classification of Activities of Daily Living , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.